AN INTEGRATIVE FRAMEWORK FOR KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT EFFECTIVENESS

Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems, ICIS 2001

Volumn , Issue , 2001, Pages 135-144

  Khalifa, Mohamed ^a   Lam, Rinky ^a   Lee, Matthew ^a  

^a CITY UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

Knowledge management effectiveness; knowledge management process

Indexed keywords

INFORMATION SYSTEMS; INFORMATION USE;

INTEGRATIVE FRAMEWORK; KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT EFFECTIVENESS; KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT PROCESS; KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT STRATEGY; MANAGEMENT EFFECTIVENESS; MANAGEMENT STRUCTURE; PATH MODELS;

KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT;

EID: 85007445370     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (29)

1. Alavi, M. “KPMG Peat Marwick U.S.: One Giant Brain,” Harvard Business School Case 9-397-108, 1997.
2. nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (CD-Rom Version), IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, CA, 1999.
3. Chin, W. W. PLS Graph Manual, Unpublished Manuscript, 1994.
4. Chin, W. W. “The Partial Least Squares Approach for Structural Equation Modeling,” in Modern Methods for Business Research, G. A. Marcoulides (ed.), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, 1998.
5. Chin, W. W., Gopal, A., and Salisbury W. D. “Advancing the Theory of Adaptive Structuration: The Development of a Scale to Measure Faithfulness of Appropriation,” Information Systems Research (41:3), 1997, pp. 125-145.
6. Cotterman, W., and Senn, J. Challenges and Strategies for Research in Information Systems Development, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, 1992.
7. Davenport, T. H. “Knowledge Management and the Broader Firm: Strategy, Advantage, and Performance” in Knowledge Management Handbook (eds. Liebowitz, J.), CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 1999.
8. Davenport, T. H., and Prusak, L. “Working Knowledge: How Organizations Manage What They Know,” Harvard Business School Press, Boston, 1998.
9. DeSanctis, G., and Poole, M. S. “Capturing the Complexity of Advanced Technology Use: Adaptive Structuration Theory,” Organization Science (5:2), 1994, pp. 121-147.
10. Earl, M. J., and Scott, L. A. “Opinion What is a Chief Knowledge Officer,” Sloan Management Review, Winter 1999, pp. 29-38.
11. Fischer, M., Brown, A., Attwell, G. and Owen, M. “The Development of an Experience-Based Documentation System for Maintenance Workers in Germany,” in Proceedings of the 32nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (CD-Rom Version), IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, CA, 1999.
12. Fornell, C., and Larcker, D. “Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variable and Measurement Error,” Journal of Marketing Research (18), 1981, pp. 39-50
13. Glasser, P. “The Knowledge Factor,” 1999 (http://www.cio.com/archive/010199-know_content.html).
14. Goodhue, D. L., and Thompson, R. L. “Task-Technology Fit and Individual Performance,” MIS Quarterly, June 1995, pp.213-236
15. Gopal, A., Bostrom, R. P., and Chin, W. W. “Applying Adaptive Structuration Theory to Investigate the Process of Group Support Systems Use,” Journal of Management Information Systems (9:3), 1993, pp. 45-69.
16. Gopal, C., and Gagnon, J. “Knowledge, Information, Learning and the IS Manager,” Computerworld (1:5),, 1995, pp. 1-7.
17. Hansen, M. T., Nohria, N., and Tierney, T. “What’s Your Strategy for Managing Knowledge?,” Harvard Business Review, March-April 1999, pp. 106-116.
18. nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (CD-Rom Version), IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, CA, 1999.
19. st Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (CD-Rom Version), IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, CA, 1998.
20. Manasco, B. “Leading Firms Develop Knowledge Strategies,” 1998 (http://webcom.com/quantera/Apqc.html).
21. Moore, G. C., and Benbasat, I. “Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation,” Information Systems Research (2:3), 1991, pp. 192-222.
22. Newell, S., and Scarbrough, H. “Intranets and Knowledge Management: Complex Processes and Ironic Outcomes,” in Proceedings of the 32nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (CD-Rom Version), IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, CA, 1999.
23. Pentland, B. T. “Information Systems and Organizational Learning: The Social Epistemology of Organizational Knowledge Systems,” Accounting, Management & Information Technology (5:1), 1995, pp. 1-21.
24. nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (CD-Rom Version), IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, CA, 1999.
25. Ruggles, R. “Knowledge Tools: Using Technology to Manage Knowledge Better,” 1997 (http://www.businessinnovation.ey.com/mko/html/toolsrr.html).
26. Werts, C. E., Linn, R. L., and Jöreskog, K. G. “Intraclass Reliability Estimates: Testing Structural Assumptions,” Educational and Psychological Measurement (34:0, 1974, pp. 25-33.
27. Wiig, K. M. “Knowledge Management: Where Did It Come From and Where Will It Go?,” Expert Systems with Application (13:1), 1997, pp. 1-14.
28. Wold, H. (ed.). “Introduction to the Second Generation of Multivariate Analysis,” in Theoretical Empiricism, Paragon House, New York, 1989, pp. vii-xi.
29. Zack, M. H. “Developing a Knowledge Strategy,” California Management Review (41:3), 1999, pp. 125-145.