The Tyranny of Methodologies in Information Systems Research

Data Base for Advances in Information Systems

Volumn 38, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 20-28

  Gallupe, R Brent ^a  

^a QUEEN S UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Information Systems Research; Research Methodologies

Indexed keywords

EID: 85007027393     PISSN: 00950033     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1145/1278253.1278258     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Bloomer, C. (2000). “Benevolent Tyranny,” EnterStageRight, web posted November 6, 2000.
2. Checkland, P. (1981). Systems Thinking, Systems Practice, Chichester, UK: John Wiley and Sons
3. Estes, R. (1996). Tyranny of the Bottom Line: Why Corporations Make Good People Do Bad Things, San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publications.
4. Gummesson, E. (2001). “Are Current Research Approaches in Marketing Leading Us Astray?” Marketing Theory, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 27–48.
5. Hunt, S.D. (1991). “Positivism and Paradigm Dominance in Consumer Research: Toward Critical Pluralism and Rapprochement,” Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 18, pp. 32–44.
6. McKendall, M. (1993). “The Tyranny of Change: Organizational Development Revisited,” Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 12, No. 2, pp. 93–104.
7. Pfeffer, J. (1993). “Barriers to the Advance of Organizational Science: Paradigm Development as a Dependent Variable,” Academy of Management Review. Vol. 18, No. 4, pp. 599–620.
8. Pogue, D. (2000). “In Praise of Corporate Tyranny,” http://www.macworld.com/2000/11/opinion/desktop_critic/
9. Robey, D. (2001). “Editors Comments by A. Lee,” MIS Quarterly, Vol. 25, No. 4, pp. v-xv.