Management of health technologies: An international view

BMJ

Volumn 319, Issue 7220, 1999, Pages 1293-

  Jonsson, Egon ^a   Banta, David ^b  

^a Swedish Council on Technology Assessment in Health Care   (Sweden)

^b TNO   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85007746954     PISSN: 09598138     EISSN: 14685833     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.319.7220.1293     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Banta D, Behney C, Sisk J. Toward rational technology in medicine. In: Springer series on health care and society., Vol 5 New York: Springer, 1981.
2. Drummond M. Economic appraisal of health technology in the European Community. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1987.
3. Warren K, Mosteller F. Doing more good than harm: the evaluation of health care interventions. New York: New York Academy of Sciences, 1993.
4. Altman S, Blendon R. Medical technology: the culprit behind health care costs? Proceedings of the 1977 Sun Valley forum on national health. Washington, DC: United States Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, 1979.
5. Swedish Council on Technology Assessment in Health Care. Moderately elevated blood pressure. J Intern Med 1995; 238 (suppl 737).
6. Banta D. Report from the EUR-ASSESS project. EUR-ASSESS. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 1997; 13: 133-333.
7. Banta D. Health technology assessment and the European Union. Int J Technol Assess Health Care (in press.)
8. Abel-Smith B. Value for money in health services: a comparative study. London: Heinemann, 1976.
9. Mossialos E. The regulation of the EU pharmaceutical market. In: Contract report prepared for the EUR-ASSESS project. London: London School of Economics, 1996.
10. Tunis S, Gelband H. Health care technology in the United States. In: Banta D,Battista R,Gelband H,Jonsson E,eds. Health care technology and its assessment in eight countries. Washington, DC: United States Congress, 1995: 275-334.
11. Mossialos E. Regulating expenditure on medicines in European Union countries. In: Saltman R,Figueras J,Sakellarides C,eds. Critical challenges for health care reform in Europe. Milton Keynes: Open University Press, 1998: 261-286.
12. Banta D, Battista R, Gelband H, Jonsson E. Health care technology and its assessment in eight countries. Washington, DC: United States Congress, 1995.
13. Kessler D, Pape S, Sundwall D. The federal regulation of medical devices. N Engl J Med 1987; 317: 357-366.
14. Brown L. Common sense meets implementation: certificate-of-need regulation in the States. J Health Polit, Policy Law 1983; 8: 480-494.
15. Hillman B. Physicians' acquisition and use of new technology in an era of economic constraints. In: Gelijns A,ed. Technology and health care in an era of limits. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1992.
16. Bos M. Health care technology in the Netherlands. In: Banta D,Battista R,Gelband H,Jonsson E,eds. Health care technology and its assessment in eight countries. Washington, DC: United States Congress, 1995: 171-208.
17. Battista R, Jacob R, Hodge M. Health care technology in Canada (with special reference to Quebec). In: Banta D,Battista R,Gelband H,Jonsson E,eds. Health care technology and its assessment in eight countries. Washington, DC: United States Congress, 1995: 61-102.
18. Granados A, Sampriedo L, Asua J. Health technology assessment in Spain. Int J Technol Assess Health Care (in press.)
19. Weill C. Health care technology in France. In: Banta D,Battista R,Gelband H,Jonsson E,eds. Health care technology and its assessment in eight countries. Washington, DC: United States Congress, 1995: 103-135.
20. Swedish Council on Technology Assessment in Health Care. Publications from INAHTA agencies. Stockholm: SBU, May, 1999.
21. Woolf S. Health technology assessment in the United Kingdom. Int J Technol Assess Health Care (in press.)
22. This is INAHTA. Stockholm: Swedish Council on Technology Assessment in Health Care, 1998 www.inahta.org.
23. Brorsson B, Arvidsson S. The effect of dissemination of recommendations on use: preoperative routines in Sweden, 1989-91. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 1997; 13: 547-553.