Fundamental legal conceptions reconsidered

Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 41-54

  Halpin, Andrew ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85008222726     PISSN: 08418209     EISSN: 20564260     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0841820900006627     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. W.N. Hohfeld, Fundamental Legal Conceptions (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1919), .
2. R.E. Robinson, S.C. Coval & J.C. Smith, "The Logic of Rights" (1983) 33.
3. Albert Kocourek, "Plurality of Advantage and Disadvantage in Jural Relations" (1920) 19.
4. Daniel T. O'Reilly, Are There Any Fundamental Legal Conceptions? (1999) 49.
5. H.L.A. Hart, Essays on Bentham (1982) 11.
6. Joseph Raz, The Concept of a Legal System (1970) 56.
7. Philip Mullock, "Logic and Liberty" (1979) 35.
8. Keith Burgess- Jackson, "Teaching Legal Theory with Venn Diagrams" (1998) 29.
9. David Londey & Carmen Johanson, Apuleius and the Square of Opposition (1984) 29.
10. Terence Parsons, "The Traditional Square of Opposition-A Biography" (1997) 18.
11. Are There Any Fundamental Legal Conceptions? 5.
12. Are There Any Fundamental Legal Conceptions?, 5, 276.
13. Are There Any Fundamental Legal Conceptions? 5 27.
14. Andrew Halpin, Reasoning with Law (2001) 162-65.
15. Are There Any Fundamental Legal Conceptions? 5 276.