Trade-off analysis of ecosystem service provision in nature networks

Ecosystem Services

Volumn 23, Issue , 2017, Pages 165-173

  Vogdrup Schmidt, Mathias ^a   Strange, Niels ^a   Thorsen, Bo Jellesmark ^a,a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

Author keywords

EU Biodiversity Strategy 2020; ILWIS; Mapping ecosystem services; Spatial multi criteria decision analysis

Indexed keywords

EID: 85007610621     PISSN: 22120416     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.12.011     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Bateman, I.J., Mace, G.M., Fezzi, C., Atkinson, G., Turner, R.K., Economic analysis for ecosystem service assessments. Environ. Resour. Econ. 48 (2011), 177–218.
2. Bennett, E.M., Peterson, G.D., Gordon, L.J., Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services. Ecol. Lett. 12:12 (2009), 1394–1404.
3. Bogetoft, P., Pruzan, P., Planning with Multiple Criteria: Investigation, Communication and Choice. 1997, Handelshøjskolens Forlag), Copenhagen Business School Press, Copenhagen.
4. Brunet, J., Fritz, Ö., Richnau, G., Biodiversity in European beech forests–a review with recommendations for sustainable forest management. Ecol. Bull. 53 (2010), 77–94.
5. Chen, Y., Yu, J., Khan, S., Spatial sensitivity analysis of multi-criteria weights in GIS-based land suitability evaluation. Environ. Model. Softw. 25:12 (2010), 1582–1591.
6. Danish Energy Agency, 2014. Socio-economic Method of analysis (In Danish). 1 edn. Copenhagen, Denmark.
7. Danish Geodata Agency, 2013. -last update, Klimatilpasningsplaner (In Danish) (Homepage of Miljøministeriet)(Online). Available: 〈http://download.kortforsyningen.dk/〉.
8. Dce, 2008. DCE (Nationalt Center for Miljø og Energi) 2013: Datakilder overført til Fødevareministeriet/NaturErhvervstyrelsens markkort. Opdatering af nitratklassifikationen i Danmark. 2. generation. Fagligt notat af 23. oktober, 2008. Danmarks Miljøundersøgelser, Aarhus Universitet. HNV: 〈http://www2.dmu.dk/Pub/SR40.pdf〉. jordbrugsanalyser.dk. GEUS's database (JUPITER, 2008). Jb-nummer for jordtype: Dept. of Agroecology - Aarhus University, den landsomfattende jordklassificering, tilgængelig på 〈http://djfgeodata.dk/datasaml/index.html〉. Aarhus, Denmark: Aarhus University. [In Danish].
9. Denmark's Environment Portal, 2014. -last update, Danmarks Miljøportal (In Danish). Available: 〈http://www.miljoeportal.dk/Sider/Forside.aspx〉.
10. Dubgaard, A., Laugesen, F.M., Ståhl, L., Bang, J.R., Schou, E., Jacobsen, B.H., Ørum, J.E., Jensen, J.D., Analyse af omkostningseffektiviteten ved drivhusgasreducerende tiltag i relation til landbruget (In Danish). 2013, Institut for Fødevare-og Ressourceøkonomi, Københavns Universitet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
11. Ejrnæs, R., Skov, F., Bladt, J., Fredshavn, J.R., Nygaard, B., 2012. Udvikling af en HighNature Value (HNV) indikator. Rangordning af arealer efter naturværdi og potentiale [In Danish]. 40. Aarhus Universitet, DCE – Nationalt Center for Miljø og Energi.
12. Esri, 2012. ArcMap 10.1. 〈http://www.esri.com/software/arcgis〉. ESRI, California, USA.
13. Friedel, A., Dengler, J., Härdtle, W., Species diversity and species composition of epiphytic bryophytes and lichens–a comparison of managed and unmanaged beech forests in NE Germany. Feddes Repert. 117:1‐2 (2006), 172–185.
14. Gregory, R., Failing, L., Harstone, M., Long, G., Mcdaniels, T., Ohlson, D., Structured decision making: a practical guide to environmental management choices. 2012, John Wiley & Sons.
15. Gregory, R., Long, G., Using structured decision making to help implement a precautionary approach to endangered species management. Risk Anal. 29:4 (2009), 518–532.
16. Kahneman, D., Thinking Fast and Slow. 2011, Farrar, Strauss, Giroux, New York.
17. Keeney, R.L., Value-focused thinking: identifying decision opportunities and creating alternatives. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 92:3 (1996), 537–549.
18. Lassauce, A., Paillet, Y., Jactel, H., Bouget, C., Deadwood as a surrogate for forest biodiversity: meta-analysis of correlations between deadwood volume and species richness of saproxylic organisms. Ecol. Indic. 11:5 (2011), 1027–1039.
