Fabrication of curcumin-loaded gum tragacanth/poly(vinyl alcohol) nanofibers with optimized electrospinning parameters

Journal of Industrial Textiles

Volumn 46, Issue 5, 2017, Pages 1170-1192

  Ranjbar Mohammadi, Marziyeh ^a   Kargozar, Saeid ^b   Bahrami, S Hajir ^c   Joghataei, M T ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BONAB   (Iran)

^b IRAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (Iran)

^c AMIRKABIR UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Iran)

Author keywords

artificial neural network; biological properties; Electrospining; nanofiber; optimization; response surface methodology

Indexed keywords

BACKPROPAGATION; BACKPROPAGATION ALGORITHMS; MULTILAYER NEURAL NETWORKS; NEURAL NETWORKS; OPTIMIZATION; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

BIOLOGICAL PROPERTIES; BOXBEHNKEN DESIGN (BBD); ELECTROSPINING; ELECTROSPINNING PARAMETERS; POLYMER CONCENTRATIONS; RESPONSE SURFACE METHODOLOGY; RESPONSE SURFACE MODELING; SOLUTION CONCENTRATION;

NANOFIBERS;

EID: 85008259907     PISSN: 15280837     EISSN: 15308057     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1528083715613631     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Tan SH, Inai R, Kotaki M. Systematic parameter study for ultra-fine fiber fabrication via electrospinning process. Polymer 2005; 46: 6128–6134.
2. Lim SH, Mao HQ. Electrospun scaffolds for stem cell engineering. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2009; 61: 1084–1096.
3. Garg K, Bowlin GL. Electrospinning jets and nanofibrous structures. Biomicrofluidics 2011; 5: 13403–13403.
4. Ramakrishna S, Fujihara K, Teo WE. Electrospun nanofibers: Solving global issues. Mater Today 2006; 9: 40–50.
5. Liang D, Hsiao BS, Chu B. Functional electrospun nanofibrous scaffolds for biomedical applications. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2007; 59. 1392–1312.
6. Baji A, Mai YW, Wong SC. Electrospinning of polymer nanofibers: Effects on oriented morphology, structures and tensile properties. Compos Sci Technol 2010; 70: 703–718.
7. Casper C, Stephens J, Tassi N. Controlling surface morphology of electrospun polystyrene fibers: Effect of humidity and molecular weight in the electrospinning process. Macromolecules 2004; 37: 573–578.
8. Megelski S, Stephens JS, Chase DB. Micro-and nanostructured surface morphology on electrospun polymer fibers. Macromolecules 2002; 35: 8456–8466.
9. Khuri AI, Cornell JA. Responses surfaces: design and analyses, 1st edn. New York: Marcel Dekker, 1996.
10. Bas D, Boyaci IH. Modeling and optimization I: Usability of response surface methodology. Food Eng 2007; 78: 836–845.
11. Montgomery DC. Design and analysis of experiments, 3th edn. New York: John Wiley Sons, 1991.
12. Myers RH, Montgomery DC, Anderson-Cook CM. Response surface methodology: Process and product optimization using designed experiments, New York: John Wiley Sons, 1995.
13. Aybastier O, Demir C. Optimization of immobilization conditions of Thermomyces lanuginosus lipase on styrene-divinylbenzene copolymer using response surface methodology. J Mol Catal B: Enzyme 2010; 63: 170–178.
14. Yordem O, Papila M, Menceloglu YZ. Effects of electrospinning parameters on polyacrylonitrile nanofiber diameter: An investigation by response surface methodology. Mater Des 2008; 29: 34–44.
15. Tsimpliaraki A, Svinterikos S, Zuburtikudis I. Nanofibrous structure of nonwoven mats of electrospun biodegradable polymer nanocompositess: A design of experiments (DoE) Study. Ind Eng Chem Res 2009; 48: 4365–4374.
16. Chen JP, Ho KH, Chiang YP. Fabrication of electrospun poly(methyl methacrylate) nanofibrous membranes by statistical approach for application in enzyme immobilization. J Membr Sci 2009; 340: 9–15.
17. Coles SR, Jacobs DK, Meredith JO. A design of experiments (DoE) approach to material properties optimization of electrospun nanofibers. J Appl Polym Sci 2010; 117: 2251–2257.
