Gifted students and cooperative learning: A study of grouping strategies

Roeper Review

Volumn 21, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 315-

  Melser, Nancy Armstrong ^a  

^a BALL STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85007801845     PISSN: 02783193     EISSN: 1940865X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02783199909553983     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Archambault, F. X., Westberg, K., Brown, S. B., Hallmark, B. W, Emmons, C. L., & Zhang, W. (1993). Regular classroom practices u ith gifted students Results of a national survey of classroom teachers Storrs, CT: The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented.
2. Bloom, B S. (Ed). (1985). Developing talent in young people. New York: Ballantine Books.
3. Bones, D. (Ed.). (1994). Getting Started A Guide to Bringing Environmental Education Into Your Classroom. University of Michigan Ann Arbor.
4. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Literacy and intrinsic motivation Daedalus, 119, 115-140.
5. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human
6. Dewey, J. (1913). Interest and effort in education New York1 Houghton Mifflin Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education New York: Houghton Mifflin.
7. Gallagher, J. J, (1985) Teaching the gifted child (3rd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
8. Gentry, M. L. (1990). The Environmental Interest-a-Lyzer. Unpublished program instrument Coldwater, MI. Branch ISD.
9. Gentry, M. L. (1996). Cluster grouping An investigation of student achievement, identification, and classroom practices Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT.
10. Goodlad, J. I. (1984). A place called school New York: McGraw Hill
11. Gruber, H. E. (1986). The self-construction of the extraordinary. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 247-268). Cambridge, MA: Cambndge University Press.
12. Holt, J. (1983). Escape from childhood. In J. W. Noll (Ed.), Taking sides' Clashing on controversial educational issues (2nd ed.) (pp 40-44). Guilford, CT: Dushkin Publishing Group
13. James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology London: MacMillan.
14. Kulik, J. A. (1992). An analysis of the research on ability grouping Historical and contemporary perspectives Storrs, CT: The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented.
15. Maker, C. J. (1982) Curriculum development for the gifted Austin, TX: Pro-Ed
16. Parke, B. (1989). Gifted students in regular classrooms Boston Allyn & Bacon.
17. Passow, A. H (1982) The relationship between the regular curriculum and differentiated curricula for the gifted/talented. In Selected proceedings of the first national conference on curricula for the gifted! talented Ventura, CA: Ventura Superintendent of Schools Office
18. Phenix, PH (1964). Realms of meaning New York: McGraw-Hill.
19. Reis, S. M, Gentry, M L., & Park, S. (1995). Extending the pedagogy of gifted education to all students The enrichment cluster study Storrs, CT: National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented
20. Reis, S. M., Westberg, K. L., Kuhkowich, J, Caillard, F., Hebrew, T. J., Purcell, J. H., Rogers, J. B, & Smist, J. M. (1993). Why not let high ability students start school in January7 The curriculum compacting study Storrs, CT: The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented.
21. Renzulli, J. S. (1977). The enrichment triad model Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press
22. Renzulli, J S. (1978). What makes giftedness? Reexamining a definition. Phi Delta Kappan, 60(3), 180-184,261.
23. Renzulli, J. S. (1988) The multiple menu model for developing differentiated curriculum for the gifted and talented. Gifted Child Quarterly, 32,298-308.
24. Renzulli, J. S. (1994) Schools for talent development A comprehensive plan for total school improvement Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
25. Renzulli, J. S, & Reis, S. M. (1985) The schoolwide enrichment model A comprehensive plan for educational excellence Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press
26. Robinson, A (1991). Cooperative learning and the academically talented student. Storrs, CT: The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented.
27. Rogers, K. B. (1991). The relationship of grouping practices to the education of the gifted and talented learner. Storrs, CT: The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented
28. Schiefele, U. (1991). Interests, learning and motivation Educational Psychologist, 26,299-323.
29. Schlichter, C. (1986). Talents unlimited. Applying the multiple talent approach to mainstream and gifted programs. In J. S. Renzulli (Ed.), Systems and models for developing programs for the gifted and talented (pp. 352-390). Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
30. Shore, B. M., Cornell, D. G, Robinson, A, & Ward, V. S. (1991) Recommended practices in gifted education New York: Teachers College Press.
31. Spicker, H H, Southern, W. T., & Davis, B. (1987). The rural gifted child Gifted Child Quarterly, 31(4).
32. Tobias, S. (1994). Interest, prior knowledge and learning Review of Educational Research, 64(1), 37-54.
33. Treffinger, D. (1986). Fostering effective independent learning through individualized programming In J. S. Renzulli (Ed.), Systems and models for developing programs for the gifted and talented (pp 429-460). Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
34. U.S Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement (1993) National excellence' A case for developing America's talent Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
35. Vygotsky, L. S. (1962). Thought and language. Cambndge, MA M I.T. Press.
36. Wang, M. C., & Lindvall, C. M. (1984) Individual differences in school learning environments Theory, research and design. In E. W. Gordon (Ed.), Review of research in education (Vol. 11) (pp. 161-226). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association
37. Ward, V. (1980). Differential education for the gifted. Ventura, CA: Ventura Superintendent of Schools Office