Corrigendum to “A geographically resolved method to estimate levelized power plant costs with environmental externalities” [Energy Policy 102 (2017) 491–499](S0301421516306875)(10.1016/j.enpol.2016.12.025);A geographically resolved method to estimate levelized power plant costs with environmental externalities

Energy Policy

Volumn 102, Issue , 2017, Pages 491-499

  Rhodes, Joshua D ^a,b   King, Carey ^b   Gulen, Gürcan ^c   Olmstead, Sheila M ^d   Dyer, James S ^d   Hebner, Robert E ^a   Beach, Fred C ^b   Edgar, Thomas F ^a,b   Webber, Michael E ^a,b  

^a The University of Texas at Austin   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

Author keywords

CO2; Externalities; LCOE; Methane leakage; Power plants; Regional spatial data

Indexed keywords

COST ESTIMATING; ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY; POWER PLANTS;

EXTERNALITIES; LCOE; LEVELIZED COST OF ELECTRICITIES; METHANE LEAKAGE; NATURAL GAS COMBINED CYCLES; POWER PLANT TECHNOLOGY; REGIONAL/SPATIAL DATA; RESOURCE AVAILABILITY;

COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS;

CARBON DIOXIDE; ESTIMATION METHOD; LEAKAGE; METHANE; POWER PLANT; SPATIAL DATA;

UNITED STATES;

EID: 85008428299     PISSN: 03014215     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2018.02.029     Document Type: Erratum

References (37)

