Using the Nine Common Themes of Good Practice checklist as a tool for evaluating the research priority setting process of a provincial research and program evaluation program

Health Research Policy and Systems

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2016, Pages

  Mador, Rebecca L ^a   Kornas, Kathy ^a   Simard, Anne ^a   Haroun, Vinita ^b  

^a PUBLIC HEALTH ONTARIO   (Canada)

^b Health Quality Ontario   (Canada)

Author keywords

Evaluation; Priority setting; Public health; Research priorities

Indexed keywords

ADVISORY COMMITTEE; CHECKLIST; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; CONSULTATION; EXERCISE; HUMAN; ONTARIO; PROGRAM EVALUATION; PUBLIC HEALTH; RESEARCH PRIORITY; COOPERATION; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; METHODOLOGY; PROCEDURES; PUBLIC SECTOR;

BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; CHECKLIST; COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; HUMANS; ONTARIO; PROGRAM EVALUATION; PUBLIC SECTOR; RESEARCH DESIGN;

EID: 85007508030     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14784505     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s12961-016-0092-5     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Fleurence RL, Torgerson DJ. Setting priorities for research. Health Policy. 2004;69:1-10.
2. Sibbald SL, Singer PA, Upshur R, Martin DK. Priority setting: what constitutes success? A conceptual framework for successful priority setting. BMC Health Serv Res. 2009;9:43.
3. Campbell S. Deliberative priority setting-a CIHR KT module. Ottawa, ON: Canadian Institutes of Health Research; 2010. http://www.cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/documents/deliberative_priority_setting_module_e.pdf. Accessed 21 Oct 2015.
4. Ghaffar A, Collins T, Matlin SA, Olifson S. The 3D combined approach matrix: an improved tool for setting priorities in research for health. Geneva: Global Forum for Health Research; 2009.
5. Gooberman-Hill R, Horwood J, Calnan M. Citizens' juries in planning research priorities: process, engagement and outcome. Health Expect. 2008;11:272-81.
6. Lomas J, Fulop N, Gagnon D, Allen P. On being a good listener: setting priorities for applied health services research. Milbank Q. 2003;81:363-88.
7. Peacock S, Mitton C, Bate A, McCoy B, Donaldson C. Overcoming barriers to priority setting using interdisciplinary methods. Health Policy. 2009;92:124-32.
8. Tomlinson M, Chopra M, Sanders D, Bradshaw D, Hendricks M, Greenfield D, et al. Setting priorities in child health research investments for South Africa. PLoS Med. 2007;4:e259.
9. Reveiz L, Elias V, Terry RF, Alger J, Becerra-Posada F. Comparison of national health research priority-setting methods and characteristics in Latin America and the Caribbean, 2002-2012. Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2013;34:1-13.
10. McGregor S, Henderson KJ, Kaldor JM. How are health research priorities set in low and middle income countries? A systematic review of published reports. PLoS One. 2014;9:e108787.
11. Viergever RF, Olifson S, Ghaffar A, Terry RF. A checklist for health research priority setting: nine common themes of good practice. Health Res Policy Syst. 2010;8:36.
12. Bryant J, Sanson-Fisher R, Walsh J, Stewart J. Health research priority setting in selected high income countries: a narrative review of methods used and recommendations for future practice. Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2014;12:23.
13. Viergever RF. Medical research: analyse impact of health priorities. Nature. 2013;502:171.
14. Ontario Agency for Health Protection and Promotion (Public Health Ontario). Locally Driven Collaborative Projects: participation guidelines. Toronto, ON: Queen's Printer for Ontario; 2015. http://www. publichealthontario.ca/en/eRepository/LDCP_Participation_Guidelines_ 2015.pdf. Accessed 21 Oct 2015.
15. Ontario Agency for Health Protection and Promotion (Public Health Ontario). About Locally Driven Collaborative Projects. http://www. publichealthontario.ca/en/ServicesAndTools/ResearchAndEducationSupport/Pages/Locally-Driven-Collaborative-Projects.aspx. Accessed 21 Oct 2015.
16. Ontario. Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care. Ontario Public Health Standards 2008. Revised May 1, 2014. Toronto, ON: Queen's Printer for Ontario; 2014. http://www.health.gov.on.ca/en/pro/programs/publichealth/oph_standards/docs/ophs_2008.pdf. Accessed 21 Oct 2014.
17. Whear R, Thompson-Coon J, Boddy K, Papworth H, Frier J, Stein K. Establishing local priorities for a health research agenda. Health Expect. 2015;18:8-21.
18. Angulo A, Freij L, De Haan S, DelosRios R, Ghaffar A, IJsselmuiden C, et al. COHRED Working Paper 1. Priority setting for health research: toward a management process for low and middle income countries. Geneva: Council of Health Research for Development; 2006. http://www.cohred.org/downloads/cohred_publications/WP1_PrioritySetting.pdf. Accessed 21 Oct 2015.
19. Okello D, Chongtrakul P. COHRED Working Group on Priority Setting. A manual for research priority setting using the ENHR strategy. Geneva: Council of Health Research for Development; 2000. http://www.cohred.org/downloads/578.pdf. Accessed 21 Oct 2015.
20. Rudan I, El Arifeen S, Black RE. A systematic methodology for setting priorities in child health research investments. In: Huda TM, editor. A new approach for systematic priority setting. Dhaka: Child Health and Nutrition Research Initiative; 2006.
21. Ontario Agency for Health Protection and Promotion (Public Health Ontario), Mador RL, Haroun V. 2012 LDCP workshop 1: moving from possibilities to projects. Workshop 1 report. Toronto, ON: Queen's Printer for Ontario; 2012. http://www.publichealthontario.ca/en/eRepository/Workshop_1_Report_Possibilities_2012.pdf. Accessed 21 Oct 2015.
22. Lenaway D, Halverson P, Sotnikov S, Tilson H, Corso L, Millington W. Public health systems research: setting a national agenda. Am J Public Health. 2006;96:410-3.
23. Smith N, Mitton C, Peacock S, Cornelissen E, MacLeod S. Identifying research priorities for health care priority setting: a collaborative effort between managers and researchers. BMC Health Serv Res. 2009;9:165.
24. Hsu C, Sandford BA. The Delphi technique: making sense of consensus. Pract Assess Res Eval. 2007;12:1-8.
25. Tomlinson M, Chopra M, Hoosain N, Rudan I. A review of selected research priority setting processes at national level in low and middle income countries: towards fair and legitimate priority setting. Health Res Policy Syst. 2011;9:19.