A variable syntax of speech, gesture, and sound effect: Direct quotations in Spanish

Language Variation and Change

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 43-83

  Cameron, Richard ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85007940416     PISSN: 09543945     EISSN: 14698021     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0954394500001216     Document Type: Article

References (96)

1. Alcina Franch, Juan, & Manuel Blecua, Josd. (1975). Gramatica espanola. Barcelona: Editorial Ariel.
2. Banfield, Ann. (1982). Unspeakable sentences: Narration and representation in the language of fiction. Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
3. Bayley, Robert, & Pease-Alvarez, Lucinda. (1997). Null pronoun variation in Mexican-descent children's narrative discourse. Language Variation and Change 9: 349-371.
4. Baynham, Mike. (1996). Direct speech: What's it doing in non-narrative discourse. Journal of Pragmatics 25: 61-81.
5. Bell, Allan. (1984). Language style as audience design. Language in Society 13: 145-204.
6. Blyth, Carl, Kecktenwald, Sigrid, & Wang, Jenny. (1990). I'm like, “Say what?!”: Anew quotative in American oral narrative. American Speech 65: 215-227.
7. Briggs, Charles (1992). “Since I am a woman, I will chastise my relatives”: Gender, reported speech, and the (re)production of social relations in Warao ritual wailing. American Ethnologist 19: 337-361.
8. Brucart, Josd M. (1987). La elision sintactica en espanol. Bellatterra: Universitat Autbnoma de Barcelona.
9. Buck, Carl. (1915a). Words of speaking and saying in the Indo-European languages: First paper. American Journal of Philology 36: 1-18.
10. Buck, Carl. (1915b). Words of speaking and saying in the Indo-European languages: Second paper. American Journal of Philology 36: 125-154.
11. Cameron, Richard. (1992). Pronominal and null subject variation in Spanish: Constraints, dialects, and functional compensation. Doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.
12. Cameron, Richard. (1993). Ambiguous agreement, functional compensation, and nonspecific tu in the Spanish of San Juan, Puerto Rico and Madrid, Spain. Language Variation and Change 5: 305-334.
13. Cameron, Richard. (1995). The scope and limits of switch reference as a constraint on pronominal subject expression. Hispanic Linguistics 6/7: 1-27.
14. Cameron, Richard. (1996). A community-based test of a linguistic hypothesis. Language in Society 25: 61-111.
15. Cameron, Richard. (1997). Accessibility theory in a variable syntax of Spanish. Journal of Pragmatics 28: 29-67.
16. Chafe, Wallace. (1994). Discourse, consciousness, and time. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
17. Chambers, J. K. (1995). Sociolinguistic theory. Oxford: Blackwell.
18. Clark, Herbert, & Gerrig, Richard. (1990). Quotations as demonstrations. Language 66: 764-805.
19. Coulmas, Florian. (1986a). Direct and indirect speech. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
20. Coulmas, Florian. (1986b). Reported speech: Some general issues. In Florian Coulmas (Ed.), Direct and indirect speech. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 1-28.
21. Declerck, Renaat, & Tanaka, Kazuhiko. (1996). Constraints on tense choice in reported speech. Studio Linguistica 50: 283-301.
22. Dines, Elizabeth. (1980). Variation in discourse-“and stuff like that.” Language in Society 9: 13-31.
23. Eckert, Penelope. (1989). The whole woman: Sex and gender differences in variation. Language Variation and Change 1: 245-267.
24. Ehrlich, Susan. (1990). Point of view: A linguistic analysis of literary style. London: Routledge.
25. Fasold, Ralph. (1990). The sociolinguistics of language. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
26. Ferrara, Kathleen, & Bell, Barbara. (1995). Sociolinguistic variation and discourse function of constructed dialogue introducers: The case of BE + LIKE. American Speech 70: 265-290.
27. Frege, Gottlob. (1980). On sense and meaning. In Peter Geach & Max Black (Eds.), Translations from the philosophical writings of Gottlob Frege (3rd ed.). Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Littlefield. 56-78.
28. Goffman, Erving. (1961). Encounters: Two studies in the sociology of interaction. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill.
29. Goffman, Erving. (1979). Footing. Semiotica 25: 1-29.
30. Guy, Gregory. (1990). The sociolinguistic types of language change. Diachronica 7: 47-67.
31. Guy, Gregory, Horvath, Barbara, Vonwiller, Julia, Daisley, Elaine, & Rogers, Inge. (1986). An into-national change in progress in Australian English. Language in Society 15: 23-52.
32. Haberland, Hartmut. (1986). Reported speech in Danish. In Florian Coulmas (Ed.), Direct and indirect speech. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 219-253.
33. Harris, Zellig. (1952). Discourse analysis. Language 28: 1-30.
34. Heritage, John. (1984). A change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential placement. In J. Maxwell Atkinson & John Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 299-345.
