-
1
-
-
0021969885
-
The need for a research agenda
-
Bailar, J. C., & Patterson, K. (1985). The need for a research agenda. The New England Journal of Medicine, 312(10), 654–657. doi:10.1056/NEJM198503073121023
-
(1985)
The New England Journal of Medicine
, vol.312
, Issue.10
, pp. 654-657
-
-
Bailar, J.C.1
Patterson, K.2
-
2
-
-
34748870796
-
Peer review as professional responsibility: A quality control system only as good as the participants
-
Grainger, D. W. (2007). Peer review as professional responsibility: a quality control system only as good as the participants. Biomaterials, 28(34), 5199–5203. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.07.004
-
(2007)
Biomaterials
, vol.28
, Issue.34
, pp. 5199-5203
-
-
Grainger, D.W.1
-
3
-
-
33749315161
-
Quality assessment of reviewers’ reports using a simple instrument
-
Landkroon, A. P., Euser, A.M., Veeken, H., Hart, W., & Overbeke, A. J. (2006). Quality assessment of reviewers’ reports using a simple instrument. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 108(4), 979–985. doi:10.1097/01.AOG.0000231675.74957.48
-
(2006)
Obstetrics and Gynecology
, vol.108
, Issue.4
, pp. 979-985
-
-
Landkroon, A.P.1
Euser, A.M.2
Veeken, H.3
Hart, W.4
Overbeke, A.J.5
-
4
-
-
84913557922
-
We love our peers!
-
Reider, B. (2014). We love our peers!. The American Journal of Sports Medicine, 42(12), 2809–2811. doi:10.1177/0363546514560141
-
(2014)
The American Journal of Sports Medicine
, vol.42
, Issue.12
, pp. 2809-2811
-
-
Reider, B.1
-
5
-
-
0033051347
-
Development of the review quality instrument (RQI) for assessing peer reviews of manuscripts
-
van Rooyen, S., Black, N., & Godlee, F. (1999). Development of the review quality instrument (RQI) for assessing peer reviews of manuscripts. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 52(7), 625–629.
-
(1999)
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
, vol.52
, Issue.7
, pp. 625-629
-
-
Van Rooyen, S.1
Black, N.2
Godlee, F.3
-
6
-
-
0032527564
-
Effect of blinding and unmasking on the quality of peer review: A randomized trial
-
van Rooyen, S., Godlee, F., Evans, S., Smith, R., & Black, N. (1998). Effect of blinding and unmasking on the quality of peer review: a randomized trial. JAMA, 280(3), 234–237.
-
(1998)
JAMA
, vol.280
, Issue.3
, pp. 234-237
-
-
Van Rooyen, S.1
Godlee, F.2
Evans, S.3
Smith, R.4
Black, N.5
|