Changes in the worldwide epidemiology of peritoneal dialysis

Nature Reviews Nephrology

Volumn 13, Issue 2, 2017, Pages 90-103

  Li, Philip Kam Tao ^a   Chow, Kai Ming ^a   Van De Luijtgaarden, Moniek W M ^b   Johnson, David W ^c   Jager, Kitty J ^b   Mehrotra, Rajnish ^d   Naicker, Sarala ^e   Pecoits Filho, Roberto ^f   Yu, Xue Qing ^g   Lameire, Norbert ^h  

^a CHINESE UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^c UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

^d UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF THE WITWATERSRAND   (South Africa)

^f PONTIFICAL CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF PARANÁ   (Brazil)

^g SUN YAT SEN UNIVERSITY   (China)

^h GHENT UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PERITONEAL DIALYSIS FLUID;

AFRICA; AGING; CANADA; CHINA; CHRONIC KIDNEY FAILURE; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; DIABETES MELLITUS; EUROPE; GLOBAL DISEASE BURDEN; HEALTH CARE DISPARITY; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH CARE UTILIZATION; HEMODIALYSIS; HUMAN; INCIDENCE; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; JAPAN; KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION; MEDICAL EDUCATION; NEPHROLOGIST; PACIFIC ISLANDS; PERITONEAL DIALYSIS; PREVALENCE; REVIEW; SOUTH AND CENTRAL AMERICA; THAILAND; TREATMENT OUTCOME; TREND STUDY; UNITED STATES; ECONOMICS; GLOBAL HEALTH; KIDNEY FAILURE, CHRONIC; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; TRENDS; UTILIZATION;

GLOBAL HEALTH; HUMANS; KIDNEY FAILURE, CHRONIC; PERITONEAL DIALYSIS;

EID: 85007463595     PISSN: 17595061     EISSN: 1759507X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nrneph.2016.181     Document Type: Review

References (102)

