Border Control: Some Comparative Remarks on the Cartography of Obligations

Exploring Contract Law

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 25-49

  Dedek, Helge ^a  

^a MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85007586176     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (82)

1. D Arnold, The Age of Discovery, 2nd edn (London, Routledge, 2002) passim.
2. DJ Boorstin, The Discoverers (New York, Random House, 1983)
3. P Whitfield, New found lands: Maps in the History of Exploration (London, Routledge, 1998)
4. D Kehlmann, Measuring the World, trans CB Janeway (London, Quercus, 2007)
5. S Waddams, Dimensions of Private Law (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2003) 1ff
6. G Samuel, ‘Can the Common Law Be Mapped?’ (2005) 55 University of Toronto Law Journal 271.
7. AJ Rodenbeck, The Anatomy of the Law, A Logical Presentation of the Parts of the Body of the Law (Boston, Little, Brown & Co, 1925)
8. E Munguia Jr, (1925–26) 14 California Law Review 150–52.
9. JG Daugman, ‘Brain Metaphors and Brain Theory’ in W Bechtel et al (eds), Philosophy and the Neurosciences (Oxford, Blackwell, 2001) 23–5
10. TS Kuhn, ‘Metaphor in Science’ in A Ortony (ed), Metaphor and Thought (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1993) 409–19.
11. N Kasirer, ‘Bijuralism in Law’s Empire and in Law’s Cosmos’ (2002) 52 Journal of Legal Education 29, 32, 34 et passim
12. P Schlag, ‘The Aesthetics of American Law’ (2002) 115 Harvard Law Review 1047, 1055.
13. CC Langdell, A Selection of Cases on the Law of Contracts, 2nd edn (Boston, Little, Brown & Co, 1879) ix.
14. G Samuel, ‘English Private Law: Old and New Thinking in the Taxonomy Debate’ (2004) 24 OJLS 335.
15. P Birks (ed), English Private Law, 1st edn (Oxford, Oxford University Press) vol 1, xxxv.
16. D Kennedy, ‘Toward an Historical Understanding of Legal Consciousness: The Case of Classical Legal Thought in America, 1850–1940’ (1980) 3 Research in Law & Sociology 3.
17. N Duxbury, ‘English Jurisprudence between Austin and Hart’ (2005) 91 Virginia Law Review 1.
18. A Burrows (ed), English Private Law, 2nd edn (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2007) xxxi.
19. HLW Nelson, Überlieferung, Aufbau und Stil von Gai Institutiones (Leiden, Brill, 1981) passim.
20. P Birks, ‘Definition and Division, A Meditation on Institutes 3.13’ in P Birks (ed), The Classification of Obligations (Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1997) 1ff.
21. JH Merryman, The Civil Law Tradition, 2nd edn (Stanford, Stanford University Press, 1984) 90ff.
22. P Legrand, ‘European Legal Systems Are Not Converging’ (1996) 45 Intellectional and Commercial Law Quarterly 52, 60ff
23. P Legrand, ‘How to Compare Now?’ (1996) 16 Legal Studies 232, 237ff.
24. P Legrand, ‘Antivonbar’ (2006) 1 Journal of Comparative Law 13.
25. P Schlag, ‘Law and Phrenology’ (1997) 110 Harvard Law Review 877.
26. R Pound, ‘Classification of Law’ (1924) 37 Harvard Law Review 933–69.
27. R Ellen, ‘Introduction: Categories, Classification and Cognitive Anthropology’ in R Ellen (ed), The Categorical Impulse, Essays in the Anthropology of Classifying Behaviour (New York, Berghahn, 2006) 1.
28. M Foucault, The Order of Things (New York, Random House, 1973) xv.
29. CB Mervis and E Rosch, ‘Categorisation of Natural Objects’ (1981) 32 Annual Review of Psychology 89, 91ff.
30. JB Harley, ‘Deconstructing the Map’ (1989) 26 Cartographica 1–20.
