Design for adoption: The development of an integrated web-based education environment

Journal of Research on Computing in Education

Volumn 30, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 307-328

  Zhao, Yong ^a  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Distance learning; Instructional design; Interactive learning environments; Internet; World Wide Web

Indexed keywords

EID: 85007839701     PISSN: 08886504     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08886504.1998.10782229     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Antonioni, D. (1994). The effects of feedback accountability on upward appraisal ratings. Personnel Psychology, 47, 349-356.
2. Apple Computer. (1995). Changing the conversation about teaching, learning, and technology: A report on 10 years of ACOT research. Cupertino, CA: Author.
3. Bell, R, Davis, E. A., 86 Linn, M. C. (1995). The knowledge integration environment: Theory and design. In J. L. Schnase & E. L. Cunnius (Eds.), Proceedings of CSCL ‘95: The first international conference on computer support for collaborative learning (pp, 14-21), Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
4. Blease, D., & Cohen, L. (1990), Coping with computers: An ethnographic study in primary classrooms. London: Paul Chapman.
5. Bruce, B. C., Peyton, J. K., & Batson, T. (1993). Network-based classrooms. New York: Cambridge University Press.
6. Bump, J. (1990). Radical changes in class discussion using networked computers. Computers and the Humanities, 24, 49-65.
7. Campbell, K., & Zhao, Y. (1996). Refining knowledge in a virtual community: A case-based collaborative project for preservice teachers. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 4(3/4), 263-280.
8. Campione, J. C., Brown, A. L., & Jay, M. (1992), Computers in a community of learners. In E, D. Corte, M, C. Linn, H. Mandl, & L. Verschaffel (Eds.), Computer-based learning environments and problem solving (pp. 163-188). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
9. Christiansen, E., & Dirckinck-Holmfeld, L. (1995). Making distance learning collaborative. In J. L. Schnase & E. L. Cunnius (Eds.), Proceedings of CSCL ‘95: The first international conference on computer support for collaborative learning (pp. 57-61). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
10. Cohen, D. K. (1988). Educational technology and school organization. In R. S. Nickerson Si P. Zodhiates (Eds.), Technology and education: Looking toward 2020 (pp. 231-264). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
11. Collins, A. (1991). The role of computer technology in restructuring schools. Phi Beta Kappan, 73(1), 28-36.
12. Cornu, B. (1995). New technologies: Integration into education. In D. Watson & D. Tinsley (Eds.), Integrating information technology into education (pp. 3-12). London: Chapman & Hall.
13. Cuban, L. (1986). Teachers and machines: The classroom use of technology since 1920. New York: Teachers College Press.
14. Cuban, L. (1993). Computers meet classroom: Classroom wins. Teachers College Record, 95(2), 185-210.
15. Cziko, G. A. (1995). Without miracles: Universal selection theory and the second Darwinian revolution. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
16. Desieno, R. (1995). The faculty and digital technology. EduCom Review, 30(4), 47-48.
17. Duckett, G., Painter, W., Gay, M., Gerson, D., Moore, T. L., & Wallet, K. B. (1995). Athena University VOU and GENII: A model of conceptual change and collaboration. In J. L. Schnase & E. L. Cunnius (Eds.), Proceedings of CSCL ‘95: The first international conference on computer support for collaborative learning (pp. 94-98). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
18. Dwyer, D. C., Ringstaff, C., & Sandholtz, J. H. (1991). Changes in teachers’ beliefs and practices in technology-rich classrooms. Educational Leadership, 48(8), 45-52.
19. Edelson, D. C., O’Neill, D. K., Gomez, L. M., & D’Amico, L. (1995). A design for effective support of inquiry and collaboration. In J. L. Schnase & E. L. Cunnius (Eds.), Proceedings of CSCL ‘95 (pp. 107-111). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
20. Ellis, J. D. (1992), Teacher development in advanced educational technology. Journal of Science and Technology, 1 (pp. 49-65).
21. Ellison, P. A., Govern, J. M., Petri, H. L., & Figler, M. H. (1995). Anonymity and aggressive driving behavior: A field study. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 10(1), 265-272.
22. Eraut, M. (1991). The information society: A challenge for education policies? In M, Eraut (Ed.), Education and the information society (pp. 15-33). London: Cassell.
23. Fishman, B., & Pea, R. D. (1994). Proactive policy for the internetworked school: A proposal emerging from the Co Vis Project. Technos: Quarterly of Education and Technology, 3(1), 22-26.
24. Fullan, M. (1982). The meaning of educational change. New York: Teachers College Press.
25. Garner, R., & Gillingham, M. (1996). Internet communication in six classrooms: Conversations across time, space, and culture. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
26. Gordin, G. N., Gomez, L. M., Pea, R. D., & Fishman, B.J, (1995). Using the World Wide Weh to huild learning communities in K-12 [Online]. Available: Http://www.covis.nwu.edu/Papers/kl2web.html/.
27. Gordon, R. A., SC Stuecher, U. (1992). The effect of anonymity and increased accountability on the linguistic complexity of teaching evaluations. The Journal of Psychology, 126(6), 639-649.
28. Hodas, S. (1993). Technology refusal and the organizational nature of schools. Education Policy Analysis Archive, 1(10), 1-19.
29. Honey, M. & Moeller, B. (1990). Teachers’ beliefs and technology integration: Different values, different understandings (Technical Report No. 6). New York: Center for Technology in Education. (ERIC No, ED 326 203)
30. Jessup, L. M., Connolly, T., & Tansik, D. A. (1990). Toward a theory of automated group work: The deindividuating effects of anonymity. Small Group Research, 21(3), 333-348.
