Priority setting in health care

BMJ

Volumn 321, Issue 7266, 2000, Pages 954-

  Cookson, Richard ^a   Dolan, Paul ^b   Ford, Jon ^c   Cooke, Lorelei ^c   Torgerson, David ^d   Gosden, Toby ^e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EAST ANGLIA   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

^c BRITISH MEDICAL ASSOCIATION   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

^e UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85007703876     PISSN: 09598138     EISSN: 14685833     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.321.7266.954     Document Type: Letter

References (8)

1. Torgerson D, Gosden T. Priority setting in health care: should we ask the tax payer? BMJ 2000; 320: 1679. (17 June.)
2. Torgerson D, Gosden T. Priority setting in health care: should we ask the tax payer? BMJ 2000; 320: 1679. (17 June.)
3. Health Policy and Economic Research Unit. Review of UK healthcare funding. Research report 1—What sort of healthcare does the public expect, want or need? London: BMA, 2000.
4. National Consumer Council. Consumer concerns 1998—A consumer view of health services, the report of an RSL survey. London: National Consumer Council, 1998.
5. Dolan P, Cookson R, Ferguson B. Effect of discussion and deliberation on the public's views of priority setting in health care: focus group study. BMJ 1999; 318: 916–919.
6. Bowling A. Health care rationing: the public's debate. BMJ 1996; 312: 670–674.
7. Gøtzsche PC, Olsen O. Is screening for breast cancer with mammography justifiable? Lancet 2000; 355: 129–134.
8. Hardcastle JD, Chamberlain JO, Robinson MH, Moss SM, Amar SS, Balfour TW, et al. Randomised controlled trial of faecal-occult-blood screening for colorectal cancer. Lancet 1996; 348: 1472–1477.