Archival reference: State of the art

Reference Librarian

Volumn 26, Issue 56, 1997, Pages 5-25

  Cross, James Edward ^a  

^a CLEMSON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85006601845     PISSN: 02763877     EISSN: 15411117     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1300/J120v26n56_02     Document Type: Article

References (87)

1. Whalen, Lucille (1985-1986). “Reference Services in Archives,” The Reference Librarian, 13.
2. Conway, Paul (1986). “Research in Presidential Libraries: A User Survey,”The Midwestern Archivist, 11:1, 35-56.
3. Goggin, Jacqueline (1986). “The Indirect Approach: A Study of Scholarly Users of Black and Women’s Organizational Records in the Library of Congress Manuscript Division,”The Midwestern Archivist,11:1, 57-67.
4. Mahler, William J. (1986). “The Use of User Studies,”The Midwestern Archivist,11:1,15-26.
5. Tumbaugh, RoyC. (1986). “Archival Mission and User Studies,”The Midwestern Archivist,9:1, 27-33.
6. Conway, Paul (1986). “Facts and Frameworks: An Approach to Studying the Users of Archives,”American Archivist,49:4, 393-407.
7. Conway, Paul This is borne out in recent publications on archival practice.
8. Cox, Richard J. (1992). Chapter 5, “Arranging, Describing, and Providing Reference in Institutional Archives,”Managing Institutional Archives: Foundational Principles and Practices(Greenwood library management collection) (pp. 117-153). New York: Greenwood Press.
9. Dearstyne, Bruce W. (1993). Chapter 9, “Reference Services,”The Aichival Enterprise: Modern Archival Principles, Practices and Management Techniques (pp. 174-196). Chicago: American Library Association.
10. Ellis, Judith (1993). “Access and Reference Services,”Keeping Archives, 2nd edition (pp. 273-305). Port Melbourne, Victoria, Australia: D. W. Thorpe and the Australian Society of Archivists.
11. Kepley, David R. (1988). Chapter 12, “Reference Service and Access” in Bradsher, James Gregory (Ed.), Managing Archives and Archival Institutions (pp. 161-173), Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
12. Maher, William J. (1992). “Use” and “Reference and Access Policies,”The Management of College and University Archives (pp. 126-147). Metuchen, NJ: The Society of American Archivists and The Scarecrow Press, Inc.
13. Pugh, Mary Jo (1992). Providing Reference Services for Archives and Manuscripts (Archival fundamentals series). Chicago: The Society of American Archivists.
14. Dearstyne, Bruce W. (1993). The Archival Enterprise: Modern Archival Principles, Practices and Management Techniques (pp. 175). Chicago: American Library Association.
15. Conway, Paul (1994). Partners in Research: Improving Access to the Nation s Archive: User Studies at the National Archives and Records Administration(pp. 53). Pittsburgh, PA: Archives and Museum Informatics.
16. Conway, Paul “The Reference Process” (pp. 41-53)
17. Conway, Paul “Providing Physical Access” (pp. 65-77) in Providing Reference Services for Archives and Manuscripts.
18. Pugh P., Providing Reference Services for Archives and Manuscripts, pp. 46.
19. Pugh P., Providing Reference Services for Archives and Manuscripts, pp. 59.
20. Hodson, Sara S. (1993). “Freeing the Dead Sea Scrolls: A Question of Access,”American Archivist,56:4, 690-703
21. Case, Barbara and Ying Xu (1994). “Access to Special Collections in the Humanities: Who’s Guarding the Gates and Why?,”The Reference Archivist,47, 129-146.
22. Peterson, Gary M. and Trudy Huskamp (1985). Archives and Manuscripts: Law(Basic manual series). Chicago: The Society of American Archivists
23. Greene, Mark A. (1993). “Moderation in Everything, Access in Nothing?: Opinions About Access Restrictions on Private Papers,”Archival Issues,18:1, 31-41.
24. Cogswell, Robert (1992). © Law for Unpublished Manuscripts and Archival Collections (pp. 38). Dobbs Ferry, NY: Glanville Publications, Inc.
25. Cogswell, Robert (1992). Copyright Law for Unpublished Manuscripts and Archival Collections (pp. 45). Dobbs Ferry, NY: Glanville Publications, Inc.
26. Peterson P., Archives and Manuscripts: Law.
