Photocatalytic decomposition of N 2 O over TiO 2 /g-C 3 N 4 photocatalysts heterojunction

Applied Surface Science

Volumn 396, Issue , 2017, Pages 1685-1695

  Koci K ^a   Reli, M ^a   Troppova I ^a   Sihor M ^a   Kupkova J ^a   Kustrowski, P ^b   Praus, P ^a  

^a VSB TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF OSTRAVA   (Czech Republic)

^b JAGIELLONIAN UNIVERSITY   (Poland)

Author keywords

Graphitic carbon nitride; Greenhouse gases; Photocatalysis; Titania

Indexed keywords

GREENHOUSE GASES; HETEROJUNCTIONS; HIGH RESOLUTION TRANSMISSION ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; INFRARED SPECTROSCOPY; IRRADIATION; NANOCOMPOSITES; NITROGEN OXIDES; PHOTOCATALYSIS; PHOTOCATALYSTS; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; TRANSMISSION ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; X RAY POWDER DIFFRACTION;

ABSORPTION EDGE ENERGIES; GRAPHITIC CARBON NITRIDES; NITROGEN PHYSISORPTION; PHOTOCATALYTIC ACTIVITIES; PHOTOCATALYTIC DECOMPOSITION; PHOTOELECTROCHEMICAL MEASUREMENTS; RECOMBINATION RATE; TITANIA;

TITANIUM DIOXIDE;

EID: 85006797753     PISSN: 01694332     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.11.242     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. 3 , BC and other major contributors to climate change. J. Photochem. Photobiol. C 12 (2011), 1–19.
2. 2 prepared by photodeposition. J. Catal. 194 (2000), 71–79.
3. 2 . Catal. Today 191 (2012), 134–137.
4. 2 O. Res. Chem. Intermed. 41 (2015), 9217–9231.
5. 2 Util. 14 (2016), 143–151.
6. 2 composite photocatalyst with extended absorption wavelength range and enhanced photocatalytic performance. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A 317 (2016), 151–160.
7. 2 nanocomposite thin films. Catal. Today 209 (2013), 170–175.
8. 2 through B, C, and N doping. J. Phys. Chem. C 118 (2014), 27415–27427.
9. [9] Gong, Y., Li, M., Wang, Y., Carbon nitride in energy conversion and storage: recent advances and future prospects. ChemSusChem 8 (2015), 931–946.
10. [10] Cao, S., Low, J., Yu, J., Jaroniec, M., Polymeric photocatalysts based on graphitic carbon nitride. Adv. Mater. 27 (2015), 2150–2176.
11. 2 reduction. Appl. Surf. Sci. 358 (2015), 15–27.
12. 4 hybrid with enhanced photocatalytic capability under visible light irradiation. J. Mater. Chem. A 22 (2012), 2721–2726.
13. 2 with enhanced visible light photocatalytic activity. Mater. Res. Bull. 76 (2016), 370–375.
14. 4 photocatalysis for NOx removal by Ag nanoparticles decoration. Appl. Surf. Sci. 358 (2015), 356–362.
15. 4 decorated ZnO nanorod arrays for enhanced photoelectrocatalytic performance. Appl. Surf. Sci. 358 (2015), 296–303.
16. 2 heterojunctions under UV and visible light conditions. Materials, 9, 2016, 286.
17. 2 composite with enhanced UV- and visible-light photocatalytic activity for NO oxidation. Appl. Catal. B 182 (2016), 587–597.
18. 2 heterojunction photocatalysts with enhanced visible light photocatalytic activity. Appl. Catal. B 187 (2016), 47–58.
19. 2 spheres with high photocatalytic activity under visible light irradiation. Appl. Catal. B 188 (2016), 342–350.
20. 2 under UV and visible light. Appl. Catal. B 184 (2016), 28–34.
21. 2 hybrids. Appl. Surf. Sci. 311 (2014), 574–581.
22. 2 nanocomposites for NOx removal. Catal. Today, 2016.
23. 2 composite photocatalysts for NOx removal. Chem. Eng. J., 2016.
24. 2 photocatalysts for the decomposition of formaldehyde in air. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 15 (2013), 16883–16890.
25. 2 photocatalyst co-exposed {001} and {101} facets and its enhanced photocatalytic activities for organic pollutant degradation and Cr(VI) reduction. Appl. Surf. Sci. 358 (2015), 223–230.
26. 2 /rGO) hybrids under visible light. Appl. Surf. Sci. 389 (2016), 1084–1093.
27. 4 photocatalyst and DFT study. Appl. Surf. Sci. 389 (2016), 496–506.
28. 2 nanomaterials. Chin. J. Catal. 36 (2015), 2049–2070.
29. 2 O. J. Phys. Chem. A 120 (2016), 8564–8573.
30. [30] Gregg, S.J., Sing, K.S.W., Adsorption, Surface Area and Porosity. 1982, Academic Press, London, New York.
31. [31] Schneider, P., Adsorption-isotherms of microporous mesoporous solids revisited. Appl. Catal. A 129 (1995), 157–165.
32. 2 evolution under visible light irradiation. J. Alloys Compd. 509 (2011), L26–L29.
33. 2 to CO. Appl. Catal. B 158–159 (2014), 20–29.
34. [34] Zhang, W., Zhang, Q., Dong, F., Zhao, Z., The multiple effects of precursors on the properties of polymeric carbon nitride. Int. J. Photoenergy 2013 (2013), 1–9.
35. 2 prepared via ball milling method. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 17 (2015), 3647–3652.
36. 2 microspheres with enhanced photocatalysis performance under visible-light irradiation. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 6 (2014), 14405–14414.
37. [37] Komatsu, T., The first synthesis and characterization of cyameluric high polymers. Macromol. Chem. Phys. 202 (2001), 19–25.
38. 4 limit visible light driven hydrogen evolution and photovoltage. J. Mater. Chem. A 2 (2014), 20338–20344.
39. 4 . Appl. Surf. Sci. 358:Part A (2015), 278–286.
40. 4 phase. Chem. Phys. Lett. 472 (2009), 69–73.
41. 2 powders. J. Lumin. 146 (2014), 199–204.
42. 4 nanopowders by low temperature thermal condensation of melamine. Sci. Rep. 3 (2013), 1–8.
43. 2 evolution by a simple method. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 39 (2014), 6354–6363.
44. 4 composites. J. Phys. Chem. Solids 72 (2011), 1319–1324.
45. 2 nanoparticles by reactive-layer-assisted deposition and characterization by XPS and STM. Nano Lett. 5 (2005), 1327–1332.
46. 3 /ethanol fluid under supercritical conditions. J. Phys. Chem. B 110 (2006), 1559–1565.
47. 4 composites with enhanced photocatalytic activity under visible light irradiation. Dalton Trans. 43 (2014), 982–989.
48. 4 and their visible-light photocatalytic and fluorescent properties. J. Mater. Chem. A 2 (2014), 2885–2890.
49. 4 composite with enhanced visible-light photoactivity for rhodamine degradation. RSC Adv., 4, 2014, 40029.
50. 4 ) material: electronic structure, photocatalytic and photoelectronic properties. J. Photochem. Photobiol. C 20 (2014), 33–50.