Something old, something new, something borrowed: Themes in the voices of a new generation of feminists

Southern Communication Journal

Volumn 66, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 323-336

  Howry, Allison Lea ^a   Wood, Julia T ^a  

^a University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85007784558     PISSN: 1041794X     EISSN: 19303203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10417940109373211     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Alcolt, L. (1991, Winter). The problem of speaking for others.Cultural Critique, 23,5-31.
2. Bailey, C. (1997). Making waves and drawing lines: The politics of defining the vicissitudes of feminism.Hypatia, 12,17-29.
3. Baumgardner, J., &Richards, A. (2000).Manifesto: Young women, feminism, and the future.New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
4. Belenky, M., Clinchy, B., Goldberger, N., &Tanile, J. (1986).Women's ways of knowing: The development of self, voice, and mind.New York: Basic.
5. Bellafante, G. (1998, June 29). Feminism: it’s all aboutme! Time, pp.54-60.
6. Boston Women’s Health Club Book Collective. (1969).Our bodies, ourselves.New York: Simon and Schuster. [Updated editions appear regularly.The nm our bodies, ourselves: A book for the new millennium(1999) is the latest.]
7. Brownmiller, S. (1970a). The enemy within. In S. Stambler (Compiler), Women’s liberation: Blueprint for the future(pp. 17-23). New York: Ace Books.
8. Brownmiller, S. (1970b). Sisterhood is powerful. In S. Stambler (Compiler), Women's liberation: Blueprint for the future(pp. 141-155). New York: Ace Books.
9. Brumberg, J. (2000, November 24). When girls talk: What it reveals about them and us.Chronicle of Higher Education, pp. B7-B10.
10. Campbell, K. K. (1973). The rhetoric of women’s liberation: An oxymoron.Quarterly Journal of Speech, 59,74-86.
11. Carlson, J., Starace, K., &Villano, A. (1999). The third wave shift.Feminist.com.Online. Available http://www.feminist.com/third.htm. Accessed April 1,1999.
12. Charmaz, K. (1983). The grounded theory method. In R. Emerson (Ed.), Contemporary field research(pp. 109-126). Boston: Little, Brown, and Company.
13. Daly, J. (1996, November 15). Interview with Barbara Findlen.Women's Zone.Online
14. http://www.tri-pod.com/expIore/women/feature/intemews/961115.findIen.html. Accessed May 17,1999.
15. Davis, F. (1991).Moving the mountain: The women's movement in America since 1960.New York: Simon and Schuster.
16. Dow, B. (1997). Politicizing voice.Western Journal of Communication, 15,1-24.
17. Faludi, S. (1991).Backlash: The undeclared war against American women.New York: Crown.
18. Findlen, B. (Ed.). (1995).Listen up: Voices from the next feminist generation.Seattle: Seal Press.
19. Friedan, B. (1963).The feminine mystique.New York: Dell.
20. Friedan, B. (1998).The second stage(new ed.). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
21. Garrod, A., Ward, J., Robinson, T., &Kilkenny, R. (Eds.). (1999).Souls looking back Life stories of growing up Black.New York: Routledge.
22. Gilligan, C. (1982).In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
23. Harding, S. (1991).Whose science? Whose knowledge?: Thinkingfmm women’s lives.New York: Cornell University Press.
24. Harding, S. (1998).Is science be multicultural?Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
25. Heywood, L. (Ed.). (1997).Third wave agenda: Being feminist, doing feminism.Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
26. Howry, A. L. (1998). The next feminist generation: Negotiating contradiction and ambiguity. Unpublished masters thesis, The University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC. Is Feminism Dead? (1998, June 29).Time.
27. Joreen, M. (1970). The bitch manifesto. In S. Firestone &A. Koedt (F.ds.), Notes from the second year: Women’s liberation, Major unitings of the radical feminists(pp. 5-9). New York: Editors.
28. Kempton, S. (1970, July). Cutting loose.Esquire, pp. 53-57.
29. Lempert, L. (1996). Women’s strategies for surviv al: Developing agency in abusive relationships.Journal of Family Violence, 11,269-289.
30. Leveen, L. (1996). Sex and the scholarly girl: Plugging the feminist generation gap.Women’s Studies, 25,19-36.
31. Lorde, A. (1984).Sister outsider.Trumansburg, New York: Crossing Press.
32. Maglin, N., &Perry, D. (Eds.). (1996).“Bad girls”/ “good girls”: Women, sex, and power in the nineties.Boston: Rutgers University Press.
33. Miller, J. (1976).Toward a neio psychology of women.Boston: Beacon.
34. Nichter, M. (2000).Fat talk: What girls and their parents say about dieting.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
35. O’Kelly, C.,8cCarney, L. (1986).W’omen and men in society(2nd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
36. Orr, C. (1997). Charting the currents of the third save.Hypatia, 12,29-46.
37. Owen, W. F. (1984). Interpretive themes in relational communication.Quarterly Journal of Speech, 70,274-287.
38. Piper, M. (1994).Reviving Orphelia: Saving the selves of adolescent girls.New York: Putnam.
39. Rich, A. (1986).Blood, bread and poetryNew York: Norton.
40. Shandler, S. (1999).Orphelia speaks: Adolescent girls write about their search for self.New York: Harper Pemnial.
41. Siegel, D. (1997). The legacy of the personal: Generating theory in feminism’s third wave.Hypatia, 12,46-75.
42. Shulman, A. (1971). Organs and orgasm. In V. Gomick &B. Moran (Eds.), Woman in sexist society(pp. 292-303). New York: Basic Books.
43. Strauss, A., &Corbin, J. (1990).Basics of qualitative analysis.Newbury Park, CA: Sage. The 3rd WWWave.Online. Availablehttp://www.io.com/-wwwave/secondthird/genx.html. Accessed May 24, 1999.
44. Tobias, S. (1997).Faces of feminism.Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
45. Umrigar, T. (1998, August 28). Riding the third wave: Today’s feminists have different demands from those of earlier generations.The Dallas Morning News, p. 5C.
46. Walker, R. (Ed.). (1995).Tobereal: Telling the truth and changing the face of feminism.New York: Anchor Books.
47. Wood, J., Dendy, L, Dordek, E., Germany, M., &Varallo, S. (1994). Dialectic of difference: A thematic analysis of intimates’ meanings for differences. In K. Carter &M. Presnell (Eds.), Interpretive approaches to interpersonal communication(pp. 115-136). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.