Why general practitioners do not implement evidence

BMJ

Volumn 324, Issue 7338, 2002, Pages 674-

  Temple, John ^a   de Lusignan, Simon ^b   Wells, Sally ^b   Singleton, Andrew ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^b ST GEORGE'S UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACETYLSALICYLIC ACID; WARFARIN;

CLINICAL PRACTICE; DATA ANALYSIS; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; GENERAL PRACTITIONER; HEART ATRIUM FIBRILLATION; HUMAN; LETTER; MEDICAL LITERATURE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; GENERAL PRACTICE; STANDARD; UNITED KINGDOM;

EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; FAMILY PRACTICE; GREAT BRITAIN; HUMANS;

EID: 85007754940     PISSN: 09598138     EISSN: 14685833     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.324.7338.674     Document Type: Article

References (2)

1. Freeman AC, Sweeney K. Why general practitioners do not implement evidence: qualitative study. BMJ 2001; 323: 1100–1102. (10 October.)
2. Barton S,ed. Clinical evidence. Issue 5. London: BMJ Publishing Group, 2001.