Undergraduate education majors' discourse on an electronic mailing list

Journal of Research on Technology in Education

Volumn 35, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 117-138

  Overbaugh, Richard C ^a  

^a OLD DOMINION UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

E mail electronic discourse; Electronic mailing list; Preservice teachers

Indexed keywords

EID: 85007839619     PISSN: 15391523     EISSN: 19450818     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15391523.2002.10782374     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Apple Works [Computer software]. (1997). Cupertino, CA: Apple.
2. Barab, S. A., Thomas, M. K., & Merrill, H. (2001). Online learning: From information dissemination to fostering collaboration. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 12(1), 105-143.
3. Bellack, A. A., Kliebard, H. M., Hyman, R. T., & Smith, F. L., Jr. (1966). The language of the classroom. New York: Teachers College Press.
4. Chou, C. C. (2001). Formative evaluation of synchronous CMC systems for a learner-centered online course. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 12(213), 173-192.
5. Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (1996). Looking at technology in context: A framework for understanding technology and educational research. In D. C. Berliner & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psy-chology (pp. 807-840). New York: Simon & Schuster Macmillan.
6. Communicator [Computer software]. (1995-2002). Mountain View, CA: Netscape.
7. Grabe, M., & Grabe, C. (1998). Integrating technology for meaning learning. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
8. Internet Explorer [Computer software]. (1995-2001). Redmond, WA: Microsoft.
9. Jaeger, M. (1995). Science teacher in education at a distance. The American Journal of Distance Education, 9(2), 29-49.
10. McDonald, J., & Gibson, C. (1998). Interpersonal dynamics and group development in computer conferencing. The American Journal of Distance Education, 12(1), 7-24.
11. Mikulecky, L. (1998). Diversity discussion, and participation: Comparing Web-based adolescent literature classes. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 42(2), 84-97.
12. Perry, W G. (1970). Forms of intellectual and ethical development in the college years: A scheme. Troy, MO: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
13. Reigeluth, C. M. (1999). Instructional design theories and models: Vol. 2. A new paradigm of instructional theory. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
14. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1994). Computer support for knowledgebuilding communities. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3, 265-283.
15. Schoenfelder, K. R. (1995). Student involvement in the distance education classroom: Teacher and student perceptions of effective instructional methods. In C. Sorenson, C. Schlosser, M. Anderson, & M. Simonson (Eds.), Encyclopedia of distance education research in Iowa (pp. 79-85). Ames, IA: Teacher Education Alliance.
16. Sherry, L. (2000). The nature and purpose of online discourse: A brief synthesis of current research as related to the WEB project. International Journal of Educational Telecommunication, 61 (1), 19-51.
17. Silvernail, D. L., & Johnson, J. J. (1992). The impact of interactive televised instruction on student evaluations of their instructors. Educational Technology, 32(6), 47-50.
18. Slava, K., Paul, C., Juhani, T., & John, S. (2001). When problem solving is superior to studying worked examples. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(3), 58-64.
19. Thomas, L., Clift, R., & Sugimoto, T. (1996). Telecommunication, student teaching, and methods instruction: An exploratory investigation. Journal of Teacher Education, 47(3), 165-174.
20. Van Gorp, M. J. (1998). Computer-mediated communication in preservice teacher education: Survey research, identifYing problems, and considering needs. Journal ofComputing in Teacher Education, 14(2), 8-14.
21. Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychology processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
22. Zhang, S., & Fulford, C. P. (1994). Are interaction time and psychological interactivity the same thing in the distance learning television classroom? Educational Technology, 34(7), 58-64.