18. Sukigara S, Gandhi M, Ayutsede J. Regeneration of Bombyx mori silk by electrospinning. Part 1: Processing parameters and geometric properties. Polymer 2003; 4: 5721–5727.
19. Sukigara S, Gandhi M, Ayutsede J. Regeneration of Bombyx mori silk by electrospinning. Part 2. Process optimization and empirical modeling using response surface methodology. Polymer 2004; 45: 3701–3708.
20. Beale MH, Hagan MT, Demuth HB. Neural network toolbox user’s guide, Massachusetts: The Mathworks Inc, 2004.
21. Chow TT, Zhang GQ, Lin Z. Global optimization of absorption chiller system by genetic algorithm and neural network. Energy Build 2002; 34: 103–109.
22. González PA, Zamarreno JM. Prediction of hourly energy consumption in buildings based on a feedback artificial neural network. Energy Build 2005; 37: 595–601.
23. Sarkar K, Ghalia MB, Wu Z. A neural network model for the mnumerical prediction of the diameter of electro-spun polyethylene oxide nanofibers. J Mater Process Technol 2009; 209: 3156–3165.
24. Faridi-Majidi R, Ziyadi H, Naderi N. Use of artificial neural networks to determine parameters controlling the nanofibers diameter in electrospinning of nylon-6,6. J Appl Polym Sci 2012; 124: 1589–1597.
25. Weiping W, Tragacanth and karaya. In: Philips GO, Williams PA, (eds). Handbook of hydrocolloids, Cambridge, UK: CRC Press, 2000, pp. 231–246.
26. Ranjbar-Mohammadi M, Bahrami SH, Joghataei MT. Development of nanofibrous scaffolds containing gum tragacanth/poly (ɛ-caprolactone) for application as skin scaffolds. J Mater Sci Eng C 2015; 48: 71–79.
27. Ranjbar mohammadi M, Zamani M, Prabhakaran MP. Electrospun PLGA/gum tragacanth nanofibers containing tetracycline hydrochloride for reconstruction of periodontal diseases. J Mater Sci Eng C 2016; 58: 521–531.
28. Finch CA. Polyvinyl alcohol; properties and applications, New York: Wiley Interscience, 1973.
29. Chattopadhyay A, Biswas K, Bandyopadhyay RU. Turmeric and curcumin: Biological actions and medicinal applications. Curr Sci 2004; 87: 44–53.
30. Bhaarathi D, Nachimuthu S, Ramasamy M. Electrospinning of curcumin loaded chitosan/poly(lactic acid) nanofilm and evaluation of its medicinal characteristics. Front Mater Sci 2013; 7: 350–361.
31. Ranjbar-Mohammadi M, Bahrami SH, Joghataei MT. Fabrication of novel nanofiber scaffolds from gum Tragacanth/Poly(vinyl alcohol) for wound dressing application: In vitro evaluation and antibacterial properties. J Mater Sci Eng C 2013; 33: 4935–4943.
32. Singh KP, Gupta S, Singh AK. Optimizing adsorption of crystal violet dye from water by magnetic nanocomposite using response surface modeling approach. J Hazard Mater 2011; 186: 1462–1473.
33. Ravikumar K, Ramalingam S, Krishnan S. Application of response surface methodology to optimize the process variables for reactive red and acid brown dye removal using a novel adsorbent. Dye Pigment 2006; 70: 18–26.
34. Leshno M, Lin VY, Pinkus A. Multilayer feed forward networks with a nonpolynomial activation can approximate anyfunction. Neural Network 1993; 6: 861–867.
35. Chattopadhyay R and Guha A. Textile progress of artificial neural network: Applications to textiles. Manchester: The Textile Institute, 2004, pp.1–46
36. Balaghi S, Mohammadifar MA, Zargaraan A. Compositional analysis and rheological characterization of gum tragacanth exudates from six species of Iranian Astragalus. Food Hydrocolloid 2011; 25: 1775–1784.
37. Yang F, Murugan R, Wang S. Electrospinning of nano/micro scale poly(l-lactic acid) aligned fibers and their potential in neural tissue engineering. Biomaterials 2005; 26: 2603–2610.
38. Amani A, York P, Chrystynand H. Factors affecting the stability of nanoemulsions-use of artificial neural networks. Pharm Res 2010; 27: 37–45.
39. Ramakrishna S. An introduction to electrospinning and nanofibers. Hackensack, NJ: World Scientific, 2005, pp.104–113
40. Kasiri MB, Aleboyeh H, Aleboyeh A. Modeling and optimization of heterogeneous photo-Fenton process with response surface methodology and artificial neural networks. Environ Sci Technol 2008; 42: 7970–7975.