Erratum: Factors Affecting the Selling Price of Feeder Cattle Sold at Arkansas Livestock Auctions. (Professional Animal Scientist (2002) 18(3) (227–236)(S1080744615315266)(10.15232/S1080-7446(15)31526-6));Factors Affecting the Selling Price of Feeder Cattle Sold at Arkansas Livestock Auctions1 This material is based on work supported by the Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture and the Cooperative Extension Service, University of Arkansas under special project number 97-EXCA-2-0513. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the view of the U.S. Department of Agriculture.

Professional Animal Scientist

Volumn 18, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 227-236

  Troxel, T R ^a   Gadberry, M S ^b   Cline, S ^b   Foley, J ^b   Ford, G ^b   Urell, D ^b   Wiedower, R ^b  

^a University of Arkansas Cooperative Extension Service ^*

^b University of Arkansas Fayetteville   (United States)

Author keywords

Beef Cattle; Feeder Cattle; Livestock Auction; Selling Price

Indexed keywords

EID: 85007552677     PISSN: 10807446     EISSN: 1525318X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.15232/S1080-7446(15)31380-2     Document Type: Erratum

References (13)

1. 1. Adams, T.E., Adams, B.M., Feedlot performance of steers and bulls actively immunized against gonadotropin-releasing hormone. J. Anim. Sci, 70, 1986, 1691.
2. 2. Brazle, F., Kuhl, G., Effect of castration, dehorning, frame size and gut fill on the long-term performance of stockers purchased as steers or bulls. Cattlemen's Day 1992, 1992, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS Dep. Anim. Sci.,.
3. 3. Brown, D.T., Morgan, E.W., Value differentials between breeds and breed crosses of steers in Georgia auctions. J. Anim. Sci, 76(2), 1998, 7 (Suppl.).
4. 4. Castro, V.M., Veserat, G.M., Oltjen, J.W., Buyer survey to determine desired production practices for a value-added program for beef cattle in California. J. Anim. Sci, 76(1), 1998, 105 (Suppl.): (Abst.).
5. 5. Cheney, S., Troxel, T., Livestock market news roundup 1980-2000. Arkansas Livest, 2001, Grain Market News Surv., University of Arkansas Coop. Ext. Serv., Little Rock, AR.
6. 6. McLemore, D.L., Rawls, E.L., Wells, D.E., Factors affecting price differences for feeder cattle sold through Tennessee auctions, 18, 1993, University of Tennessee Exp. Stn. Res. Rep. 93.
7. 7. NAHMS. Reference of 1997 Beef Cow-Calf Management Practices, 1, 1997, National Animal Health Monitoring System, Fort Collins, CO, 25.
8. 8. Neel, J.B., Gill, W.W., Harrison, K., Rating of economic importance of feeder cattle traits. J. Anim. Sci, 7(2), 1998, 7 (Suppl.).
9. 9. SAS. SAS Procedures Guide, (Version 3 Ed.), 1992, SAS Inst. Inc., Cary, NC.
10. 10. Smith, S.C., Gill, D.R., Bess, C., Effect of selected characteristics on the sale price of feeder cattle in Eastern Oklahoma (1997 and 1999). Oklahoma Coop. Ext. Serv., Division of Agric. Sci. Nat. Res, 1999, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK.
11. 11. USDA. U.S. standards for grades of feeder cattle, 1980, USDA, Washington, DC Agric. Marketing Serv. Apr. 1980. AMS-586.
12. 12. USDA. 1997 census of agriculture, 1, 1999, USDA, Washington, DC, 337 U. S. Summary and State Data. Natl. Agric. Statistics Serv. AC978-A-51. Part 51.
13. 13. USDA. U.S. standards for grades of feeder cattle, 2000, USDA, Washington, DC Agric. Marketing Serv. Oct. 2000. AMS-586.