A relevance-theoretic account of be going to

Journal of Linguistics

Volumn 33, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 355-377

  Nicolle, Steve ^a  

^a MIDDLESEX UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85007990061     PISSN: 00222267     EISSN: 14697742     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0022226797006567     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Blakemore, D. (1987). Semantic constraints on relevance. Oxford: Blackwell.
2. Binnick, R. I. (1972). Will and be going to II. In Papers from the. th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.
3. Bybee, J. L. (1985). Morphology: a study of the relation between meaning and form. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
4. Bybee, J. L., Perkins, R. D. & Pagliuca, W. (1994). The evolution of grammar: tense, aspect and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
5. Carston, R. (1993). Conjunction, explanation and relevance. Lingua 90. 27-48.
6. Chung, S. & Timberlake, A. (1985). Tense, aspect and mood. In Shopen, T. (ed.) Language typology and syntactic description. Vol. III : grammatical categories and the lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 202-258.
7. Coates, J. (1983). The semantics of the modal auxiliaries. London: Croom Helm.
8. Contini-Morava, E. (1989). Discourse pragmatics and semantic categorization : the case of negation and tense-aspect with special reference to Swahili. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
9. Durst-Andersen, P. (1986). Russian qualitative aspect: referential and propositional semantics. In Sùrensen, F. (ed.) Aspects of aspect. Copenhagen: Cebal. 27-57.
10. Durst-Andersen, P. (1992). Mental grammar: Russian aspect and related issues. Columbus, OH: Slavica.
11. Fries, C. C. (1927). The Expression of the Future. Language 3. 87-95.
12. Groefsema, M. (1995). Can, may, must and should: a relevance theoretic account. Journal of Linguistics 31, 53-79.
13. Haegeman, L. (1983). The semantics of will in present-day British English: a unified account. Brussels: Paleis der Academien.
14. Haegeman, L. (1989). Be going to and will : a pragmatic account. Journal of Linguistics 25, 291-317.
15. Jucker, A. H. (1993). The discourse marker well : a relevance-theoretical account. Journal of Pragmatics 19. 435-452.
16. Klinge, A. (1993). The English modal auxiliaries : from lexical semantics to utterance interpretation. Journal of Linguistics 29, 315-357.
17. Langacker, R. W. (1983). Foundations of cognitive grammar. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.
18. Leech, G. N. (1971). Meaning and the English verb. London: Longman.
19. Leech, G. N. (1987). Meaning and the English verb. (2nd edition.) London: Longman.
20. Matthews, R. (1989) Reference time and modality. In Schopf, A. (ed.) Essays on tensing in English. Vol. II : time, text and modality. Tubingen: Niemeyer. 189-246.
21. McCawley, J. D. (1971). Tense and time reference in English. In Fillmore, C. J. & Langendoen, D. T. (eds.) Studies in linguistic semantics. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. 97-113.
22. McIntosh, A. (1966). Predictive statements. In Bazell, C. E. et al. (eds.) In memory of J. R. Firth. London: Longman. 303-320.
23. Nicolle, S. (1995). In defence of relevance theory: a belated reply to Gorayska and Lindsay, and Jucker. Journal of Pragmatics 23. 677-681.
24. Palmer, F. R. (1979). Modality and the English modals. London: Longman.
25. Recanati, F. (1989). The pragmatics of what is said. Mind and Language 4. 295-329.
26. Sperber, D. & Wilson, D. (1986). Relevance: communication and cognition. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
27. Swinney, D. A. (1979). Lexical access during sentence comprehension: (re)considerations of context effects. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour 18. 645-659.
28. Walton, A. L. (1991). The semantics and pragmatics of can. Linguistische Berichte 135. 325-345.
29. Wekker, H. (1976). The expression of future time in contemporary British English. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
30. Wilson, D. & Sperber, D. (1993). Linguistic form and relevance. Lingua 90. 1-25.