1. Popovich, R. P. et al. Continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Ann. Intern. Med. 88, 449-456 (1978).
2. Oreopoulos, D. G., Robson, M., Izatt, S., Clayton, S. & deVeber, G. A. A simple and safe technique for continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD). Trans. Am. Soc. Artif. Intern. Organs 24, 484-489 (1978).
3. Li, P. K. & Chow, K. M. Peritoneal dialysis-first policy made successful: perspectives and actions. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 62, 993-1005 (2013).
4. Dhanakijcharoen, P., Sirivongs, D., Aruyapitipan, S., Chuengsaman, P. & Lumpaopong, A. The "PD First" policy in Thailand: Three-years experiences J. Med. Assoc. Thai 94 (Suppl. 4), S153-161 (2011).
5. Rivara, M. B. & Mehrotra, R. The changing landscape of home dialysis in the United States. Curr. Opin. Nephrol. Hypertens. 23, 586-591 (2014).
6. Fresenius Medical Care. Fresenius Medical Care 2015 Annual Report: ESRD patients in 2015: A global perspective (FMC 2015).
7. Liyanage, T. et al. Worldwide access to treatment for end-stage kidney disease: A systematic review. Lancet 385, 1975-1982 (2015).
8. Blake, P. G. Peritoneal dialysis in Asia: An external perspective. Perit. Dial. Int. 22, 258-264 (2002).
9. National Institute of Health. US Renal Data System 2015 Annual Data Report. Epidemiology of Kidney Disease in the United States. Chapter 13: International comparisons. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 67 (Suppl. 1), S291-334 (2016).
10. Leung, C. B., Cheung, W. L. & Li, P. K. Renal registry in Hong Kong-The first 20 years. Kidney Int. Suppl. 5, 33-38 (2015).
11. Jain, A. K., Blake, P., Cordy, P. & Garg, A. X. Global Trends in Rates of Peritoneal Dialysis. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 23, 533-544 (2012).
12. Yu, X. & Yang, X. Peritoneal dialysis in China: meeting the challenge of chronic kidney failure. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 65, 147-151 (2015).
13. Ministry of Health, P. R. China. Chinese National Renal Data System [online], http://www.cnrds.net (2016).
14. Lo, W. K. Peritoneal dialysis in the far East-An astonishing situation in 2008. Perit. Dial. Int. 29 (Suppl. 2), S227-229 (2009).
15. Van Bui, P. How peritoneal dialysis has developed in Vietnam. Perit. Dial. Int. 28 (Suppl. 3), S63-66 (2008).
16. Naramura, T. et al. Dialysis and quality of dialysate in southeast Asian developing countries. Nephron Extra 4, 64-69 (2014).
17. Jha, V. Current status of end-stage renal disease care in South Asia. Ethn Dis. 19, S1-27-32 (2009).
18. Navva, P. K., Venkata Sreepada, S. & Nayak, K. S. Present status of renal replacement therapy in Asian countries. Blood Purif. 40, 280-287 (2015).
19. Liu, F. X. et al. A global overview of the impact of peritoneal dialysis first or favored policies: An opinion. Perit. Dial. Int. 35, 406-420 (2015).
20. Choi, J. Y. et al. Survival advantage of peritoneal dialysis relative to hemodialysis in the early period of incident dialysis patients: A nationwide prospective propensity-matched study in Korea. PLoS ONE 8, e84257 (2013).
21. Li, P. K. & Szeto, C. C. Success of the peritoneal dialysis programme in Hong Kong. Nephrol. Dial Transplant 23, 1475-1478 (2008).
22. Kawaguchi, Y. National comparisons: optimal peritoneal dialysis outcomes among Japanese patients. Perit. Dial. Int. 19 (Suppl. 3), S9-16 (1999).
23. Ho, Y. W. et al. Hong Kong Renal Registry Report 2012. Hong Kong J. Nephrol. 15, 28-43 (2013).
24. Yu, X., Yang, X. & Huang, N. Management of a rapidly growing peritoneal dialysis population at the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University. Perit Dial Int. 34 (Suppl. 2), S31-34 (2014).
25. Jose, M. D. et al. Peritoneal dialysis practice in Australia and New Zealand: A call to action. Nephrology 16, 19-29 (2011).
26. Yang, X., Mao, H. P., Guo, Q. Y. & Yu, X. Q. Successfully managing a rapidly growing peritoneal dialysis program in Southern China. Chin. Med. J. (Engl.) 124, 2696-2700 (2011).
27. Joshi, U. et al. Clinical outcomes in elderly patients on chronic peritoneal dialysis: A retrospective study from a single center in china. Perit. Dial. Int. 34, 299-307 (2014).
28. Yang, X. et al. Clinical outcome and risk factors for mortality in Chinese patients with diabetes on peritoneal dialysis: A 5-year clinical cohort study. Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract. 100, 354-361 (2013).
