Fuzzy Algorithm for Group Decision Making With Participants Having Finite Discriminating Abilities

IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics Part A: Systems and Humans

Volumn 39, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 86-95

  Kobashikawa, Carlos ^a   Dong, Fangyan ^a   Hirota, Kaoru ^a   Hatakeyama, Yutaka ^b  

^a TOKYO INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Japan)

^b KOCHI MEDICAL SCHOOL   (Japan)

Author keywords

Decision making; fuzzy inference; fuzzy utility; nash solution

Indexed keywords

EID: 85008018457     PISSN: 10834427     EISSN: 15582426     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/TSMCA.2009.2007946     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. N. Nikolova, A. Shulus, D. Toneva, and K. Tenekedjiev, “Fuzzy rationality in quantitative decision analysis,” J. Advanced Comput. Intell. Intell. Informat., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 65–69, Jan. 2005.
2. K. Tenekedjiev, N. Nikolova, and D. Dimitrakiev, “Application of the triple bisection method for extraction of subjective utility information,” in Proc. 2nd Int. Conf. Management and Engineering', Sofia, Bulgaria, 2004, vol. 2, no. 70, pp. 115–117.
3. C. Kahraman, D. Ruan, and I. Dogan, “Fuzzy group decision-making for facility location selection,” Inf. Sci., vol. 157, pp. 135–153, Dec. 2003.
4. R. Slowinski, Fuzzy Sets in Decision Analysis, Operation Research and Statistics. Norwell, MA: Kluwer, 1998, pp. 112–131.
5. J. Ma, Z. Fan, Y. Jiang, and J. Mao, “An optimization approach to multiperson decision making based on different formats of preference information,” IEEE Trans. Syst., Man, Cybern. A, Syst., Humans, vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 876–889, Sep. 2006.
6. C. Yeh and H. Deng, “A practical approach to fuzzy utilities comparison in fuzzy multicriteria analysis,” Int. J. Approx. Reason., vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 179–194, Feb. 2004.
7. M. A. Gil and M. López-Díaz, “Fundamentals and Bayesian analyses of decision problems with fuzzy-valued utilities,” Int. J. Approx. Reason., vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 203–224, Oct. 1996.
8. V. Huynh, Y. Nakamori, T. Ho, and T. Murai, “Multiple-attribute decision making under uncertainty: The evidential reasoning approach revisited,” IEEE Trans. Syst., Man, Cybern. A, Syst., Humans, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 804–822, Jul. 2006.
9. K. Tenekedjiev, N. Nikolova, and R. Pfliegl, “Utility elicitation with the uncertain equivalence method,” in Proc. Bulgarian Academy Sci. (Comptes Rendus), 2006, vol. 59, pp. 283–288. book 3.
10. C. White and H. Holloway, “Resolvability for imprecise multiattribute alternative selection,” IEEE Trans. Syst., Man, Cybern. A, Syst., Humans, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 162–169, Jan. 2008.
11. K. Katsikopoulos and B. Fasolo, “New tools for decision analysis,” IEEE Trans. Syst., Man, Cybern. A, Syst., Humans, vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 960–967, Sep. 2006.
12. T. L. Saaty and J. S. Shang, “Group decision-making: Head-count versus intensity of preference,” Socio-Econ. Plann. Sci., vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 22–37, Mar. 2007.
13. D. Ben-Arieh and Z. Chen, “Linguistic-labels aggregation and consensus measure for autocratic decision making using group recommendations,” IEEE Trans. Syst., Man, Cybern. A, Syst., Humans, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 558–568, May 2006.
14. H. Raiffa, J. Richardson, and D. Metcalfe, Negotiation Analysis. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press, 2002, p. 90, 353, 455, 456, 462.
15. H. Qian, Z. QiLun, and F. Wenhao, “Implementation method for voting of neural networks,” in Proc. Int. IEEE Conf. CIMSA, 2004, pp. 98–101.
16. G. Auda and M. Kamel, “CMNN: Cooperative modular neural networks for pattern recognition,” Pattern Recognit. Lett., vol. 18, no. 11–13, pp. 1391–1398, Nov. 1997.
17. G. Auda and M. Kamel, “CMNN: Cooperative modular neural networks,” Neurocomputing, vol. 20, no. 1–3, pp. 189–207, Aug. 1998.
18. J. Virapanicharoen and W. Benjapolakul, “Fair-efficient guard bandwidth coefficients selection in call admission control for mobile multimedia communications using game theoretic framework,” in Proc. Int. IEEE Conf. Commun., 2004, vol. 1, pp. 80–84.
19. M. Klein, P. Faratin, H. Sayama, and Y. Bar-Yam, “Negotiation algorithms for collaborative design settings,” in Proc. Int. Conf. CERA, 2003, pp. 161–167.
20. B. Rubenstein-Montano and R. A. Malaga, “A weighted sum genetic algorithm to support multiple-party multi-objective negotiations,” IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput., vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 366–377, Aug. 2002.
21. E. S. Rosebloom, “A probabilistic interpretation of the final rankings in AHP,” Eur. J. Oper. Res., vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 371–378, Jan. 1997.
22. B. N. Nikolova, D. Dimitrakiev, and K. Tenekedjiev, “Fuzzy rationality in the elicitation of subjective probabilities,” in Proc. 2nd Int. IEEE Conf. Intell. Syst., 2004, vol. 3, pp. 27–31.