35. Herman, David. (1995). Universal grammar and narrative form. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
36. Horvath, Barbara, & Sankoff, David. (1987). Delimiting the Sydney speech community. Language in Society 16: 179-204.
37. Johnson-Laird, Philip. (1983). Mental models. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
38. Johnstone, Barbara. (1987). “He says. so I said”: Verb tense alternation and narrative depictions of authority in American English. Linguistics 25: 33-52.
39. Kendon, Adam. (1992). Some recent work from Italy on quotable gestures (emblems). Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 21: 92-108.
40. Kuroda, S.-Y. (1973). Where epistemology, style, and grammar meet: A case study from Japanese. In Stephen Anderson & Paul Kiparsky (Eds.), A festschrift for Morris Halle. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. 377-391.
41. Kvavik, Karen. (1986). Characteristics of direct and reported speech prosody: Evidence from Spanish. In Florian Coulmas (Ed.), Direct and indirect speech. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 333-360.
42. Labov, William. (1972a). Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
43. Labov, William. (1972b). Language in the inner city: Studies in the Black English vernacular. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
44. Labov, William. (1984). Field methods of the project on linguistic change and variation. In John Baugh & Joel Sherzer (Eds.), Language in use: Readings in sociolinguistics. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. 28-52.
45. Labov, William. (1990). The intersection of sex and social class in the course of linguistic change. Language Variation and Change 2: 205-254.
46. Labov, William. (1996). When intuitions fail. In Lisa McNair, Kora Singer, Lise Dobrin, & Michelle Aucoin (Eds.), CLS 32: Papers from the parasession on theory and data in linguistics. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society. 77-105.
47. Larson, Mildred. (1978). The functions of reported speech in discourse. Dallas: Summer Institute of Linguistics and University of Texas at Arlington.
48. Lavandera, Beatriz. (1984). Variacion y significado. Buenos Aires: Librerfa Hachette.
49. Leech, Geoffrey, & Short, Michael. (1981). Style in fiction: A linguistic introduction to English fictional prose. London: Longman.
50. Li, Charles. (1986). Direct and indirect speech: Afunctional study. In Florian Coulmas (Ed.), Direct and indirect speech. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 29-45.
51. Lobeck, Anne. (1995). Ellipsis: Functional heads, licensing, and identification. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
52. Löpez Morales, Humberto. (1983). Estratificacion social del espanol de San Juan de Puerto Rico. Ciudad Universitaria, Mdxico: Universidad Nacional Autönoma de Mexico.
53. Lucy, John. (1993a). Reflexive language: Reported speech and metapragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
54. Lucy, John. (1993b). Reflexive language and the human disciplines. In John Lucy (Ed.), Reflexive language: Reported speech and metapragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 9-32.
55. Maldonado, Concepciön (1991). Discurso directo y discurso indirecto. Madrid: Taurus Universitaria.
56. Marslen-Wilson, William, Levy, Elena, & Tyler, Lorraine Komisaijevsky. (1982). Producing interpretable discourse: The establishment and maintenance of reference. In Robert Jarvella & Wolfgang Klein (Eds.), Speech, place, and action: Studies in deixis and related topics. New York: Wiley. 339-378.
57. Mathis, Terrie, & Yule, George. (1994). Zero quotatives. Discourse Processes 18: 63-76.
58. Mayes, Patricia. (1990). Quotation in spoken English. Studies in Language 14: 325-363.
59. Maynard, Senko. (1996). Multivoicedness in speech and thought representation: The case of selfquotation in Japanese. Journal of Pragmatics. 25: 207-226.
60. Medina-Rivera, Antonio. (1996). Discourse genre, type of situation, and topic of conversation in relation to phonological variables in Puerto Rican Spanish. In Jennifer Arnold et al. (Eds.), Sociolinguistic variation: Data, theory, and analysis. Stanford, CA: CSLI. 209-222.
61. Moore, Robert. (1993). Performance form and the voices of characters in five versions of the Wasco Coyote cycle. In John Lucy (Ed.), Reflexive language: Reported speech and metapragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 213-240.
62. Morales, Amparo, & Vaquero, Maria. (1990). El habla culta de San Juan: Materiales para su estudio. Ri'o Piedras, Puerto Rico: Editorial de la Universidad de Puerto Rico.
63. Partee, Barbara. (1973). The syntax and semantics of quotation. In Stephen Anderson & Paul Kipar-sky (Eds.), A festschrift for Morris Halle. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston. 410-418.
64. Pascal, Roy. (1977). The dual voice: Free indirect speech and its functioning in the nineteenth-century European novel. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
65. Pereira Scherre, Maria Marta, & Naro, Anthony. (1991), Marking in discourse: “Birds of a feather.” Language Variation and Change 3: 23-32.