29. Li, P. K. et al. Increasing home-based dialysis therapies to tackle dialysis burden around the world: A position statement on dialysis economics from the 2nd Congress of the International Society for Hemodialysis. Nephrology 16, 53-56 (2011).
30. Li, P. K. & Chow, K. M. Peritoneal dialysis patient selection: characteristics for success. Adv. Chron. Kidney Dis. 16, 160-168 (2009).
31. Morad, Z. & Choong, H. L., Tungsanga, K. & Suhardjono. Funding renal replacement therapy in southeast Asia: building public-private partnerships in Singapore, Malaysia, Thailand, and Indonesia. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 65, 799-805 (2015).
32. Utas, C. The development of PD in Turkey. Perit. Dial. Int. 28, 217-219 (2008).
33. Wen, J. Report on the work of the government. wsj. com [online], http://online.wsj.com/public/resources/documents/2012NPC-GovtWorkReport-English.pdf (2012).
34. Chen, Z. Good news for end stage renal disease patients. Chin. Med. J. (Engl.) 126, 4203 (2013).
35. Zhang, Z. & Zhao, K. The report of dialysis assessment and payment for end-stage renal disease in China. (National Health Development Research Center, 2011).
36. Ivarsen, P. & Povlsen, J. V. Can peritoneal dialysis be applied for unplanned initiation of chronic dialysis? Nephrol. Dial Transplant 29, 2201-2206 (2014).
37. Kumar, V. et al. Peritoneal dialysis: The great savior during disasters. Perit. Dial. Int. 33, 327-329 (2013).
38. Johnson, D. W. et al. Renal services disaster planning: Lessons learnt from the 2011 Queensland floods and North Queensland cyclone experiences. Nephrology 18, 41-46 (2013).
39. United Nations Population Division. World population prospects, the 2010 revision [online], http://www.un. org/en/development/desa/publications/world-population-prospects-The-2010-revision.html (2011).
40. National Institue of Health. US Renal Data System 2014 Annual Data Report. Epidemiol. Kidney Dis. United States. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 66 (Suppl. 1), S1-306 (2015).
41. Li, P. K. et al. Good patient and technique survival in elderly patients on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Perit. Dial. Int. 27 (Suppl. 2), S196-201 (2007).
42. Abraham, G. et al. Chronic peritoneal dialysis in South Asia-challenges and future. Perit. Dial. Int. 28, 13-19 (2008).
43. Xu, R. et al. Impact of individual and environmental socioeconomic status on peritoneal dialysis outcomes: A retrospective multicenter cohort study. PLoS ONE 7, e50766 (2012).
44. Johnson, D. W. et al. Biocompatible versus standard peritoneal dialysis fluid-The balANZ trial. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 23, 1097-1107 (2012).
45. The Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry. The 38th Annual ANZDATA Report [online]. http://www.anz data.org.au (2015).
46. Cho, Y. & Johnson, D. W. Peritoneal dialysis-related peritonitis: Towards improving evidence, practices, and outcomes. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 64, 278-289 (2014).
47. Johnson, D. W. et al. Encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis: incidence, predictors, and outcomes. Kidney Int. 77, 904-912 (2010).
48. Lim, W. H. et al. Remote indigenous peritoneal dialysis patients have higher risk of peritonitis, technique failure, all-cause and peritonitis-related mortality. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 26, 3366-3372 (2011).
49. Cho, Y. et al. The effects of living distantly from peritoneal dialysis units on peritonitis risk, microbiology, treatment and outcomes: A multi-centre registry study. BMC Nephrol. 13, 41 (2012).
50. Lim, W. H., Johnson, D. W. & McDonald, S. P. Higher rate and earlier peritonitis in Aboriginal patients compared to non-Aboriginal patients with end-stage renal failure maintained on peritoneal dialysis in Australia: Analysis of ANZDATA. Nephrology 10, 192-197 (2005).
51. Badve, S. V., Hawley, C. M. & Johnson, D. W. Adherence to guideline recommendations for infection prophylaxis in peritoneal dialysis patients. Nephrol. Dial Transplant. Plus 2, 508-508 (2009).
52. Ghali, J. R. et al. Microbiology and outcomes of peritonitis in Australian peritoneal dialysis patients. Perit. Dial. Int. 31, 651-662 (2011).
53. Morrish, A. T. et al. Establishing a clinical trials network in nephrology: experience of the Australasian Kidney Trials Network. Kidney Int. 85, 23-30 (2014).
