Diversity in domains of development: Research findings and their implications for gifted identification and programming

Roeper Review

Volumn 19, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 172-177

  Matthews, Dona J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85007109570     PISSN: 02783193     EISSN: 1940865X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02783199709553821     Document Type: Article

References (79)

1. Alsaker, F. D., & Olweus, D. (1992). Stability of global self-evaluations in early adolescence: A cohort longitudinal study. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 2, 123-145.
2. Arlin, P. K. (1984). Arlin Test of Formal Reasoning. East Aurora, New York: Slosson Educational Publications Inc.
3. Astington, J. W., & Olson, D. R. (1990). Metacognitive and metalinguistic language: Learning to talk about thought. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 39, 77-87.
4. Baltes, P. B., & Smith, J. 1990. Toward a psychology of wisdom and its ontogenesis. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.). Wisdom: Its nature, origins, and development (pp. 87-120). New York: Cambridge University Press.
5. Benbow, C. P. (1988). Sex differences in mathematical reasoning ability in intellectually talented preadolescents: Their nature, effecls and possible causes. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 11, 169-232.
6. Benbow, C. P., & Stanley, J. C. (1982). Consequences in high school and college of sex differences in mathematical reasoning ability: A longitudinal perspective. American Educational Research Journal, 19, 598-622.
7. Benbow, C. P., & Stanley, J. C. (Eds.). (1983). Academic Precocity: Aspects of its development. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
8. Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1993). Surpassing ourselves: An inquiry into the nature and implications of expertise. Chicago: Open Court.
9. Beminger, V. W. & Yates, C. M. (1993). Formal operational thought in the gifted: A post- Piagetian perspective. Roeper Review, 15, 220-224.
10. Bloom, B. S. (Ed.). (1985). Developing talent in young people. New York: Ballantine.
11. Blumenfeld, P. C., Soloway, E., Marx, R. W., Krajcik, J. S., Guzdial, M, & Palincsar, A. 1991. Motivating project-based learning: Sustaining the doing, supporting the learning. Educational Psychologist, 26, 369-398.
12. Callahan, C. M., & Hunsaker, S. L. (1992). To accelerate or not to accelerate: Evaluation gives the answer. GCT, March/April, 50-56.
13. Canadian Achievement Tests. (1983). Scarborough, Ontario: Canadian Test Centre/McGraw- Hill Ryerson.
14. Cartel], R. B. (1988). The meaning and strategic use of factor analysis. In J. R. Nesselroade & R. B. Cattell (Eds.), Handbook of multivariate experimental psychology (2nd ed.) (pp. 131- 203). New York: Plenum.
15. Cauce, A. M. (1987). School and peer competence in early adolescence: A test of domain-specific self-perceived competence. Developmental Psychology, 23, 287-291.
16. Cohn, S. J. (1988). Assessing the gifted child and adolescent. In C. J. Kestenbaum & D. T. Williams (Eds.), Handbook of clinical assessment of children and adolescents (pp. 355- 376). New York: New York University Press.
17. Cox, J. R., Kelly, J. & Brinson, P. (1988). The pyramid project: Implementing the Richardson Study recommendations. Roeper Review, 11, 37-43.
18. Damasio, A. R. (1994). Descartes' error: Emotion, reason, and the Human Brain. New York: Grosset, Putnam.
19. Elkind, D. (1970). Children and adolescents. New York: Oxford University Press.
20. Entwisle, D. R. (1990). Schools and the adolescent. In S. S. Feldman & G. R. Elliott (Eds.), At the threshold: The developing adolescent (pp. 197-224). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
21. Farmer, H. S. (1987). A multivariate model for explaining gender differences in career and achievement motivation. Educational Researcher, 16 (2), 5-9.
22. Feldhusen, J. F. (1992). Early admission and grade advancement for young gifted learners. GCT, March/April, 45-49.
23. Feldhusen, J. F. (1995). Talent development: The new direction in gifted education. Roeper Review, 18, 92.
24. Feldman, D. H. (1986). Nature's gambit: Child prodigies and the development of human potential. New York: Basic Books.
