Development of a tool to measure women's perception of respectful maternity care in public health facilities

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2016, Pages

  Sheferaw, Ephrem D ^a   Mengesha, Teka Z ^b   Wase, Solomon B ^b  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b ADDIS ABABA UNIVERSITY   (Ethiopia)

Author keywords

Disrespect and Abuse (D A); Respectful Maternity Care (RMC); Sca

Indexed keywords

CHILDBIRTH; CONFIRMATORY FACTOR ANALYSIS; CONSTRUCT VALIDITY; CONTENT VALIDITY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CRITERION RELATED VALIDITY; DATA ANALYSIS SOFTWARE; EXPLORATORY FACTOR ANALYSIS; FACE VALIDITY; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE FACILITY; HUMAN; INSTRUMENT VALIDATION; INTERVIEW; LIKERT SCALE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MATERNAL CARE; OBLIQUE ROTATION; PERCEPTION; POSTNATAL CARE; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; PUBLIC HEALTH; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RELIABILITY; RUNNING; SATISFACTION; SCIENTIST; VALIDATION PROCESS; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ETHIOPIA; FACTOR ANALYSIS; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; MATERNAL HEALTH SERVICE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PREGNANCY; PROCEDURES; PROFESSIONAL-PATIENT RELATIONSHIP; PSYCHOMETRY; REPRODUCIBILITY; STANDARDS; VALIDATION STUDY; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ETHIOPIA; FACTOR ANALYSIS, STATISTICAL; FEMALE; HEALTH FACILITIES; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMANS; MATERNAL HEALTH SERVICES; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PERCEPTION; PREGNANCY; PROFESSIONAL-PATIENT RELATIONS; PSYCHOMETRICS; QUALITY OF HEALTH CARE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 85007420562     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712393     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s12884-016-0848-5     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. World Health Organization (WHO). Trends in maternal mortality: 1990 to 2013 estimates by WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA, the World Bank and the United Nations Population Division. Geneva: WHO; 2014.
2. Central Statistical Agency [Ethiopia] and ICF International. Ethiopia demographic and health survey 2011. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, and Calverton, Maryland, USA: Central Statistical Agency and ICF International; 2012
3. Bowser D, Hill K. Exploring evidence for disrespect and abuse in facilitybased childbirth: report of a landscape analysis. Bethesda, Maryland, USA: USAID-TRAction Project, Harvard School of Public Health and University Research Corporation, LLC; 2010.
4. Maternal and Child Health Integrated Program (MCHIP). Cultural barriers to seeking maternal health care in Ethiopia: a review of the literature. Addis Ababa: Jhpiego; 2012.
5. Ross-Davie M. Measuring the quantity and quality of midwifery support of women during labour and childbirth: the development and testing of the 'Supportive Midwifery in Labour Instrument'. Stirling, Scotland, UK: University of Stirling; 2012.
6. World Health Organization (WHO), UNICEF, UNFPA. Women-friendly health services: experiences in maternal care. Mexico City: WHO/UNICEF/UNFPA; 1999.
7. The White Ribbon Alliance for Safe Motherhood. Respectful maternity care: the universal rights of childbearing women. White Ribbon Alliance. 2011. http://whiteribbonalliance.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/Final_RMC_Charter.pdf. Accessed 21 July 2015.
8. Moore M, Armbruster D, GraeffJ, Copeland R. Assessing the "caring" behaviors of skilled maternity care providers during labor and delivery: experience from Kenya and Bangladesh. Washington, DC: The CHANGE Project; 2002.
9. World Health Organization (WHO). The prevention and elimination of disrespect and abuse during facility-based childbirth: WHO statement. Geneva: WHO; 2014.
10. Sawyer A, Ayers S, Abbott J, Gyte G, Rabe H, Duley L. Measures of satisfaction with care during labour and birth: a comparative review. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013;13:108.
11. Kruk ME, Kujawski S, Mbaruku G, Ramsey K, Moyo W, Freedman LP. Disrespectful and abusive treatment during facility delivery in Tanzania: a facility and community survey. Health Policy Plan. 2014;1-8.
12. Warren C, Njuki R, Abuya T, Ndwuga C, Maingi G, Serwanga J, et al. Study protocol for promoting respectful maternity care initiative to assess, measure and design interventions to reduce disrespect and abuse during childbirth in Kenya. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013;13:21.
13. Costello AB, Osborne JW. Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assess Res Eval. 2005;10(7):1-9.
14. MacCallum RC, Widaman KF, Zhang S, Hong S. Sample size in factor analysis. Psychol Methods. 1999;4:84-99.
15. Worthington R, Whittaker T. Scale development research: A content analysis and recommendations for best practices. Counseling Psychologist. 2006;34, 806838 doi:10.1177/0011000006288127.
16. DeVellis RF. Scale development: theory and applications. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, California, USA: Sage; 2003.
17. Netemeyer RG, Sharma S, Bearden WO. Scaling procedures: issues and applications. Thousand Oaks, California, USA: Sage Publications; 2003.
18. de Gruijter DN, van der Kamp LJ. Statistical test theory for the behavioral sciences. New York: Chapman and Hall/CRC; 2008.
19. Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS. Using multivariate statistics. 5th ed. Boston: Pearson/Allyn and Bacon; 2007.