Exploring non-participation in primary care physical activity interventions: PACE-UP trial interview findings

Trials

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2016, Pages

  Normansell, Rebecca ^a   Holmes, Rebecca ^a   Victor, Christina ^b   Cook, Derek G ^a   Kerry, Sally ^c   Iliffe, Steve ^d   Ussher, Michael ^a   Fox Rushby, Julia ^b   Whincup, Peter ^a   Harris, Tess ^a  

^a ST GEORGE'S UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b BRUNEL UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^c QUEEN MARY UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Exercise; Non participation; Primary Health Care; Qualitative; Randomised controlled trial; Walking

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; CONTROLLED STUDY; FAMILY RELATION; FEMALE; GENERAL PRACTICE; HEALTH PROGRAM; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PEDOMETRY; PHYSICAL ACTIVITY; PRIMARY MEDICAL CARE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SEMI STRUCTURED INTERVIEW; TELEPHONE INTERVIEW; TRAVEL; TREATMENT DURATION; WALKING; WORK; ACTIMETRY; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; DEVICES; EXERCISE; INTERVIEW; KINESIOTHERAPY; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SELECTION; PERCEPTION; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; PROCEDURES; PSYCHOLOGY; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); RESEARCH SUBJECT; UNITED KINGDOM; VERY ELDERLY;

ACTIGRAPHY; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; EXERCISE; EXERCISE THERAPY; FEMALE; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT ACCEPTANCE OF HEALTH CARE; PATIENT SELECTION; PERCEPTION; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; RESEARCH SUBJECTS; UNITED KINGDOM; WALKING;

EID: 85007453487     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17456215     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/S13063-016-1299-Z     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Tully MA, Cupples ME, Chan WS, McGlade K, Young IS. Brisk walking, fitness, and cardiovascular risk: a randomized controlled trial in primary care. Prev Med. 2005;41:622-8.
2. Stevens W, Hillsdon M, Thorogood M, McArdle D. Cost-effectiveness of a primary care based physical activity intervention in 45-74 year old men and women: a randomised controlled trial. Br J Sports Med. 1998;32:236-41.
3. Foster C, Brennan G, Matthews A, McAdam C, Fitzsimmons C, Mutrie N. Recruiting participants to walking intervention studies: a systematic review. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2011;8:137.
4. Glasgow RE, Vogt TM, Boles SM. Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM framework. Am J Public Health. 1999;89(9):1322-7.
5. Harris TJ, Victor CR, Carey IM, Adams R, Cook DG. Less healthy, but more active: opposing selection biases when recruiting older people to a physical activity study through primary care. BMC Public Health. 2008;8:182.
6. Lerman Y, Shemer J. Epidemiologic characteristics of participants and nonparticipants in health-promotion programs. Int J Occup Environ Med. 1996;38(5):535-8.
7. van Heuvelen MJ, Hochstenbach JB, Brouwer WH, et al. Differences between participants and non-participants in an RCT on physical activity and psychological interventions for older persons. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2005; 17:236-45.
8. Ives DG, Traven ND, Kuller LH, Schulz R. Selection bias and nonresponse to health promotion in older adults. Epidemiology. 1994;5:456-61.
9. Groenveld I, Proper K, van der Beek A, Hildebrandt V, van Mechelen W. Factors associated with non-participation and drop-out in a lifestyle intervention for workers with an elevated risk of cardiovascular disease. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2009;6:80.
10. Department of Health. Start active, stay active: a report on physical activity for health from the four home counties' Chief Medical Officers. 2011.
11. Hallal PC, Andersen LB, Bull FC, Guthold R, Haskell W, Ekelund U. Global physical activity levels: surveillance progress, pitfalls, and prospects. Lancet. 2012;380:247-57.
12. Joint Health Surveys Unit. Health surveys for England 2008. Physical activity and fitness. London: The NHS Information Centre for health and social care. 2009.
13. Public Health England. Our priorities 2013/2014. 2013.
14. NHS Health Check Programme. Best practice guidance. Department of Health. Public Health England. 2013
15. Harris T, Kerry S, Victor C, Shah S, Iliffe S, Ussher M, et al. Randomised controlled trial of a pedometer-based walking intervention with and without practice nurse support in primary care patients aged 45-75 years: protocol of the PACE-UP (Pedometer And Consultation Evaluation-UP) trial. Trials. 2013;14:418.
16. Harris T, Kerry S, Victor C, Ekelund U, Woodcock A, Iliffe S, et al. Randomised controlled trial of a complex intervention by primary care nurses to increase walking in patients aged 60-74 years: protocol of the PACE-Lift (Pedometer Accelerometer Consultation Evaluation-Lift) trial. BMC Public Health. 2013; 13:5. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-13-5.
17. Ritchie J, Spencer L. Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In: Bryman A, Burgess RG, editors. Analyzing qualitative data. London and New York: Routledge; 1994. p. 173-95.
18. Crombie IK, Irvine L, Williams B, et al. Why older people do not participate in leisure time physical activity: a survey of activity levels, beliefs and deterrents. Age Ageing. 2004;33:287-92.
19. Normansell R, Smith J, Victor C, Cook DG, Kerry S, Iliffe S, et al. Numbers are not the whole story: a qualitative exploration of barriers and facilitators to increased physical activity in a primary care based walking intervention. BMC Public Health. 2014;14:1272. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-14-1272.
20. Chinn D, White M, Howel D, Harland J, Drinkwater C. Factors associated with non-participation in a physical activity promotion trial. Public Health. 2006;120:309-19.
21. Rodgers A, Harris T, Victor C, et al. Which older people decline participation in a primary care trial of physical activity and why? Insights from a mixed methods approach. BMC Geriatr. 2014;14:46. doi:10.1186/1471-2318-14-46.
22. Chinn D, White M, Harland J, Drinkwater C, Raybould S. Barriers to physical activity and socioeconomic position: implications for health promotion. Epidemiol Community Health. 1999;53:191-2.
23. Justine M, Azizan A, Hassan V, Salleh Z, Manaf H. Barriers to participation in physical activity and exercise among middle-aged and elderly individuals. Singapore Med J. 2013;54(10):581-6.
24. Costello E, Kafchinski M, Vrazel J, Sullivan P. Motivators, barriers, and beliefs regarding physical activity in an older adult population. J Geriatr Phys Ther. 2011;34:138-47.
25. Cohen-Mansfield J, Marx MS, Guralnik JM. Motivators and barriers to exercise in an older community dwelling population. J Ageing Phys Act. 2003;11:242-53.
26. Booth M, Bauman A, Owen N, Gore C. Physical activity preferences, preferred sources of assistance, and perceived barriers to increased activity among physically inactive Australians. Prev Med. 1997;26:131-7.
27. Lakerveld J, IJzelenberg W, van Tulder M, Hellemans I, Rauwerda J, van Rossum A, et al. Motives for (not) participating in a lifestyle intervention trial. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2008;8:17. doi:10.1186/1471-2288-8-17.
28. Chao D, Foy CG, Farmer D. Exercise adherence among older adults: challenges and strategies. Control Clin Trials. 2000;21:212S-7.
29. Dishman R. Compliance/adherence in health-related exercise. Health Psychol. 1982;1(3):237-67.
30. Reichert F, Barros A, Domingues M, Hallal P. The role of perceived personal barriers to engagement in leisure-time physical activity. Am J Public Health. 2007;97(3):515-9.
31. Bostock N. GP pilots Skype consultations with patients. 15 March 2013. http://www.gponline.com/News/article/1174766/GP-pilots-Skypeconsultations-patients/. Accessed 29 September 2014.