25. Ford, M. E. (1982). Social cognition and social competence in adolescence. Developmental Psychology, 18, 323-340.
26. Ford, M. E., & Tisak, M. S. (1983). A further search for social intelligence. Journal of Educational Psychology. 75(2), 196-206.
27. Fox, L. H. (1981). Identification of the academically gifted. American Psychologist, 36, 1103- 1111.
28. Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind. New York: Basic Books.
29. Gardner, H. (1993). Creating minds: An anatomy of creativity seen through the lives of Freud, Einstein, Picasso, Stravinsky, Eliot. Graham, and Gandhi. New York: Basic.
30. George, W. C., Cohn, S. J., & Stanley, J. C. (Eds.). (1979). Educating the gifted: Acceleration and enrichment. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
31. Glass, G. V., & Hopkins, K. D. (1984). Statistical methods in education and psychology (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
32. Goldstein, D., Stocking, V.B., & Godfrey, J.J. (in press). What we've learned from Talent Search research. In N. Colangelo & S. G. Assouline (Eds.), Proceedings of the Third Henry B. and Jocelyn Wallace National Research Symposium on Talent Development. Trillium Press.
33. Goleman, D. (1995). Emotional intelligence. New York: Bantam.
34. Gottfried, A.W., Gottfried, A.E., Bathurst, K., & Guerin, D.W. (1994): Gifted IQ: Early developmental aspects. New York: Plenum.
35. Harter, S. (1983). Developmental perspectives on the self-system. In E. M. Hetherington (Ed.), Socialization, personality and social development (pp. 275-385). Vol. IV, in P. H. Mussen (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology (4th ed.). New York: Wiley.
36. Harter, S. (1985). Manual for the Self-Perception Profile for Children. Denver, Colorado: University of Denver, (available from the author)
37. Hartup, W. W. (1978). Peer relations and the growth of social competence. In M. W. Kent & J. E. Rolf (Eds.), The primary prevention of psychopathology: Vol 3. Promoting social competence and coping in children (pp. 150-170). Hanover, PA: University Press of New England.
38. Hoge, R. D. (1988). Issues in the definition and measurement of the giftedness construct. Educational Researcher, 17(7), 12-16.
39. Hoge, R. D. (1989). An examination of the giftedness construct. Canadian Journal of Education, 14(1),6-17.
40. Horowitz, F. D. (1987). A developmental view of giftedness. Gifted Child Quarterly, 31, (4), 165-168.
41. Howe, M. J. A. (1990). The origins of exceptional abilities. Oxford, England: Basil Blackwell.
42. Jackson, N. E., & Butterfield, E. C. (1986). A conception of giftedness designed to promote research. In R. J. Stemberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 151- 181). New York: Cambridge University Press.
43. Jacobs, J. E., & Weisz, V. (1994). Gender stereotypes: Implications for gifted education. Roeper Review, 16, 152-155.
44. Kaiser, H. F. (1960). The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 141-151.
45. Keating, D. P. (1975). Testing those in the top percentiles. Exceptional Children, 41, 435-436.
46. Keating, D. P. (1991). Curriculum options for the developmentally advanced: A developmental alternative to gifted education. Exceptionality Education Canada, 1, 53-83.
47. Keating, D. P. & Matthews, D. J. (1990, March). Domain specificity and generality of higher order thinking. Poster presented at the biennial meeting of the Society for Research rn Adolescence, Atlanta.
48. Kornhaber, M., Krechevsky, M, & Gardner, H. (1990). Engaging intelligence. Educational Psychologist, 25 (3 & 4), 177-199.
49. Laine, C. J. & Blank, S. S. (1989). Integrative program policy for the gifted: Continuum or dichotomy? Canadian Journal of Education, 14 (1), 48-57.
50. Levenson, R. W., & Gottman, J. M. (1978). Toward the assessment of competence. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 45, 453-462.
51. Lupart, J., & McKeough, A. (1991). Toward an integrated model of gifted education. Exceptionality Education Canada, 1 (1), 1-12.
52. Matthews, D. J. (1992, March). Assessment in the social domain: Competence or cognition? Poster presented at the biennial meeting of the Society for Research on Adolescence. Washington, D.C.
53. Matthews, D. J. (1993). Linguistic giftedness in the context of domain-specific development. Exceptionality Education Canada, 3 (3), 1-23.