31. JM Feinman, ‘The Jurisprudence of Classification’ (1989) 41 Stanford Law Review 661, 699.
32. D Campbell, ‘Classification and the Crisis of the Common Law,’ book review of The Classification of Obligations by P Birks (1999) 26 Journal of Law & Society 369
33. W Blackstone, Commentaries on the Laws of England, facsimile of 1st edn 1765–1769 (Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1979) vol 1, 36.
34. JP Dawson, ‘Restitution or Damages’ (1959) 20 Ohio State Law Journal 175, 187.
35. J Bentham, ‘Papers Relative to Codification and Public Instruction: Including Correspondence with the Russian Emperor, and Divers Constituted Authorities in the American United States’ in P Schofield and J Harris (eds), ‘Legislator of the World’: Writings on Codification, Law, and Education (Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1998) 8.
36. A Kocourek, ‘Classification of Law’ (1934) 11 New York University Law Quarterly Review 319, 327
37. K Luig, ‘The Institutes of National Law in the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries’ (1972) 17 Juridical Review (NS) 193, 195
38. C Behan McCullagh, ‘Colligation and Classification in History’ (1978) 17 History and Theory 267ff.
39. K Zweigert and H Kötz, An Introduction to Comparative Law, 3rd edn, trans T Weir (Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1998) 145.
40. R Berkowitz, The Gift of Science (Cambridge, Harvard University Press, 2005) 17ff.
41. JS Freedman, ‘The Diffusion of the Writings of Petrus Ramus in Central Europe, c 1570–c 1630’ (1993) 46 Renaissance Quarterly 98ff.
42. DR Kelley, ‘Jurisconsultus Perfectus: The Lawyer as Renaissance Man’ (1988) 51 Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 84, 91ff.
43. G Otte, Dialektik und Jurisprudenz, Untersuchungen zur Methode der Glossatoren (Frankfurt am Main, Vittorio Klostermann, 1971) passim.
44. F Wieacker, Privatrechtsgeschichte der Neuzeit, 2nd edn (Göttingen, Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1967) 430.
45. OG Chase, ‘Legal Processes and National Culture’ (1997) 5 Cardozo Journal of International & Comparative Law 1
46. JH Langbein’s angry reply ‘Cultural Chauvinism in Comparative Law’ (1997) 5 Cardozo Journal of International & Comparative Law 41
47. N Kasirer, ‘Larger than Life’ (1995) 10 Canadian Journal of Law and Society 185.
48. BS Markesinis, The German Law of Contract, 2nd edn (Oxford, Hart Publishing, 2006) 16ff.
49. R Zimmermann, The Law of Obligations (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1996) 29ff.
50. F Pollock, Essays in Jurisprudence and Ethics (London, Macmillan, 1882) 14
51. G Boehmer, Grundlagen der Bürgerlichen Rechtsordnung, (Tübingen, JCB Mohr (Paul Siebeck), 1951) vol 2, pt 1, 72.
52. AB Schwarz, ‘Zur Entstehung des modernen Pandektensystems’ (1921) 42 Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte Romanistische Abteilung 578.
53. M Avenarius, ‘Der Allgemeine Teil des Obligationenrechts aus Savignys Pandektenmanuskript- Bedeutung und Grundsatze der Edition’ in M Avenarius (ed), Friedrich Carl v Savigny, Pandekten, Obligationenrecht, Allgemeiner Teil, (Frankfurt am Main, Vittorio Klostermann, 2008) 12ff.
54. JF Stagl, ‘Die Rezeption der Lehre vom Rechtsgeschäft in Österreich durch Joseph Unger’ [2007] Zeitschrift für Europäisches Privatrecht 37, 39.