66. Pereira Scherre, Maria Marta, & Naro, Anthony. (1992). The serial effect on internal and external variables. Language Variation and Change 4: 1-13.
67. Philips, Susan. (1986). Reported speech as evidence in an American trial. In Deborah Tannen & James Alatis. (Eds.), GURT ‘85. Languages and linguistics: The interdependence of theory, data, and application. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press. 154-170.
68. Pintzuk, Susan. (1986). VARBRUL: Version 2. 1. Philadelphia: Department of Linguistics, University of Pennsylvania.
69. Pratt, Mary Louise. (1977). Toward a speech act theory of literary discourse. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
70. Real Academia Espanola. (1996). Esbozo de una nueva gramatica de la lengua espanola. Madrid: Espasa Calpe.
71. Reyes, Graciela. (1984). Polifonia textual: La citacidn en el relato literario. Madrid: Gredos.
72. Reyes, Graciela. (1993). Los procedimientos de cita: Estilo directo y estilo indirecto. Madrid: Arco/Libros.
73. Reyes, Graciela. (1994). Los procedimientos de cita: Citas encubiertas y ecos. Madrid: Arco/Libros.
74. Roeck, Marijke De. (1994). Afunctional topology of speech reports. In Elisabeth Engberg-Pedersen, Lisbeth Falster Jakobsen, & Lone Schack Rasmussen (Eds.), Function and expression in functional grammar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 331-351.
75. Romaine, Suzanne, & Lange, Deborah. (1991). The use of like as a marker of reported speech and thought: A case of grammaticalization in progress. American Speech 66: 227-279.
76. Rumsey, Alan. (1990). Wording, meaning, and linguistic ideology. American Anthropologist 92: 346-361.
77. Sanders, Josö, & Redeker, Gisela. (1996). Perspective and the representation of speech and thought in narrative discourse. In Gilles Fauconnier & Eve Sweetser (Eds.), Spaces, worlds, and grammar. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 290-317.
78. Santa Ana, Otto, & Parodi, Claudia. (1998). Evaluation and linguistic variable types in the Mexican Spanish setting: A speech community model. Language in Society 27: 23-52.
79. Silva-Corvaldn, Carmen. (1982). Subject expression and placement in Mexican-American Spanish. In Jon Amastae & Luci'a Elfas-Olivares (Eds.), Spanish in the United States: Sociolinguistic aspects. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 93-120.
80. Silva-Corvaldn, Carmen. (1989). Sociolingiiistica: Teoria y andlisis. Madrid: Editorial Alhambra.
81. Sperber, Dan, & Wilson, Deirdre. (1995). Relevance: Communication and cognition (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.
82. Tannen, Deborah. (1986). Introducing constructed dialogue in Greek and American conversational and literary narrative. In Florian Coulmas (Ed.), Direct and indirect speech. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 311-332.
83. Tannen, Deborah. (1987). Repetition and variation as spontaneous formulaicity in conversation. Language 63: 574-605.
84. Tannen, Deborah. (1989). Talking voices: Repetition, dialogue, and imagery in conversational discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
85. Thompson, Geoff. (1996). Voices in the text: Discourse perspectives on language reports. Applied Linguistics 17: 501-530.
86. Urban, Greg. (1993). The represented functions of speech in Shokleng myth. In John Lucy (Ed.), Reflexive language: Reported speech and metapragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 241-259.
87. Verdin Diaz, Guillermo. (1970). Introduccidn al estilo indirecto libre en espanol. Revista de Filologla Espanola, Anejo XCI.
88. Vincent, Diane, & Dubois, Sylvie. (1996). A study of the use of reported speech in spoken language. In Jennifer Arnold et al. (Eds.), Sociolinguistic variation: Data, theory, and analysis. Stanford, CA: CSLI. 361-374.
89. Wald, Benji. (1987). Spanish-English grammatical contact in Los Angeles: The grammar of reported speech in the East Los Angeles contact vernacular. Linguistics 25: 53-80.
90. Waugh, Linda. (1995). Reported speech in journalistic discourse: The relation of function and text. Text 15: 129-173.
91. Wierzbicka, Anna. (1974). The semantics of direct and indirect discourse. Papers in Linguistics 7: 267-307.
92. Winsford, Donald. (1996). The problem of syntactic variation. In Jennifer Arnold et al. (Eds.), Sociolinguistic variation: Data, theory, and analysis. Stanford, CA: CSLI. 177-192.
93. Young, Richard, & Bayley, Robert. (1996). VARBRUL analysis for second language acquisition research. In Robert Bayley & Dennis Preston (Eds.), Second language acquisition and linguistic variation. Philadelphia: Benjamins. 253-306.
94. Yule, George, & Mathis, Terrie. (1992). The role of staging and constructed dialogue in establishing speaker's topic. Linguistics 30: 199-215.
95. Zagona, Karen. (1988). Verb phrase syntax: A parametric study of English and Spanish. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
96. Zentella, Ana Celia. (1997). Growing up bilingual: Puerto Rican children in New York. Oxford: Blackwell.