Should GMC leaders be put to the sword?: No, doctors must work together

BMJ

Volumn 321, Issue 7253, 2000, Pages 61-

  Smith, Richard ^a  

^a BMJ ^*  (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPETENCE; EDITORIAL; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; MEDICAL PRACTICE; PHYSICIAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; DECISION MAKING; GREAT BRITAIN; INTERPROFESSIONAL RELATIONS; LEADERSHIP; PHYSICIANS; SOCIETIES, MEDICAL;

EID: 85007686028     PISSN: 09598138     EISSN: 14685833     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.321.7253.61     Document Type: Editorial

References (5)

1. Smith R. The GMC: where now? BMJ 2000; 320: 1356.
2. Beecham L. BMA's annual meeting expresses “no confidence” in GMC. BMJ 2000; 321: 69.
3. Battle G. All gloss and noise. BMJ 2000; 321: 122.
4. Du Boulay C. Revalidation for doctors in the United Kingdom: the end or the beginning? BMJ 2000; 320: 1490.
5. Buckley G. Revalidation is the answer. BMJ 1999; 319: 1145–1146.