55. J Gordley, The Philosophical Origins of Modern Contract Doctrine (Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1991) 227.
56. D Kennedy, ‘Two Globalizations of Law & Legal Thought, 1850–1968’ (2003) 36 Suffolk University Law Review 631, 637.
57. H Dedek, Negative Haftung aus Vertrag (Tübingen, JCB Mohr (Paul Siebeck), 2007) 101.
58. W Flume, ‘Vom Beruf unserer Zeit für Gesetzgebung’ [2000] Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht 1427.
59. P-G Jobin, Les Obligations, 6th edn (Cowansville, Yvon Blais, 2005) 267ff.
60. R Zimmermann, The New German Law of Obligations (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2005).
61. O Lenel, Das Edictum perpetuum: Ein Versuch zu seiner Wiederherstellung, 3rd edn (Leipzig, Tauchnitz, 1927) 554ff
62. É Jakab, Praedicere und cavere beim Marktkauf—Sachmängel im griechischen und römischen Recht (München, CH Beck, 1997) 123ff, 153ff, 272, 291ff, 296.
63. B Dauner-Lieb, ‘Die geplante Schuldrechtsmodernisierung’ [2001] Juristenzeitung 8, 12ff, 16
64. H Dedek, ‘Vorbemerkung zu §§ 241ff’ in M Henssler and F Graf v Westphalen (eds), Praxis der Schuldrechtsreform, 2nd edn (Recklinghausen, ZAP-Verlag, 2002), passim.
65. PS Atiyah, Essays on Contract (Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1986) 73.
66. G Gilmore, The Death of Contract (Columbus, Ohio State University Press, 1974) 56.
67. TD Rakoff, ‘Fuller and Perdue’s The Reliance Interest as a Work of Legal Scholarship’ [1991] Wisconsin Law Review 203, 206ff
68. PS Atiyah, Promises, Morals, and Law (Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1981) 36ff
69. SA Smith, Contract Theory (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2004) 413ff
70. SA Smith, ‘“The Reliance Interest in Contract Damages” and the Morality of Contract Law’, Issues in Legal Scholarship, Symposium: Fuller and Perdue (2001): Article 1, (last accessed November 2008).
71. H Altmeppen, ‘Untaugliche Regeln zum Vertrauensschaden und Erfüllungsinteresse im Schuldrechtsmodernisierungsentwurf’ [2001] Der Betrieb 1399, 1403ff
72. H Altmeppen, ‘Nochmals: Schadensersatz wegen Pflichtverletzung, anfängliche Unmöglichkeit und Aufwendungsersatz im Entwurf des Schuldrechtsmodernisierungsgesetzes’ [2001] Der Betrieb 1821, 1823.
73. MB Kelly, ‘The Phantom Reliance Interest in Contract Damages’ [1992] Wisconsin Law Review 1755, 1775, n 60.
74. H McGregor, McGregor on Damages, 17th edn (London, Sweet & Maxwell, 2003) [2–020].
75. EA Farnsworth, Contracts, 3rd edn (New York, Aspen Publishers, 1999)
76. JD McCamus, The Law of Contracts (Toronto, Irwin Law, 2005) 835.
77. Iacobus Cuiacius, Opera Omnia In Decem Tomos Distributa, Opera Postumae Quae De Iure Reliquit, Tomus Quartus, Pars Prior, Paris, 1658
78. G Ripert, Traité de droit civil: d’après le traité de Planiol (Paris, Librairie générale de droit de jurisprudence, 1956) vol 2, 247.
79. GH Treitel, Remedies for Breach of Contract (Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1988) 89.
80. E Hondius, ‘The Two Faces of the Catala Project—Towards a New General Part of the French Law of Obligations’ (2007) 15 European Review of Private Law 835–9.
81. P Birks, ‘Equity in the Modern Law: An Exercise in Taxonomy’ (1996) 26 University of Western Australia Law Review 1, 5.
82. A Korzybski, Science and Sanity: An Introduction to Non-Aristotelian Systems and General Semantics, 3rd edn (Lakeville, Connecticut, The International Non-Aristotelian Library, 1948) 58 (emphasis added).