What Is Embedded Systems and How Should It Be Taught?-Results from a Didactic Analysis

ACM Transactions on Embedded Computing Systems

Volumn 4, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 633-651

  Grimheden, Martin ^a   Törngren, Martin ^a  

^a ROYAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Didactic analysis; education; Human Factors; Theory

Indexed keywords

EID: 85008048951     PISSN: 15399087     EISSN: 15583465     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1145/1086519.1086528     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Abramovitch, D. Y., Franklin, G. F., 2004. Fifty years in control-the story of the ieee control systems society. IEEE Control Systems Magazine 14, 19-36.
2. Adamsson, N., 2002. Mechatronics engineering-new requirements on cross-functional integration. Licentiate Thesis. Department of Machine Design, Royal Institute of Technology.
3. Biggs, J., 2003. Teaching for Quality Learning at University. The Society for Research into Higher Education, Open University Press, United Kingdom.
4. Bloom, B., Mesia, B., Krathwohl, D., 1964. Taxonomy of Educational Objectives (two vols: The Affective Domain and The Cognitive Domain). David McKay, New York.
5. Comerford, R., 1994. Mecha…what? Spectrum, IEEE 31, 8, 46-49.
6. Dahlgren, L., 1990. Undervisningen och det meningsfulla Icirandet. Linkoping University.
7. Grimheden, M., Hanson, M., 2001. What is mechatronics? proposing a didactic approach to mechatronics. In Proceedings ofthe 1st Baltic Sea Workshop on Education in Mechatronics, Kiel, Germany. 97-104.
8. Grimheden, M., Hanson, M., 2003. How might education in mechatronics benefit from problem based learning? In Proceedings ofthe 4th Workshop on Research and Education in Mechatronics, Bochum, Germany.
9. Grimheden, M., Hanson, M., 2005. Mechatronics the evolution of an academic discipline in engineering education. Mechatronics 15, 2, 179-192.
10. IEEE. 1990. Glossary of Software Engineering Terminology, IEEE Std 610.12. IEEE, New York.
11. Josefsson, M., Ed. 2003. Industriell Programvaruutveckling. ITQ Nordic Institute.
12. Kansanen, P., 1995. The deutsche didaktik and the american research on teaching. In Discussions on Some Educational Issues, Kansanen, Ed. Tech. rep., Department of Teacher Education, University of Helsinki.
13. Marton, F., Säljö, R. 1976a. On qualitative differences in learning: I-outcome and process. British Journal of Educational Psychology 46, 4-11.
14. Marton, F., Säljö, R. 1976b. On qualitative differences in learning: li-outcome as a function ofthe learner's conception ofthe task. British Journal of Educational Psychology 46, 115-127.
15. Marton, F., Hounsell, D., Entwistle, N., 1984. The experience of learning. Scottish Academic Press, Edinburgh.
16. Tcorngren, M., 2003. Embedded systems of strategic importance for swedish society-where are the needs and how should efforts be directed? Essay and summary from the panel debate at Realtime in sweden.
17. Toorngren, M., Larses, O., 2004. Characterization of model-based development of embedded control systems from a mechatronic perspective; drivers, processes, technology and their maturity. In Summer School on Model Driven Engineering for Embedded Systems, September 2004.
18. Vernon, D., Blake, R., 1993. Does problem-based learning work? a meta-analysis of evaluative research. Acad Med. 68, 7, 550-563.
19. Wikander, J., Torngren, M., Hanson, M., 2001. The science and education of mechatronics engineering. IEEE Robotics and Automation Magazine 8, 2, 20-26.