Goals and methods of audit should be reappraised

BMJ

Volumn 313, Issue 7055, 1996, Pages 497-

  Miles, Andrew ^a   Bentley, Paul ^b   Polychronis, Andreas ^b   Price, Nicholas ^b   Grey, Joseph ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SURREY   (United Kingdom)

^b NONE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LETTER; MEDICAL AUDIT; NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE; UNITED KINGDOM; GENERAL PRACTICE; GOVERNMENT; METHODOLOGY; MOTIVATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGNOSIS;

GREAT BRITAIN; MEDICAL AUDIT; STATE MEDICINE;

EID: 85007745226     PISSN: 09598138     EISSN: 14685833     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.313.7055.497     Document Type: Letter

References (5)

1. Fulton RA. Goals and methods of audit should be reappraised. BMJ 1996; 312: 1103. (27 April.)
2. Miles A, Bentley DP, Polychronis A, Price N, Grey JE. Clinical audit in the National Health Service: fact or fiction? Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 1996; 2: 29–35.
3. Miles A, Bentley DP, Price N, Polychronis A, Grey JE, Asbridge JE. The total healthcare audit system: a systematic methodology for clinical practice evaluation and development in NHS provider organisations Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 1996; 2: 37–64.
4. Chambers R, Bowyers S, Campbell I. Investigation into the attitudes of general practitioners in Staffordshire to medical audit. Quality in Health Care 1996; 5: 13–19.
5. Sellu D. Time to audit audit. BMJ 1996; 312: 128–9. (13 January.)