Attitudes Towards Risk: An Experiment

Metroeconomica

Volumn 54, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 89-124

  Eichberger, Jürgen ^a,b,c   Güth, Werner ^a,b,c   Müller, Wieland ^a,b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

^b Max Planck Institute for Research into Economic Systems Jena   (Germany)

^c HUMBOLDT UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85008495903     PISSN: 00261386     EISSN: 1467999X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1467-999X.00161     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Becker G. M., DeGroot M. H., Marschak J. (1964): “Measuring utility by a single response sequential method”, Behavioral Science, 9, pp. 226–32.pmid/5888778
2. Bohm P., Linden J., Sonnegard J. (1997): “Eliciting reservation prices: Becker—DeGroot—Marschak mechanisms vs. markets”, Economic Journal, 107, pp. 1079–89.
3. Camerer C. (1995): “Individual decision making”, in Kagel J. H., Roth A. E. (eds), The Handbook of Experimental Economics, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, ch. 8, pp. 587–703.
4. Chateauneuf A., Cohen M. (1994): “Risk-seeking with diminishing marginal utility in a non-expected utility model”, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 9, pp. 77–91.
5. Chateauneuf A., Cohen M. (2000): “Choquet expected utility model: a new approach to individual behavior under uncertainty and to social welfare”, in Grabisch M., Murofushi T., Sugeno M. (eds), Fuzzy Measures and Integrals: Theory and Applications Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg, New York, pp. 289–313.
6. Cubitt R. P., Starmer C., Sugden R. (1998a): “Dynamic choice and the common ratio effect: an experimental investigation”, Economic Journal, 108, pp. 1362–80.
7. Cubitt R. P., Starmer C., Sugden R. (1998b): “On the validity of the random lottery incentive system”, Experimental Economics, 1, pp. 115–31.
8. von Neumann J., Morgenstern O. (1947): Theory of Games and Economic Behaviour, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
9. Quiggin J. (1982): “A theory of anticipated utility”, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 3, pp. 323–43.
10. Rabin M. (2000): “Risk aversion and expected-utility theory: a calibration theorem”, Econometrica, 68, pp. 1281–92.
11. Rothschild M., Stiglitz J. (1970): “Increasing risk: I. A definition”, Journal of Economic Theory, 2, pp. 225–43.
12. Samuelson W, Zeckhauser R. (1988): “Status quo bias in decision making”, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1, pp. 7–59.
13. Tverski A., Kahneman D. (1992): “Advances in prospect theory: cumulative representation of uncertainty”, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5, pp. 297–323.