54. Johnson, D., Brown, F., Lammi, H. & Walker, R. The CARI guidelines. Dialysis adequacy (PD) guidelines. Nephrology 10 (Suppl. 4), S81-107 (2005).
55. Walker, A. et al. KHA-CARI Guideline: peritonitis treatment and prophylaxis. Nephrology 19, 69-71 (2014).
56. Campbell, D. J. et al. Assessment of current practice and barriers to antimicrobial prophylaxis in peritoneal dialysis patients. Nephrol. Dial Transplant. 31, 619-627 (2016).
57. Toussaint, N. D. et al. Introduction of renal key performance indicators associated with increased uptake of peritoneal dialysis in a publicly funded health service. Perit. Dial. Int. http://dx.doi. org/10.3747/pdi.2016.00149 (2016).
58. Mudge, D. W. et al. Peritoneal dialysis practice in Australia and New Zealand: A call t sustain the action. Nephrology (Carlton) 21, 535-546 (2016).
59. ERA-EDTA Registry. ERA-EDTA Registry [online], https://www.era-edta-reg.org (2016).
60. van de Luijtgaarden, M. W. et al. Trends in dialysis modality choice and related patient survival in the ERA-EDTA Registry over a 20-year period. Nephrol. Dial Transplant. 31, 120-128 (2016).
61. Pippias, M. et al. The changing trends and outcomes in renal replacement therapy: data from the ERA-EDTA Registry. Nephrol. Dial Transplant 31, 831-841 (2016).
62. Machowska, A. & Rutherford, P. Peritoneal dialysis use within the context of the population and healthcare systems of Europe-differences, trends and future challenges. Int. J. Artif. Orgns 39, 211-219 (2016).
63. Desmet, J. M. et al. Perceptive barriers to peritoneal dialysis implementation: An opinion poll among the French-speaking Belgian nephrologists. Clin. Kidney J. 6, 358-362 (2013).
64. Van Biesen, W., Veys, N., Lameire, N. & Vanholder, R. Why less success of the peritoneal dialysis programmes in Europe? Nephrol. Dial Transplant 23, 1478-1481 (2008).
65. Lameire, N. & Van Biesen, W. Epidemiology of peritoneal dialysis: A story of believers and nonbelievers. Nat. Rev. Nephrol. 6, 75-82 (2010).
66. Van Biesen, W., van der Veer, S. N., Murphey, M., Loblova, O. & Davies, S. Patients' perceptions of information and education for renal replacement therapy: An independent survey by the European Kidney Patients' Federation on information and support on renal replacement therapy. PLoS ONE 9, e103914 (2014).
67. Vanholder, R., Lameire, N., Annemans, L. & Van Biesen, W. Cost of renal replacement: how to help as many as possible while keeping expenses reasonable? Nephrol. Dial Transplant 31, 1251-1261 (2016).
68. Foster, T. L., Ferrantelli, E., van Wier-van der Schaaf, T. & Beelen, R. H. European Training and Research in Peritoneal Dialysis: scientific objectives, training, implementation and impact of the programme. J. Ren Care 40, 34-39 (2014).
69. Machowsk, A. et al. European Training and Research in Peritoneal Dialysis-A network to deliver scientific peritoneal dialysis training to a new generation of researchers. Adv. Perit. Dial. 31, 26-29 (2015).
70. Wang, V. et al. Geographic and temporal trends in peritoneal dialysis services in the United States between 1995 and 2003. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 55, 1079-1087 (2010).
71. Mehrotra, R. et al. Chronic peritoneal dialysis in the United States: declining utilization despite improving outcomes. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 18, 2781-2788 (2007).
72. Mehrotra, R. et al. Ownership patterns of dialysis units and peritoneal dialysis in the United States: utilization and outcomes. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 54, 289-298 (2009).
73. Sedor, J. R. et al. ASN End-Stage Renal Disease Task Force: perspective on prospective payments for renal dialysis facilities. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 21, 1235-1237 (2010).
74. Mehrotra, R., Chiu, Y. W., Kalantar-Zadeh, K., Bargman, J. & Vonesh, E. Similar outcomes with hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis in patients with end-stage renal disease. Arch. Intern. Med. 171, 110-118 (2011).
75. Weinhandl, E. D. et al. Propensity-matched mortality comparison of incident hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis patients. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 21, 499-506 (2010).
76. Lacson, E. Jr et al. Effects of a nationwide predialysis educational program on modality choice, vascular access, and patient outcomes. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 58, 235-242 (2011).
