Waist-to-hip ratios and female attractiveness: Comparing apples, oranges, and pears

The Body Beautiful: Evolutionary and Sociocultural Perspectives

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 15-28

  McBurney, Donald H ^a   Streeter, Sybil A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85008156702     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1057/9780230596887     Document Type: Chapter

References (34)

1. Aronson, E., Wilson, T. D., & Akert, R. A. (1994). Social psychology: The heart and the mind. New York: Harper Collins.
2. Baron, R. A., & Byrne, D. (1994). Social psychology: Understanding human interaction (7th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
3. Buss, D. M. (1989). Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12, 1-49.
4. Fan, J., Liu, F., Wu, J., & Dai, W. (2004). Visual perception of female physical attractiveness. Proceedings of the Royal Society London B, 271, 347-352.
5. Forestell, C. A., Humphrey, T. M., & Stewart, S. H. (2004). Involvement of body weight and shape factors in ratings of attractiveness by women: A replication and extension of Tassinary and Hansen. Personality and Individual Differences, 36, 295-305.
6. Furnham, A., & Alibhai, N. (1983). Cross-cultural differences in the perception of female body shapes. Psychological Medicine, 13, 829-837.
7. Furnham, A., & Reeves, E. (2006). The relative influence of facial neotony and waist-to-hip ratio on judgements of female attractiveness and fecundity. Psychology, Health and Medicine, 11, 129-141.
8. Furnham, A., Lavancy, M., & McClelland, A. (2001). Waist-to-hip ratio and facial attractiveness: A pilot study. Personality and Individual Differences, 30, 491-502.
9. Gigerenzer, G., Todd, P. M., & the ABC Research Group. (1999). Simple heuristics that make us smart. New York: Oxford University Press.
10. Henss, R. (2000). WHR and female attractiveness: Evidence from photographic stimuli and methodological considerations. Personality and Individual Differences, 28, 501-513.
11. Jacobsen, A., & Gilchrist, A. (1988). The ratio principle holds over a million-toone range of illumination. Perception and Psychophysics, 43, 1-6.
12. Kirschner, M. A., & Samojlik, E. (1991). Sex hormone metabolism in upper and lower body obesity. International Journal of Obesity, 15, 101-108.
13. Lassek, W. D., & Gaulin S. J. C. (2006). Changes in body fat distribution in relation to parity in American women: A covert form of maternal depletion. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 131, 295-302.
14. Marlowe, F. W., & Wetsman, A. (2001). Preferred waist-to-hip ratio and ecology. Personality and Individual Differences, 30, 481-489.
15. Marlowe, F. W., Apicella, C. L., & Reed, D. (2005). Men's preferences for women's profile waist-hip-ratio in two societies. Evolution and Human Behavior, 26, 458-468.
16. Mook, D. G. (1983). In defense of external invalidity. American Psychologist, 38, 379-389.
17. Singh, D. (1993a). Adaptive significance of female physical attractiveness: The role of waist-to-hip ratio. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 293-307.
18. Singh, D. (1993b). Body shape and women's attractiveness: The critical role of waist-to-hip ratio. Human Nature, 4, 297-321.
19. Singh, D. (1994). Is thin really beautiful and good? Relationship between waist-tohip ratio (WHR) and female attractiveness. Personality and Individual Differences, 16, 123-132.
20. Singh, D. (2006). Universal allure of the hourglass figure: An evolutionary theory of female physical attractiveness. Clinics in Plastic Surgery, 33, 359-370.
21. Stevens, S. S. (1966). On the operation known as judgment. American Scientist, 54, 385-401.
22. Streeter, S. A., & McBurney, D. H. (2003). Waist-hip ratio and attractiveness: New evidence and a critique of 'a critical test.' Evolution and Human Behavior, 24, 88-98.
23. Swami, V., & Furnham, A. (2006). The science of attraction. The Psychologist, 19, 362-365.
24. Swami, V., & Tovée, M. J. (2005). Female physical attractiveness in Britain and Malaysia: A cross-cultural study. Body Image, 2, 115-128.
25. Swami, V., & Tovée, M. J. (2006). Does hunger influence judgments of female physical attractiveness? British Journal of Psychology, 97, 353-363.
26. Tassinary, L. G., & Hansen, K. A. (1998). A critical test of the WHR hypothesis of female physical attractiveness. Psychological Science, 9, 150-155.
27. Tovée, M. J., Swami, V., Furnham, A., & Mangalparsad, R. (2006). Changing perceptions of attractiveness as observers are exposed to a different culture. Evolution and Human Behavior, 27, 443-456.
28. Tovée, M. J., Hancock, P. J. B., Mahmoodi, S., Singleton, B. R. R., & Cornelissen, P. L. (2002). Human female attractiveness: Waveform analysis of human body shape. Proceedings of the Royal Society London B, 269, 2205-2213.
29. Wass, P., Waldenstrom, U., Rossner, S., & Hellberg, D. (1997). An android body fat distribution in females impairs the pregnancy rate of in-vitro fertilizationembryo transfer. Human Reproduction, 12, 2057-2060.
30. Weeden, J., & Sabini, J. (2005). Physical attractiveness and health in Western societies: A review. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 635-653.
31. Weisberg, S. (2005). Applied linear regression. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Interscience.
32. Wetsman, A., & Marlowe, F. (1999). How universal are preferences for female waist-to-hip ratios? Evidence from the Hadza of Tanzania. Evolution and Human Behavior, 20, 219-228.
33. Yu, D. W., & Shepard, G. H. (1998). Is beauty in the eye of the beholder? Nature, 396, 321-322.
34. Zaadstra, B. M., Seidell, J. C., Van Noord, P. A., te Velde, E. R., Habbema, J. D., Vrieswijk, B., et al. (1993). Fat and female fecundity: Prospective study of body fat distribution on conception rates. British Medical Journal, 306, 484-487.