The Role of the Rehabilitation Provider in Occupational Rehabilitation: Providing for Whom? Part 2: Perceptions of Key Stakeholders

The Australian Journal of Rehabilitation Counselling

Volumn 4, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 111-122

  Kenny, Dianna T ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85007972662     PISSN: 13238922     EISSN: 18386059     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S1323892200001307     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. Craig, G. & La Grow, S. (1999). Developing a new service model and meaningful services evaluation: Facing the challenge in Australia. Paper presented at Vision 99, the International Conference on Low Vision. New York: NY, USA, July.
2. De Jong, G. (1997). Value perspective and the challenge of managed care. In M.J. Fuhrer (Ed), Assessing medical rehabilitation practices: The promise of outcomes research, (pp. 61-90). Baltimore, MD, Paul H. Brookes Publishing.
3. Johnston, M., Stineman, M. & Velozo, C. (1997). Outcomes research in medical rehabilitation: Foundations from the past and directions for the future. In M.J. Fuhrer (Ed), Assessing medical rehabilitation practices: The promise of outcomes research, (pp. 1-42). Baltimore, MD, Paul H. Brookes Publishing.
4. Wade, D.T. (1998). A framework for considering rehabilitation interventions. Clinical Rehabilitation, 12, 363-367.
5. Whiteneck, G. (1994). Measuring what matters: Key rehabilitation outcomes. Arch Phys Med Rehobil, 75, 1073-1076.