54. Matthews, D. J., & Keating, D. P. (1995). Domain specifity and habits of mind: An investigation of patterns of high-level development. Journal of Early Adolescence, 15, 319-343.
55. Meece, J. L., & Eccles, J. S. (1993). Introduction: Recent trends in research on gender and education. Educational Psychologist, 28, 313-319.
56. Pleiss, M. K., & Feldhusen, J. F. (1995). Mentors, role models, and heroes in the lives of gifted children. Educational Psychologist, 30 (3), 159-169.
57. Reis, S. M. (1987). We can't change what we don't recognize: Understanding the special needs of gifted females. Gifted Child Quarterly, 31 (2), 83-89.
58. Renzulli, J. S. (Ed.). (1986). Systems and models for developing programs for the gifted and talented. Mansfield, CT: Creative Learning Press.
59. Rimm, S. (1980). Group Inventory for Finding Creative Talent. Watertown, Wisconsin: Educational Assessment Service.
60. Robinson, F. G., & Puk, T. (1989). Planning strengthened programs for gifted elementary and secondary students. Canadian Journal of Education, 14(1), 58-73.
61. Robinson, N. M. & Robinson, H. B. (1982). The Optimal Match: Devising the best compromise for the highly gifted student. In D. Feldman (Ed,). New directions for child development: Developmental approaches to giftedness and creativity (pp. 79-94). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
62. Rosenberg, M. (1986). Self-concept from middle childhood through adolescence. In J. Suls & A. G. Greenwald (Eds.), Psychological perspectives on the self. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
63. Rubenstein, G., Fisher, L., & Iker, H. (1975). Peer observation of student behavior in elementary school classrooms. Developmental Psychology, 11, 867-868.
64. Selman, R. L., Beardslee, W., Schultz, L. H., Krupa, M., & Podorefsky, D. (1986). Assessing adolescent interpersonal negotiation strategies: Toward the integration of structural and functional models. Developmental Psychology, 22, 450-459.
65. Shore, B. M. (1991). Building a solid professional knowledge base in gifted education. Education Exceptionality Canada, 1 (1), 85-102.
66. Stanford Test of Academic Skills: Third Edition. (1989). The Psychological Corporation: Harcourt Brace Jovanovitch.
67. Stanley, J. C. (1977). The predictive value of the SAT for brilliant seventh and eighth graders. The College Board Review, 106, 2-7.
68. Stanley, J. C., & Benbow, C. P. (1986). Youths who reason exceptionally well mathematically. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 361-387). New York: Cambridge University Press.
69. Stevens, J. (1986). Applied Multivariate statistics for the social sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
70. Stevenson, H. W., & Stigler, J. W. (1992). The learning gap: Why our schools are failing and what we can learn from Japanese and Chinese education. New York: Summit Books.
71. Tanaka, J. S., & Westerman, M. A. (1988). Common dimensions in the assessment of competence in school-aged girls. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 579-584.
72. Test of Cognitive Skills. (1981). Monterey CA: McGraw-Hill.
73. VanTassel-Baska, J. (1995). The development of talent through curriculum. Roeper Review, 18, 98-102.
74. VanTassel-Baska, J., Olszewski-Kubilius, P., & Kulieke, M. (1994). A study of self-concept and social support in advantaged and disadvantaged seventh and eighth grade gifted students. Roeper Review, 16, 186-191.
75. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. (M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner & E. Souberman, Eds.). Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press. (Original work published 1930)
76. Waters, E., & Sroufe, L. A. (1983). Social competence as a developmental construct. Developmental Review, 3, 79-97.
77. Wellesley College Center for Research on Women. (1992). The AAUW Report: How schools shortchange girls. American Association of University Women Educational Foundation and National Education Association. Boston.
78. Wright, L., & Borland, J.H. (1992). A special friend: Adolescent mentors for young, economically disadvantaged, potentially gifted students. Roeper Review, 14, 124-129.
79. Wright, L., & Borland, J. H. (1993). Using early childhood developmental portfolios in the identification and education of young, economically disadvantaged, potentially gifted students. Roeper Review, 15, 205-210.