Excellence as a standard for all education

Roeper Review

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 9-12

  VanTassel‐Baska, Joyce ^a  

^a Dept of Economics and Thomas Jefferson Program in Public Policy at the College of William and Mary   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85007826542     PISSN: 02783193     EISSN: 1940865X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02783199709553843     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Bloom, B.S. (1985). Developing talent in young people. NY: Ballantine.
2. Bracey, G. (1996). Final exam: A study of the perpetual scrutiny of American education. Washington, DC: Agency for Instructional Technology.
3. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1993). Talented teenagers: The roots of success and failure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4. Darling-Hammond, L. (1991). The implications of testing policy for quality and equality. Phi Delta Kappan, 73, 220-225.
5. Feldman, D. (Ed.) (1983). Developmental conceptions of giftedness. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
6. Gardner, J. (1961). Excellence: Can we be equal and excellent too? NY: Harper.
7. Gross, M.U.M. (1989). The pursuit of excellence or the search for intimacy? The forced-choice dilemma of gifted youth. Roeper Review, 11 (4), 189-194.
8. Henry, W.A. (1994). In defense of elitism. NY: Doubleday.
9. Hoover-Dempsey, K.V., & Sandier, H.M. (1995). Parental involvement in children’s education: Why does it make a difference? Teachers College Record, 97 (2), 310-331.
10. Kozol, J. (1991). Savage inequalities: Children in America’s schools. NY: Crown Publishing, Inc.
11. Margolin, L. (1996). A pedagogy of privilege. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 19 (2), 164-180.
12. Passow, A.H. (1988). Educating gifted persons who are caring and concerned. Roeper Review, 11 (1), 13-15.
13. Paul, R. (1992). Critical thinking: What every person needs to survive in a rapidly changing world. Sonoma, CA: Critical Thinking Foundation.
14. Roeper, A. (1996). A personal statement of philosophy of George & Annemarie Roeper. Roeper Review, 19(1), 18-19.
15. Sapon-Shevin, M. (1995). Why gifted students belong in inclusive schools. Educational Leadership, 52 (4), 64-68,70.
16. Shulman, L.S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1-22.
17. Silverman, L. (1993). Counseling the gifted and talented. Denver, CO: Love Publishing Company.
18. Stanley, J. (1990). My many years of working with the gifted: An academic approach. The fourth lecture in the series. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 360790.)
19. Stevenson, H.W., & Stigler, J. (1992). The learning gap: Why our schools are failing and what we can learn from Japanese and Chinese education. NY: Simon & Schuster.