77. Ghaffari, A. Urgent-start peritoneal dialysis: A quality improvement report. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 59, 400-408 (2012).
78. Mehrotra, R. Long-Term outcomes in automated peritoneal dialysis: similar or better than in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis? Perit. Dial. Int. 29 (Suppl. 2), S111-S114 (2009).
79. Mehrotra, R., Chiu, Y. W., Kalantar-Zadeh, K. & Vonesh, E. The outcomes of continuous ambulatory and automated peritoneal dialysis are similar. Kidney Int. 76, 97-107 (2009).
80. Jensen, V. & Throckmorton, D. C. Shortage of peritoneal dialysis solution and the Food and Drug Administration's Response. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 10, 1484-1486 (2015).
81. Canadian Organ Replacement Register. Canadian Organ Replacement Register Annual Report: Treatment of End-Stage Organ Failure in Canada, 2004 to 2013 [online], https://secure.cihi.ca/free-products/2015-CORR-AnnualReport-ENweb.pdf (2015).
82. Jindal, K. Revitalizing peritoneal dialysis: The Ontario approach. Perit Int. Dial 27, 526-528 (2007).
83. Perl, J. et al. Changes in patient and technique survival over time among incident peritoneal dialysis patients in Canada. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 7, 1145-1154 (2012).
84. Wong, L. P. et al. Urgent peritoneal dialysis starts for ESRD: initial multicenter experience in the United States. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 68, 500-502 (2016).
85. Afolalau, B. et al. Technique failure and center size in a large cohort of peritoneal dialysis patients in a defined geographic area. Perit. Dial. Int. 29, 292-296 (2009).
86. Plantinga, C. L. et al. Association of peritoneal dialysis clinic size with clinical outcomes. Perit. Dial. Int. 29, 285-291 (2009).
87. Gonzalez-Bedat, M. et al. Burden of disease: prevalence and incidence of ESRD in Latin America. Clin. Nephrol. 83, 3-6 (2015).
88. Pecoits-Filho, R. et al. Policies and health care financing issues for dialysis in Latin America: extracts from the roundtable discussion on the economics of dialysis and chronic kidney disease. Perit. Dial. Int. 29 (Suppl. 2), S222-226 (2009).
89. Thomas, B. et al. Maintenance dialysis throughout the world in years 1990 and 2010. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 26, 2621-2633 (2015).
90. Rosa-Diez, G. et al. Renal replacement therapy in Latin American end-stage renal disease. Clin. Kidney J. 7, 431-436 (2014). The Latin American Dialysis and Renal Transplant Registry (RLADTR) provides the best landscape of renal replacement therapy in this region, similar to USRDS in the USA.
91. Rosa-Diez, G. et al. Burden of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) in Latin America. Clin. Nephrol. 86 (Suppl. 1), 29-33 (2016).
92. Cusumano, A. M., Rosa-Diez, G. & Gonzalez-Bedat, M. C. Latin America Dialysis and Transplant Registry: experiencce and contributions to end-stage renal disease epidemiology. World J. Nephrol. 5, 389-397 (2016).
93. Pecoits-Filho, R. et al. Overview of peritoneal dialysis in Latin America. Perit. Dial. Int. 27, 316-321 (2007).
94. de Moraes, T. P. et al. Characterization of the BRAZPD II cohort and description of trends in peritoneal dialysis outcome across time periods. Perit. Dial. Int. 34, 714-723 (2014).
95. Naidoo, S. et al. Peritoneal dialysis in South Africa-A single centre experience. Indian J. Perit. Dial. 13, 18-21 (2008).
96. Abu-Aisha, H. & Elamin, S. Peritoneal dialysis in Africa. Perit. Dial. Int. 30, 23-28 (2010).
97. Swanepoel, C. R., Wearne, N. & Okpechi, I. G. Nephrology in Africa-not yet uhuru. Nat. Rev. Nephrol. 9, 610-622 (2013).
98. Bamgboye, E. L. The challenges of ESRD care in developing economies: sub-Saharan African opportunities for signficant improvement. Clin. Nephrol. 86 (Suppl. 1), 18-22 (2016).
99. Elamin, S., Obeid, W. & Abu-Aisha, H. Renal replacement therapy in Sudan, 2009. Arab J. Nephrol. Transplant. 3, 31-36 (2010).
100. El Matri, A., Elhassanb, E. A. M. & Abu-Aisha, H. Renal replacement therapy resources in Africa. Arab J. Nephrol. Transplant. 1, 9-14 (2008).
101. Karopadi, A. N., Mason, G., Rettore, E. & Ronco, C. The role of economies of scale in the cost of dialysis across the world: A macroeconomic perspective. Nephrol. Dial Transplant 29, 885-892 (2014).
102. Lo, W. K. Role of the International Society for Peritoneal Dialsysis (ISPD) in the future of peritoneal dialysis. Contrib. Nephrol. 163, 311-319 (2009).