Does government effort or citizen word-of-mouth determine e-Government service diffusion?

Behaviour and Information Technology

Volumn 29, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 415-422

  Wang, Hui Chih ^a   Doong, Her Sen ^b  

^a NATIONAL CHUNG CHENG UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b NATIONAL CHIAYI UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Adoption; Diffusion; E Government service; Tax e filing system

Indexed keywords

EID: 85007080955     PISSN: 0144929X     EISSN: 13623001     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01449291003639897     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Akcura, M. T., and Altinkemer, K., 2002. Diffusion models for B2B, B2C, and P2P exchanges and E-Speak. Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, 12 (3):243–261.
2. Akman, I., 2005. Evaluation of some attributes of citizens. Government Information Quarterly, 22 (2):239–257.
3. Altinkemer, K., Yue, W. T., and Yu, L., 2003. Adoption of low earth orbit satellite systems:a diffusion model under competition. Information Technology and Management, 4 (1):33–54.
4. Bobrowski, S., and Bretschneider, S., 1994. Internal and external interorganizational relationships and their impact on the adoption of new technology:an exploratory study. Technological forecasting and social change, 46 (3):197–211.
5. Brown University. 2007. Delaware and Michigan are best states for American e-government [online] Available from:http://www.brown.edu/Administration/News_ Bureau/2007-08/07-010.html [Access 5 April 2008]
6. Cavaye, A., 1995. The sponsor-adopter gap differences between promoters and potential users of information systems that link organizations. International Journal of Information Management, 15 (2):85–96.
7. Chan, C. M.L., Lau, Y. M., and Pan, S. L., 2008. E- government implementation:a macro analysis of Singapore's e-government initiatives. Government Information Quarterly, 25 (2):239–255.
8. Davidson, R., and MacKinnon, J. G., 1981. Several tests for model specification in the presence of alternative hypotheses. Econometrica, 49 (3):781–793.
9. Devadoss, P. R., Pan, S. L., and Huang, J. C., 2003. Structurational analysis of e-government initiatives:a case study of SCO. Decision Support Systems, 34 (3):253–269.
10. Dos Santos, B. L., and Peffers, K., 1998. Competitor and vendor influence on the adoption of innovative applications in electronic commerce. Information & Management, 34 (3):175–184.
11. Fok, D., and Franses, P. H., 2007. Modeling the diffusion of scientific publications. Journal of Econometrics, 139 (2):376–390.
12. Hu, Q., Saunder, C., and Gebelt, M., 1997. Research report:diffusion of information systems outsourcing:a reevaluation of influences sources. Information Systems Research, 8 (3):288–301.
13. Jaeger, P. T., 2003. The endless wire:E-government as global phenomenon. Government Information Quarterly, 20 (4):323–331.
14. Kauffman, R., and Techatassanasoontorn, A., 2005. International diffusion of digital mobile technology:a coupled-hazard state-based approach. Information Technology and Management, 6 (2–3):253–292.
15. Mahajan, V., Muller, E., and Bass, F. M., 1995. Diffusion of new products:empirical generalizations and managerial uses. Marketing Science, 14 (3):79–88.
16. Mahajan, V., and Peterson, R. A., 1985. Models for innovation diffusion, Beverly Hill, CA:Sage Publication Inc.
17. Means, G., and Schneider, D., 2000. Meta-capitalism:the e-business revolution and the design of 21st century companies and markets, New York:John Wiley & Sons Inc.
18. Moon, J., and Bretschneider, S., 1997. Can state government action affect innovation and diffusion. Technology Forecasting and Social Change, 54 (1):57–77.
19. Rai, A., Ravichandran, T., and Samaddar, S., 1998. How to anticipate the Internet's global diffusion. Communications of the ACM, 41 (10):65–75.
20. Seyal, A. H., and Pijpers, G., 2004. Senior government executives' use of the Internet:a Bruneian scenario. Behaviour & Information Technology, 23 (3):97–210.
21. Taylor, J., Miriam, L., and Organ, J., 2007. Information-intensive government and the layering and sorting of citizenship. Public Money & Management, 27 (2):161–164.
22. Venkatraman, N., Loh, L., and Koh, J., 1994. The adoption of corporate governance mechanisms:a test of competing diffusion models. Management Science, 40 (4):496–507.
23. Wu, I. L., and Chen, J. L., 2005. An extension of trust and TAM model with TPB in the initial adoption of online tax:an empirical study. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 62 (6):784–808.
24. Yi, M. Y., Fiedler, K. D., and Park, J. S., 2006. Understanding the role of individual innovativeness in the acceptance of IT-based innovations:comparative analyses of models and measures. Decision Science, 37 (3):393–426.