Universal design for instruction: A framework for anticipating and responding to disability and other diverse learning needs in the college classroom

Equity and Excellence in Education

Volumn 36, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 40-49

  Scott, Sally S ^a   McGuire, Joan M ^a   Foley, Teresa E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85007024386     PISSN: 10665684     EISSN: 15473457     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10665680303502     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Adaptive Environments Center, Inc. (2000). Universal design. [On-line]. Available: http:www.adaptenv.org/universal/index.php
2. American Council on Education. (2000). Facts in brief: Enrollment in postsecondary education institutions increases, NCES report shows. Washington, DC: Higher Education and National Affairs, American Council on Education. [On-line]. Available: http://www.acenet.edu/hena/facts in brief/2000/02 28 00)fib.cfm
3. American Council on Education and American Association of University Professors. (2000). Does diversity make a difference? Three research studies on diversity in college classrooms. Washington, DC: Authors. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, P.L. 101-336, 104 Stat. 328, 42 U.S.C. x12101 et seq.
4. Bowe, F. (2000). Universal design in education: Teaching nontraditional students. Westport, CT: Bergin and Garvey.
5. Bransford, J., Brown, A. L., and Cocking, R. R. (Eds.). (1999). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
6. Bussel, A. (1992). Universal design: Is it for everyone? Progressive Architecture, 73(7), 19.
7. Caplan, R. (1992). Disabled by design: Remarks made by Ralph Caplan at the Universal Design conference. Interior Design, 63(11), 88-91.
8. Center for Applied Special Technology. (2002). Universal design for learning. [On-line]. Available: www.cast.org/udl
9. Center for Universal Design. (1997). The Center for Universal Design: Environments and products for all people. Raleigh, NC: North Carolina State University. [Online]. Available: http://www.ncsu.edu/ncsu/design/cud/index.html
10. Chickering, A. W., and Ehrmann, S. C. (1996). Implementing the seven principles: Technology as lever. Washington, DC: American Association for Higher Education. [Online]. Available: http://www.tltgroup.org/programs/seven.html
11. Chickering, A. W., and Gamson, Z. F. (1987). Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. American Association for Higher Education, Washington, DC (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED282491).
12. The Chronicle of Higher Education: Almanac 1999-2000. (1999). Washington, DC: The Chronicle of Higher Education. [On-line]. Available: http://chronicle.merit.edu/free/almanac/1999/nation/nation.htm
13. Covington, G. A., and Hannah, B. (1997). Access by design. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
14. Cross, K. P. (1998). What do we know about studentsÕ learning and how do we know it? American Association for Higher EducationÕs 1998 National Conference on Higher Education. Washington, DC: American Association for Higher Education. [On-line]. Available: http://www.aahe.org/nche/cross lecture.htm
15. Follette Story, M., Mueller, J. L., and Mace, R. L. (1998). The universal design file: Designing for people of all ages and abilities. Raleigh, NC: North Carolina State University, The Center for Universal Design. [On-line]. Available: http://www.ncsu.edu/ncsu/design/cud/pubs/center/books/ud file/toc3b14.htm
16. Henderson, C. (1999). College freshmen with disabilities, statistical year 1998. Washington, DC: American Council on Education.
17. Holmes-Siedle, J. (1994). Design for disability: Creating Universal Design. ArchitectsÕ Journal, 199(6), 35-41.
18. Kameenui, E. J., andCarnine, D. (1998). Effective teaching strategies that accommodate diverse learners. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
19. Kaufman, M. (1992). Universal design in focus. Metropolis, 12(4), 39-53.
20. Null, R. L., and Cherry, K. F. (1996). Universal design: Creative solutions for ADA compliance. Belmont, CA: Professional.
21. Orkwis, R., and McLane, K. (1998). A curriculum every student can use: Design principles for student access. ERIC/OSEP Topical Brief. Reston, VA: Office of Special Education Programs, U. S. Department of Education. Rehabilitation Act of 1973, Title Vx 504, P.L. 93-112, 87 Stat. 394, 29 U.S.C. x 794.
22. Scott, S., and McGuire, J. (2001, April). The application of Universal Design for Instruction (UDI) to college instruction: Creating a web site resource. Paper presented at the annual convention of the Council for Exceptional Children, Kansas City, MO.
23. Silver, P., Bourke, A., and Strehorn, K. (1998). Universal instructional design in higher education: An approach for inclusion. Equity and Excellence in Education, 31(2), 47-51.
24. Swanson, H. L., and Hoskyn, M. (1998). Experimental intervention research for students with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis of treatment outcomes. Review of Educational Research, 68(3), 277-321.
25. Swanson, H., Hoskyn, M., andLee, C. (1999). Interventions for students with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis of treatment outcomes. New York: Guilford.
26. Upcraft, M. L. (1996). Teaching todayÕs college students. In R. J. Menges, M. Weimer, and Associates (Eds.), Teaching on solid ground: Using scholarship to improve practice (pp. 21-41). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
27. Welch, P. (Ed.). (1995). Strategies for teaching universal design. Boston, MA: Adaptive Environments.
28. Wilkoff, W. L., and Abed, L.W. (1994). Practicing universal design: An interpretation of the ADA. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.