Using volumetric breast density to quantify the potential masking risk of mammographic density

American Journal of Roentgenology

Volumn 208, Issue 1, 2017, Pages 222-227

  Destounis, Stamatia ^a   Johnston, Lisa ^b   Highnam, Ralph ^b   Arieno, Andrea ^a   Morgan, Renee ^a   Chan, Ariane ^b  

^a Elizabeth Wende Breast Care ^*  (United States)

^b Volpara Solutions Limited   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Breast Cancer Risk; Breast Density; Interval Cancer; Mammography

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUTOMATION; BREAST CANCER; BREAST DENSITY; CANCER SCREENING; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTOR; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; VOLUMETRIC BREAST DENSITY; BREAST NEOPLASMS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; EARLY CANCER DIAGNOSIS; EVALUATION STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; NEW YORK; PATHOLOGY; PHOTON ABSORPTIOMETRY; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PREVALENCE; REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STANDARDS; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TUMOR VOLUME; UNITED STATES;

ABSORPTIOMETRY, PHOTON; BREAST NEOPLASMS; EARLY DETECTION OF CANCER; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; NEW YORK; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; PREVALENCE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RISK ASSESSMENT; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TUMOR BURDEN; UNITED STATES;

EID: 85007396981     PISSN: 0361803X     EISSN: 15463141     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2214/AJR.16.16489     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Shapiro S, Venet W, Strax P, Venet L, Roeser R. Selection, follow-up, and analysis in the Health Insurance Plan Study: a randomized trial with breast cancer screening. Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 1985; 67:65-74
2. Tabár L, Fagerberg CJ, Gad A, et al. Reduction in mortality from breast cancer after mass screening with mammography: randomised trial from the Breast Cancer Screening Working Group of the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare. Lancet 1985; 1:829-832
3. Assi V, Massat NJ, Thomas S, et al. A case-control study to assess the impact of mammographic density on breast cancer risk in women aged 40-49 at intermediate familial risk. Int J Cancer 2015; 136:2378-2387
4. Kerlikowske K. The mammogram that cried Wolfe. N Engl J Med 2007; 356:297-300
5. Carney PA, Miglioretti DL, Yankaskas BC, et al. Individual and combined effects of age, breast density, and hormone replacement therapy use on the accuracy of screening mammography. Ann Intern Med 2003; 138:168-175
6. McCormack VA, dos Santos Silva I. Breast density and parenchymal patterns as markers of breast cancer risk: a meta-Analysis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2006; 15:1159-1169
7. Eng A, Gallant Z, Shepherd J, et al. Digital mammographic density and breast cancer risk: a casecontrol study of six alternative density assessment methods. Breast Cancer Res 2014; 16:439
8. Boyd NF, Guo H, Martin LJ, et al. Mammographic density and the risk and detection of breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2007; 356:227-236
9. D'Orsi CJ, Bassett LW, Berg WA, et al. BI-RADS: mammography, 4th ed. In: D'Orsi CJ, Mendelson EB, Ikeda DM, et al. Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System: ACR BI-RADS-breast imaging atlas. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology, 2003
10. Sickles EA, D'Orsi CJ, Bassett LW, et al. ACR BI-RADS Mammography, 5th ed. In: D'Orsi CJ, Sickles EA, Mendelson EB, Morris EA, et al. ACR BI-RADS Atlas, Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System. R eston, VA: A merican C ollege o f Radiology, 2013
11. American College of Radiology website. ACR statement on reporting breast density in mammography reports and patient summaries. www.acr. org/About-Us/Media-Center/Position-Statements. April 24, 2012. Accessed August 30, 2016
12. Ng KH, Lau S. Vision 20/20: mammographic breast density and its clinical applications. Med Phys 2015; 42:7059-7077
13. Mandelson MT, Oestreicher N, Porter PL, et al. Breast density as a predictor of mammographic detection: comparison of interval-And screen-detected cancers. J Natl Cancer Inst 2000; 92:1081-1087
14. Ma L, Fishell E, Wright B, Hanna W, Allan S, Boyd NF. Case-control study of factors associated with failure to detect breast cancer by mammography. J Natl Cancer Inst 1992; 84:781-785
15. Holm J, Humphreys K, Li J, et al. Risk factors and tumor characteristics of interval cancers by mammographic density. J Clin Oncol 2015; 33:1030-1037
16. Yankaskas BC, Cleveland RJ, Schell MJ, Kozar R. Association of recall rates with sensitivity and positive predictive values of screening mammography. AJR 2001; 177:543-549
17. Kerlikowske K, Zhu W, Tosteson AN, et al. Identifying women with dense breasts at high risk for interval cancer: a cohort study. Ann Intern Med 2015; 162:673-681
18. Cecchini RS, Costantino JP, Cauley JA, et al. Body mass index and the risk for developing invasive breast cancer among high-risk women in NSABP P-1 and STAR breast cancer prevention trials. Cancer Prev Res (Phila) 2012; 5:583-592
19. Emaus MJ, Bakker MF, Peeters PH, et al. MR Imaging as an additional screening modality for the detection of breast cancer in women aged 50-75 years with extremely dense breasts: the DENSE Trial Study Design. Radiology 2015; 277:527-537
20. Berg WA, Blume JD, Cormack JB, et al. Combined screening with ultrasound and mammography vs mammography alone in women at elevated risk of breast cancer. JAMA 2008; 299:2151-2163
21. Ishida T, Suzuki A, Kawai M, et al. A randomized controlled trial to verify the efficacy of the use of ultrasonography in breast cancer screening aged 40-49 (J-START): 76 196 women registered. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2014; 44:134-140