31. Koschmann, T., Newman, D., Woodruff, E., Pea, R., & Rowley, P. (1993). Technology and pedagogy for collaborative problem solving as a context for learning: Report on a CSCW ‘92 workshop. ACM SIGCHI Bulletin, 25(4), 57-60.
32. Loveless, T. (1996). Why aren’t computers used more in schools? Educational Policy, 10(4), 448-467.
33. Means, B. (1994). Introduction: Using technology to advance educational goals. In B. Means (Ed.), Technology and educational reform: The reality behind the promise (pp. 1-22). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
34. Michaels, S. (1990). The computer as a dependent variable. Theory into Practice, 29(4), 246-255.
35. Miller, L., Sc Olson, J. (1994). Putting the computer in its place: A study of teaching with technology. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 26, 121-141.
36. Newman, D. (1992). Technology as support for school structure and restructuring. Phi Delta Kappan, 74(4), 308-315.
37. Newman, D. (1994). Computer networks: Opportunities or obstacles? In B. Means (Ed.) Technology and education reform: The reality behind the promise (pp. 57-80). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
38. Niederhauser, D. S., & Stoddart, T. (1994, April). Teacher’s perspectives on computer-assisted instruction: Transmission versus construction of knowledge. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA. (ERIC No. ED 374 116)
39. Office of Technology Assessment. (1995). Teachers and technology: Making the connection. Washington, DC: Author.
40. O’Neill, D. K., & Gomez, L. (1994). The Collaboratory Notebook: A distributed knowledge-building environment for project-enhanced learning. In T. Ottmann & I. Tomek (Eds.), Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 1994: Proceedings of Ed-Media ‘94 (pp. 416-423). Charlottesville, VA: A ACE.
41. Olson, J. (1995). Classroom ethos and the concerns of the teacher. In D. Watson 6C D. Tinsley (Eds.) Integrating information technology into education (pp. 51-58). London: Chapman and Hall.
42. Owston, R. D. (1997). The World Wide Web: A technology to enhance teaching and learning? Educational Researcher, 26(2), 27-33.
43. Perkinson, H.J. (1984). Learning from our mistakes: A reinterpretation of twentieth-century educational theory. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
44. Ragsdale, R. (1992). Making computer tools effective in classrooms. In Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Technology Education (pp. 680-691). Austin, TX: University of Texas.
45. Riel, M. (1992). A functional analysis of educational telecomputing: A case study of learning circles. Interactive Learning Environments, 2, 15-29.
46. Ryser, G. R., Beeler, J. E., & McKenzie, C. M. (1995). Effects of a computer- supported intentional learning environment (CSILE) on students’ self-concept, self-regulatory behavior, and critical thinking ability. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 13(4), 375-385.
47. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1991). An architecture for collaborative knowledge building. In E. D. Corte, M. C. Linn, H. Mandl, & L. Verschaffel (Eds.), Computer-based learning environments and problem solving (pp. 41-66). Berlin: Spinger-Verlag.
48. Shotsberger, P. G., Smith, K. B., & Spell, C. G. (1995). Collaborative distance education on the World Wide Web: What would that look like? In J. L. Schnase & E. L. Cunnius (Eds.), Proceedings of CSCL ‘95: The first international conference on computer support for collaborative learning (pp. 312-316). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
49. Stahl, G., Sumner, T., & Repenning, A. (1995). Internet repositories for collaborative learning: Supporting both students and teachers. In J. L, Schnase & E. L. Cunnius (Eds.), Proceedings of CSCL ‘95: The first international conference on computer support for collaborative learning (pp. 321-328). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
50. Thurston, C. O., Secaras, E. D., & Levin, J. A. (1996). Teaching Teleapprenticeships: An innovative model for technology integration in teacher education. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 28(5) [Special online issue]. Available: Http://www2.educ.ksu.edu/projects/JRCE/v28-5/Thurston/article/main.htm.
51. United States Advisory Council on the National Information Infrastructure, (1995). A nation of opportunity: Realizing the promise of the Information Superhighway. Washington, DC: Author. (ERIC No. ED 393 473)
52. Valacich, J. S., Dennis, A. R., & Nunamaker, J. F. (1992). Group size and anonymity effects on computer-mediated idea generation. Small Group Research, 23(1), 49-73.
53. Veen, W. (1995). Factors affecting the use of computers in the classroom: Four case studies. In D.Watson & D.Tinsley (Eds.), Integrating information technology into education (pp. 169-184). London: Chapman Sc Hall.
54. Vickers, M., & Smalley, J. (1995). Integrating computers into classroom teaching: Cross-national perspectives. In D. N. Perkins, J. L. Schwartz, M. M. West, & M. S. Wiske (Eds,), Software goes to school: Teaching for understanding with new technologies (pp.271-282). New York: Oxford University Press.
55. Woolley D. R. (1997). Conferencing on the World Wide Web: A guide to software that powers discussion forums on the Web [Online]. Available: Http://freenet, msp, mn.us/people/drwool/webconf, html.
56. Zhao, Y. (1995, June). From technology of teaching to technology of learning: Creating a virtual community of learners on the Internet. Paper presented at World Conference on Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, Graz, Austria.
57. Zhao, Y, (1997, March). The effects of anonymity on peer feedback in computermediated collaborative learning. Paper presented at the annual meeting of American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
58. Zimbardo, P. G. (1970), The human choice: Individuation, reason, and order versus deindividuation, impulse, and chaos. In W.J. Arnold & D, Levine (Eds.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, Vol. 17 (pp, 237-307), Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.