19. Maes, J., Teller, A., Erhard, M., Liquete, C., Braat, L., Berry, P., Egoh, B., Puydarrieux, P., Fiorina, C., Santos, F., Mapping and Assessment of Ecosystems and Their Services – An Analytical Framework for Ecosystem Assessments under Action 5 of the EU Biodiversity Strategy to 2020. 2013.
20. Maes, J., Paracchini, M.L., Zulian, G., Dunbar, M.B., Alkemade, R., Synergies and trade-offs between ecosystem service supply, biodiversity, and habitat conservation status in Europe. Biol. Conserv. 155 (2012), 1–12.
21. Malczewski, J., GIS and Multicriteria Decision analysis. (392 pages), 1999, John Wiley & Sons.
22. Mcshane, T.O., Hirsch, P.D., Trung, T.C., Songorwa, A.N., Kinzig, A., Monteferri, B., Mutekanga, D., Van Thang, H., Dammert, J.L., Pulgar-Vidal, M., Hard choices: making trade-offs between biodiversity conservation and human well-being. Biol. Conserv. 144:3 (2011), 966–972.
23. Mendoza, G., Martins, H., Multi-criteria decision analysis in natural resource management: a critical review of methods and new modelling paradigms. For. Ecol. Manag. 230:1 (2006), 1–22.
24. Ministry of Environment, 2014. Naturplan Danmark (In Danish) 68 pages. Copenhagen.
25. Müller, J., Brunet, J., Brin, A., Bouget, C., Brustel, H., Bussler, H., Förster, B., Isacsson, G., Köhler, F., Lachat, T., Gossner, M.M., Implications from large-scale spatial diversity patterns of saproxylic beetles for the conservation of European beech forests. Insect Conserv. Divers. 6 (2013), 162–169.
26. Müller, J., Bütler, R., A review of habitat thresholds for dead wood: a baseline for management recommendations in European forests. Eur. J. For. Res. 129:6 (2010), 981–992.
27. Nac, Nature and Agriculture Commission - Natur og landbrug: en ny start (In Danish) 120 pages. 2013, Natur-og Landbrugskommissionen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
28. Ódor, P., Heilmann-Clausen, J., Christensen, M., Aude, E., Van Dort, K., Piltaver, A., Siller, I., Veerkamp, M., Walleyn, R., Standovár, T., Diversity of dead wood inhabiting fungi and bryophytes in semi-natural beech forests in Europe. Biol. Conserv. 131:1 (2006), 58–71.
29. Ravensbeck, L., Andersen, P., Thorsen, B.J., Strange, N., Økosystemtjenester og deres værdisætning i tilknytning til et landsdækkende grønt naturnetværk i Danmark: eksisterende viden, potentiel anvendelse og vidensbehov [In Danish]. 2013, Institut for Fødevare-og Ressourceøkonomi, Københavns Universitet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
30. Rodríguez, J.P., Beard, T.D., Bennett, E.M., Cumming, G.S., Cork, S.J., Agard, J., Dobson, A.P., Peterson, G.D., Trade-offs across space, time, and ecosystem services. Ecol. Soc., 11(1), 2006, 28.
31. Rouget, M., Cowling, R.M., Lombard, A.T., Knight, A.T., Kerley, G.I., Designing large‐scale conservation corridors for pattern and process. Conserv. Biol. 20:2 (2006), 549–561.
32. Sharifi, A., Rodriguez, E., Design and development of a planning support system for policy formulation in water resources rehabilitation: the case of Alcazar De San Juan district in aquifer 23, La Mancha, Spain. J. Hydroinformatics 4 (2002), 157–175.
33. Store, R., Kangas, J., Integrating spatial multi-criteria evaluation and expert knowledge for GIS-based habitat suitability modelling. Landsc. Urban Plan. 55:2 (2001), 79–93.
34. Sukhdev, P., Wittmer, H., Schröter-Schlaack, C., Nesshöver, C., Bishop, J., Ten Brink, P., Gundimeda, H., Kumar, P., Simmons, B., The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity: mainstreaming the economics of nature: a synthesis of the approach, conclusions and recommendations of TEEB. TEEB, 2010.
35. University of Twente, 2013. Integrated Land and Water Information System. 3.8.3 edn.The Netherlands.
36. Van Herwijnen, M., Spatial Decision Support for Environmental Management. 1999, Free University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
37. Videnscenter For Landbrug, 2013. -last update, Farmtal Online (In Danish). Available: 〈https://farmtalonline.dlbr.dk〉.
38. Watson, R., Albon, S., Aspinall, R., Austen, M., Bardgett, B., Bateman, I., Berry, P., Bird, W., Bradbury, R., Brown, C., UK National Ecosystem Assessment: understanding nature's value to society. Synthesis of key findings. UNEP-WCMC. 87 pages. 2011, Information Press, Cambridge, UK.
39. World Resources Institute, Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Ecosystem and Human Well-being. 2005, Island Press, Washington, DC, USA.