Monitoring error rates in Illumina sequencing

Journal of Biomolecular Techniques

Volumn 27, Issue 4, 2016, Pages 125-128

  Manley, Leigh J ^a   Ma, Duanduan ^a   Levine, Stuart S ^a  

^a MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

Bioinformatics; Genomics; High throughput DNA

Indexed keywords

ACCOUNTING; BIOINFORMATICS; GENOMICS; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MONITORING; NEXT GENERATION SEQUENCING; POSTMARKETING SURVEILLANCE; ALGORITHM; DIAGNOSTIC ERROR; DNA SEQUENCE; HIGH THROUGHPUT SEQUENCING; HUMAN; MOLECULAR DIAGNOSIS; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; SOFTWARE; STANDARDS;

ALGORITHMS; BASE SEQUENCE; DIAGNOSTIC ERRORS; HIGH-THROUGHPUT NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCING; HUMANS; MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA; SOFTWARE;

EID: 85007236842     PISSN: 15240215     EISSN: 19434731     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.7171/jbt.16-2704-002     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Nakamura K, Oshima T, Morimoto T, et al. Sequence-specific error profile of Illumina sequencers. Nucleic Acids Res 2011;39:e90.
2. Ewing B, Green P. Base-calling of automated sequencer traces using Phred. II. Error probabilities. Genome Res 1998;8:186-194.
3. Understanding Illumina Quality Scores. San Diego, CA: Illumina, Inc., 2014;Pub. No. 770-2012-058.
4. Langmead B, Salzberg SL. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat Methods 2012;9:357-359.
5. Gordon A, Hannon GJ. FASTX-Toolkit Version 0.0.13 computer program 2010.
6. Quinlan AR, Hall IM. bedtools Version 2.20.1 computer program 2010.
7. Dohm JC, Lottaz C, Borodina T, Himmelbauer H. Substantial biases in ultra-short read data sets from high-throughput DNA sequencing. Nucleic Acids Res 2008;36:e105.
8. DePristo MA, Banks E, Poplin R, et al. A framework for variation discovery and genotyping using next-generation DNA sequencing data. Nat Genet 2011;43:491-498.