Scholarly communities and the discipline of the communication discipline

Southern Communication Journal

Volumn 63, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 169-172

  Dean Farmer, J ^a   Swartz, Omar ^a  

^a NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85007781057     PISSN: 1041794X     EISSN: 19303203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10417949809373087     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Althusser, L. (1971). Lenin and philosophy (B. Brewster, Trans.). New York: Monthly Review Press.
2. Barker, J. R., & Cheney, G. (1994). The concept and the practice of discipline in organizational life. Communication Monographs, 61, 19-43.
3. Behling, O. (1980). The case for the natural science model for research in organizational behavior and organization theory. Academy of Management Review, 5, 483-490.
4. Berger, C. R. (1977). The covering law perspective as a theoretical basis for the study of human communication. Communication Quarterly, 25, 7-18.
5. Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. New York: Anchor.
6. Blair, C., Brown, J. R., & Baxter, L. C. (1994). Disciplining the feminine. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 80, 383-409.
7. Bostrom, R., & Donohew, L. (1992). The case for empiricism: Clarifying fundamental issues in communication theory. Communication Monographs, 59, 109-129.
8. Chambers, R. (1983). Rural development: Putting the last first. New York: John Wiley.
9. Condit, C. M. (1990). The birth of understanding: Chaste science and the harlot of the arts. Communication Monographs, 57, 323-327.
10. Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972-1977. (C. Gordon, Ed.; C. Gordon, L. Marshall, J. Mepham, & K. Soper, Trans.). New York: Pantheon.
11. Funkhouser, E. T. (1996). The evaluative use of citation analysis for communication journals. Human Communication Research, 22, 563-574.
12. Hickson, M., III, Stacks, D. W., & Amsbary, J. H. (1992). Active prolific female scholars in Communication studies: An analysis of research productivity II. Communication Quarterly, 40, 350-356.
13. Katz, E. (1959). Mass communication and the study of popular culture: An editorial note on a possible future for this journal. Studies in Public Communication, 2, 1-6.
14. O'Keefe, D. J. (1975). Logical empiricism and the study of human communication. Speech Monographs, 42, 169-183.
15. Philipsen, G. (1976). Places for speaking in Teamsterville. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 62, 15-25.
16. Philipsen, G. (1975). Speaking "like a man" in Teamsterville: Culture patterns of role enactment in an urban neighborhood. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 61, 13-22.
17. Putnam, L. L., & Pacanowsky, M. E. (Eds.). (1983). Communication and organizations: An interpretive approach. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
18. Rogers, E. M. (1994). A history of communication study: A biographical approach. New York: Free Press.
19. Salner, M. (1986). Validity in human science research. Saybrook Review, 6, 107-130.
20. Schwartzman, R. (1997). Peer review as the enforcement of disciplinary orthodoxy. Southern Communication Journal, 63, 67-75.
21. Slack, J. D., & Allor, M. (1983). The political and epistemological constituents of critical communication research. Journal of Communication, 33 (3), 208-218.
22. Steeves, H. L. (1987). Feminist theories and media studies. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 4, 95-135.
23. Swartz, O. (1997a). Conducting socially responsible research: Critical theory, neo-pragmatism, and rhetorical inquiry Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
24. Swartz, O. (1997b). Disciplining the "other": Engaging Blair, Brown, and Baxter. Southern Communication Journal, 62, 253-256.
25. Toulmin, S. (1983). The construal of reality in modern and postmodern science. In W. J. T. Mitchell (Ed.) The politics of interpretation (pp. 99-117). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.