The nature of facework in discussion of everyday problems between friends

Southern Communication Journal

Volumn 70, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 1-14

  Agne, Robert R ^a   White, Cindy H ^b  

^a AUBURN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85007801779     PISSN: 1041794X     EISSN: 19303203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10417940409373308     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Barbee, A. P. (1991, October). The role of emotions and cognitions in the interactive coping process. In R. Baumeister (Chair), Interpersonal causes of emotions. Symposium conducted at the meeting of the Society of Experimental Social Psychologists, Columbus, OH.
2. Barbee, A. P., & Cunningham, M. R. (1995). An experimental approach to social support communications: Interactive coping in close relationships. In B. Burleson (Ed.), Communication yearbook 19 (pp. 381-413). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
3. Barnes, M. K., & Duck, S. (1994). Everyday communicative contexts for social support. In B. R. Burleson & T. L. Albrecht (Eds.), Communication and social support: Messages, interactions, relationships, and community (pp. 175-194). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
4. Brown, P., & Levinson, S. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge Univer-sity Press.
5. Burgoon, J. K., Sterns, L. A., & Dillman, L. (1995). Interpersonal adaptation: Dyadic interaction patterns. New York: Cambridge University Press.
6. Burleson, B. R., & MacGeorge, E. L. (2002). Supportive communication. In M. L. Knapp &J. A. Daly (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal communication (pp. 374-424). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
7. Burleson, B. R., & Samter, W. (1985). Individual differences in the perception of comforting messages: An exploratory investigation. Central States Speech Journal, 36, 39-50.
8. Canary, D. J., & Spitzberg, B. H. (1987). Appropriateness and effectiveness perceptions of conflict strategies. Human Communication Research, 14, 93-118.
9. Caplan, S. E., & Samter, W. (1999). The role of facework in younger and older adults’ evaluations of social support messages. Communication Quarterly, 47, 245-264.
10. Cappella, J. N. (1991). Mutual adaptation and relativity of measurement. In B. M. Montgomery & Duck, S. (Eds), Studying interpersonal interaction (pp. 103-117). New York: Guilford.
11. Clark, R. A., & Delia, J. G. (1997). Individuals’ preferences for friends’ approaches to providing support in distressing situations. Communication Reports, 10, 115-121.
12. Craig, R. T., Tracy, K., & Spisak, F. (1986). The discourse of requests: Assessment of a politeness approach. Human Communication Research, 12, 437-486.
13. Cutrona, C. E. (1986). Behavioral manifestations of social support: A microanalytic investigation. Journal of Personality a? Social Psychology, 51, 201-208.
14. Cutrona, C. E., & Suhr, J. A. (1992). Controllability of stressful events and satisfaction with spouse support behaviors. Communication Research, 19, 154-174.
15. Cutrona, C. E., & Suhr, J. A. (1994). Social support communication in the context of marriage: An analysis of cou-ples’ supportive interaction. In B. R. Burleson, T. L. Albrecht, & I. G. Sarason (Eds.), Communication of social support: Messages, interactions, relationships, and community (pp. 113-135). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
16. Davis, M. H. (1983). Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 113-126.
17. Goldsmith, D.J. (1994). The role of facework in supportive communication. In B. R. Burleson, T. L. Albrecht, & I. G. Sarason (Eds.), Communication of social support: Messages, interactions, relationships, and community (pp. 29-49). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
18. Goldsmith, D.J. (1995). The communicative microdynamics of support. In B. Burleson (Ed.), Communication yearbook 19 (pp. 414-433). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
19. Goldsmith, D.J. (1999). Content-based resources for giving face sensitive advice in troubles talk episodes. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 32, 303-336.
20. Goldsmith, D.J. (2000). Soliciting advice: The role of sequential placement in mitigating face threat. Commu-nication Monographs, 67, 1-19.
21. Goldsmith, D. J., & Dun, S. (1997). Sex differences and similarities in the communication of social support. Journal of Social & Personal Relationships, 14, 317-337.
22. Goldsmith, D.J., & Fitch, K. (1997). The normative context of advice as social support. Human Communication Research, 23, 454-476.
23. Goldsmith, D. J., & MacGeorge, E. L. (2000). The impact of politeness and relationships on perceived quality of advice about a problem. Human Communication Research, 26, 234-263.
24. Gulley, M. R. (1993). Sequential analyses of social support elicitation and provision behaviors. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY.
25. Hecht, M. L. (1978). The conceptualization and measurement of interpersonal communication satisfaction. Human Communication Research, 4, 253-264.
26. Holtgräves, T. (1992). The linguistic realization of face management: Implications for language production and comprehension, person perception, and cross-cultural communication. Social Psychology Quarterly, 55,141-159.
27. Jefferson, G. (1988). On the sequential organization of troubles-talk in ordinary conversation. Social Problems, 35, 418-441.
28. Jones, S. M., & Guerrero, L. A. (2001). The effects of nonverbal immediacy and verbal person centeredness in the emotional support process. Human Communication Research, 27, 567-596.
29. Lim, T. S., & Bowers, J. W. (1991). Facework: Solidarity, approbation, and tact. Human Communication Research, 17, 415-450.
30. MacGeorge, E. L., Lichtman, R. M., & Pressey, L. C. (2002). The evaluation of advice in supportive interactions: Facework and contextual factors. Human Communication Research, 28, 451-463.
31. Miller, R. S., & Lefcourt, H. M. (1982). The assessment of social intimacy. Journal of Personality Assessment, 46, 514-518.
32. Rawlins, W. K. (1991). On enacting friendship and interrogating discourse. In K. Tracy (Ed.), Understanding face-to-face interaction: Issues linking goals and discourse (pp. 101-115). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
33. Trees, A. R. (1999). Nonverbal communication and the support process: Interactional sensitivity in interactions between mothers and young adult children. Unpublished manuscript, University of Colorado, Boulder.
34. Trees, A. R., & Manusov, V. (1998). Managing face concerns in criticism: Integrating nonverbal behaviors as a dimension of politeness in female friendship dyads. Human Communication Research, 24, 564-583.
35. Wilson, S. R., Aleman, C. G., & Leatham, G. B. (1998). Identity implications of influence goals: A revised analysis of face-threatening acts and application to seeking compliance with same-sex friends. Human Communication Research, 25, 64-96.
36. Winstead, B. A., Derlega, V.J., Lewis, R.J., Sanchez-Hucles, J., & Clarke, E. (1992). Friendship, social interaction, and coping with stress. Communication Research, 19, 193-211.