1. 3Tier, 2015 3Tier. Wind Energy Project Feasibility. 2015. URL: 〈 http://www.3tier.com/en/products/wind/project-feasibility/〉.
2. Black and Veatch., 2012. Cost and performance data for power generation technologies. Tech. Rep. February; Black and Veatch.
3. Buonocore, J.J., Dong, X., Spengler, J.D., Fu, J.S., Levy, J.I., Using the community multiscale air quality (CMAQ) model to estimate public health impacts of PM2.5 from individual power plants. Environ. Int. 68 (2014), 200–208, 10.1016/j.envint.2014.03.031 (URL: 〈 http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0160412014001111〉).
4. Chou, V., Iyengar, A.K., Shah, V., Woods, M., 2015. Cost and Performance Baseline for Fossil Energy Plants. URL: 〈 https://www.netl.doe.gov/FileLibrary/Research/EnergyAnalysis/Publications/BitBase_Partial_Capture_final.pdf〉.
5. Cohon, J.L., 2010. Hidden costs of energy: unpriced consequences of energy production and use. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; ISBN 9780309146401. URL: 〈 http://books.google.com/books?Id=POv0yNOuqhEC〉.
6. Cullen, J., Measuring the environmental benefits of wind-generated electricity. Am. Econ. J.: Econ. Policy 5:4 (2013), 107–133, 10.1257/pol.5.4.107 (URL: 〈 http://pubs.aeaweb.org/doi/abs/10.1257/pol.5.4.107〉).
7. Drury, E., Lopez, A., Denholm, P., Margolis, R., Relative performance of tracking versus fixed tilt photovoltaic systems in the USA. Prog. Photovolt.: Res. Appl. 22:12 (2013), 1302–1315, 10.1002/pip.2373 (URL: 〈 http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/pip.2373/fullhttp://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/pip.2373〉).
8. eGrid. 2015. URL: 〈 http://www.epa.gov/cleanenergy/energy-resources/egrid/〉.
9. EIA. Updated Capital Cost Estimates for Utility Scale Electricity Generating Plants. 2013. URL: 〈 http://www.eia.gov/forecasts/capitalcost/pdf/updated_capcost.pdf〉.
10. EIA. Annual Energy Outlook 2014. 2014. URL: 〈http://www.eia.gov/forecasts/aeo/pdf/0383(2014).pdf. 〉.
11. Epstein, P.R., Buonocore, J.J., Eckerle, K., Hendryx, M., Stout, B.M., Heinberg, R., et al. Full cost accounting for the life cycle of coal. Ann. New Y. Acad. Sci. 1219:1 (2011), 73–98, 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2010.05890.x.
12. Gilbert, A., Sovacool, B.K., Johnstone, P., Stirling, A., Cost overruns and financial risk in the construction of nuclear power reactors:a critical appraisal. Energy Policy, 2016, 10.1016/j.enpol.2016.04.001 (URL: 〈 http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0301421516301690〉).
13. Hildebrand, A.N., 2009. Strategies for demonstration and early deployment of carbon capture and storage: a technical and economic assessment of capture percentage. (Ph.D. thesis); Massachusetts Institute of Technology. URL: 〈 http://sequestration.mit.edu/pdf/AshleighHildebrand_Thesis_May09.pdf〉.
14. S. Holland E. Mansur N. Muller A. Yates, 2015. Environmental Benefits from Driving Electric Vehicles? doi: 10.3386/w21291.URL:(URL: 〈http://www.nber.org/papers/w21291.pdf〉).
15. Jacobson, M.Z., Delucchi, M.A., Bazouin, G., Bauer, Z.A.F., Heavey, C.C., Fisher, E., et al. 100% clean and renewable wind{,} water{,} and sunlight (WWS) all-sector energy roadmaps for the 50 United States. Energy Environ. Sci., 8, 2015, 10.1039/C5EE01283J (URL: 〈 http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C5EE01283J〉).
16. Joskow, P.L., Comparing the costs of intermittent and dispatchable electricity generating technologies. Am. Econ. Rev. 101:3 (2011), 238–241, 10.1257/aer.101.3.238 (URL: 〈 http://pubs.aeaweb.org/doi/10.1257/aer.101.3.238〉).
17. Kaffine, D.T., McBee, B.J., Lieskovsky, J., Emissions savings from wind power generation in texas. Energy J., 34, 2013, 1, 10.5547/01956574.34.1.7 (URL: 〈 http://www.iaee.org/en/publications/ejarticle.aspx?id=2509〉).
18. King, C.W., Gülen, G., Cohen, S.M., Nuñez-Lopez, V., The system-wide economics of a carbon dioxide capture, utilization, and storage network: texas gulf coast with pure CO2-EOR flood. Environ. Res. Lett., 8(3), 2013, 034030, 10.1088/1748-9326/8/3/034030 (URL: 〈 http://iopscience.iop.org/1748-9326/8/3/034030%5Cnhttp://iopscience.iop.org/1748-9326/8/3/034030/article〉).
19. King, C.W., editor, 2014. Thermal Power Plant Cooling: Context and Engineering. First ed.; ASME; ISBN 9780791860250. URL: https://www.asme.org/products/books/thermal-power-plant-cooling-context.
20. Koomey, J., Hultman, N.E., Grubler, A., A reply to âĂIJHistorical construction costs of global nuclear power reactorsâĂİ. Energy Policy, 2016, 1–4, 10.1016/j.enpol.2016.03.052 (URL: 〈 http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0301421516301549〉).
21. Lazard., 2014. Lazard's Levelized Cost of Energy Analysis, Version 8.0. URL: 〈 www.lazard.com〉.
22. Lovering, J.R., Yip, A., Nordhaus, T., Historical construction costs of global nuclear power reactors. Energy Policy 91 (2016), 371–382, 10.1016/j.enpol.2016.01.011 (URL: 〈 http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0301421516300106〉).
23. Mai, T., Wiser, R., Sandor, D., Brinkman, G., Heath, G., Denholm, P., et al., 2012. Volume 1: Exploration of high-penetration renewable electricity futures. Renewable Electricity Futures Study; 1: 280.
24. Marten, A.L., Newbold, S.C., 2012. Estimating the social cost of non-CO2 GHG emissions: Methane and nitrous oxide. Energy Policy; 51: 957–972. URL: 〈 http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0301421512008555〉. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.09.073.
25. Mays, G.T., Belles, R.J., Blevins, B.R., Hadley, S.W., Harrison, T.J., Jochem, W.C., et al., 2012. Application of Spatial Data Modeling and Geographical Information Systems (GIS) for Identification of Potential Siting Options for Various Electrical Generation Sources. Tech. Rep.; OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY.
26. McCubbin, D., Sovacool, B.K., Quantifying the health and environmental benefits of wind power to natural gas. Energy Policy 53 (2013), 429–441, 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.11.004 (URL: 〈 http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S030142151200969X〉).
27. Muller, N.Z., Mendelsohn, R., Efficient pollution regulation: getting the prices right. Am. Econ. Rev. 99:5 (2009), 1714–1739, 10.1257/aer.99.5.1714 (URL: 〈 http://pubs.aeaweb.org/doi/abs/10.1257/aer.99.5.1714〉).
28. Novan, K., Valuing the wind: renewable energy policies and air pollution avoided âĂă. Am. Econ. J.: Econ. Policy 7:3 (2015), 291–326, 10.1257/pol.20130268 (URL: 〈 http://pubs.aeaweb.org/doi/10.1257/pol.20130268〉).
29. NREL, System Advisor Model (SAM). 2015. URL: 〈 https://sam.nrel.gov〉.
30. Rhodes, J.D., Imane Bouhou, N.E., Upshaw, C.R., Blackhurst, M.F., Webber, M.E., Residential energy retrofits in a cooling climate. J. Build. Eng. 6 (2016), 112–118, 10.1016/j.jobe.2016.03.001 (URL: 〈 http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2352710216300250〉).
31. Sanders, K.T., Blackhurst, M.F., King, C.W., Webber, M.E., The impact of water use fees on dispatching and water requirements for water-cooled power plants in texas. Environ. Sci. Technol. 48:12 (2014), 7128–7134, 10.1021/es500469q (URL: 〈 http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/es500469q〉).
32. Shindell, D.T., The social cost of atmospheric release. Clim. Change 130:2 (2015), 313–326, 10.1007/s10584-015-1343-0 (URL: 〈 http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10584-015-1343-0〉).
33. Siler-Evans, K., Azevedo, I.L., Morgan, M.G., Apt, J., Regional variations in the health, environmental, and climate benefits of wind and solar generation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 110:29 (2013), 11768–11773, 10.1073/pnas.1221978110 (URL: 〈 http://www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1221978110〉).
34. Sullivan, P., Cole, W., Blair, N., Lantz, E., Krishnan, V., Mai, T., et al. 2015. Standard scenarios annual report: U.S. electric sector scenario exploration. Tech. Rep. July; NREL; 2015.
35. Supekar, S.D., Skerlos, S.J., Reassessing the efficiency penalty from carbon capture in coal-fired power plants. Environ. Sci. Technol. 49:20 (2015), 12576–12584, 10.1021/acs.est.5b03052 (URL: 〈 http://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.5b03052〉).
36. Technical Update of the Social Cost of Carbon for Regulatory Impact Analysis. 2013. URL: 〈 https://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/inforeg/social_cost_of_carbon_for_ria_2013_update.pdf〉.
37. Wittenstein, M., Rothewll, G. 2015. Projected costs of generating electricity. 2015 ed.; Paris, France: International Energy Agency. ISBN 978-92-64-24443-6. URL: 〈 https://www.iea.org/bookshop/711-Projected_Costs_of_Generating_Electricity〉.