27. James Cross (jcross@clemson.edu), “Archival Reference,” February 8, 1996, 21:54: 31-0500 (EST).
28. Gilliland-Swetland, Luke J. (1991). “The Provenance of a Profession: The Permanence of the Public Archives and Historical Manuscripts Traditions in American Archival History,”American Archivist,54:2,160-175.
29. Malbin, Susan L. (1996). “The Reference Interview in Archival Literature,”College and Research Libraries (C&RL)(forthcoming).
30. Dearstyne, Bruce W. (1987). “What Is the Use of Archives?: A Challenge for the Profession,”American Archivist,50:1, 76-87.
31. Ruth, Janice E. (1988). “Educating the Reference Archivist,”American Archivist,51:3, 266-276.
32. Jimerson, Randall C. (1989). “Redefining Archival Identity: Meeting User Needs in the Information Society,”American Archivist, 52:3, 332-340.
33. Freeman, Elsie T. (1991). “Soap and Education: Archival Training, Public Service and the Profession-an Essay,”The Midwestern Archivist, 16:2, 87-94.
34. Grabowski, John J. (1992). “Keepers, Users and Funders: Building an Awareness of Archival Value,”American Archivist,55:3,464-472.
35. Heald, Carolyn A. (1992). “Reference Service in Archives: Wither a Professional Ethos?,”Canadian Library Journal,49:5, 353-359.
36. Terry Eastwood (slais@unixg.ubc.ca) to James Cross (jcross@clemson.edu), “List Message on Reference Service,” February 15,1996, 17:24:03-0800 (PST).
37. Tumbaugh T., “Archival Mission and User Studies”.
38. Cook, Terry (1990-1991). “Viewing the World Upside Down: Reflections on the Theoretical Underpinnings of Archival Public Programming,” Archivaría, 31 (Winter 1990-1991), 123-134.
39. Nesmith, Tom (1993). “Introduction: Archival Studies in English-Speaking Canada and the North American Rediscovery of Provenance” (pp. 20-22)
40. Blais, Gabrielle and Enns, David (1993). “From Paper Archives to People Archives: Public Programming in the Management of Archives” (pp. 443-459), in Nesmith, Tom (Ed.), Canadian Archival Studies and the Rediscovery of Provenance.Metuchen, NJ: The Scarecrow Press, Inc.
41. Long, Linda J. (1989). “Question Negotiation in the Archival Setting: The Use of Interpersonal Communication Techniques in the Reference Interview,”American Archivist,52:1,40-50.
42. Malbin M., “The Reference Interview in Archival Literature
43. Conway C., “Facts and Frameworks: An Approach to Studying the Users of Archives
44. Pugh P., Providing Reference Services for Aichives and Manuscripts, pp. 72.
45. Dowler, Lawrence (1988). “The Role of Use in Defining Archival Practice and Principles: A Research Agenda for the Availability and Use of Records,”American Aichivist,51:1-2, 74-86.
46. Cox, Richard J. (1992). “Researching Archival Reference as an Information Function: Observations on Needs and Opportunities,”Reference Quarterly (RQ),31 (Spring 1992), 387-397.
47. Conway C., “Research in Presidential Libraries: A User Survey
48. Conway C., Partners in Research.
49. Mahler M., “The Use of User Studies
50. Skemer, Don C. (1991). “Drifting Disciplines, Enduring Records: Political Science and the Use of Archives,”American Archivist,54:3,356-368.
51. Yakel, Elizabeth and Bost, Laura L. (1994). “Understanding Administrative Use and Users in University Archives,”American Archivist,57:4, 596-615.
52. Orbach, Barbara C. (1991). “The View from the Researcher’s Desk: Historians’ Perceptions of Research and Repositories,” American Archivist,54:1, 28-43.
53. Goggin G., “The Indirect Approach
54. Miller, Fredric (1986). “Use, Appraisal and Research: A Case Study of Social History,”American Archivist,49:4, 371-392.
55. Beattie, Diane L. (1989-1990). “An Archival User Study: Researchers in the Field of Women’s History,” Archivaría, 29 (Winter 1989-1990), 33-50.
56. Gordon, Ann D. (1992). Using the Nation’s Documentary Heritage: The Report of the Historical Documents Study.Washington, D.C.: National Historical Publications and Records Commission.
57. Cox, Richard J. (1991). “Archivists and the Use of Archival Records. or, a View from the World of Documentary Editing” (review essay), Provenance, 9:1-2, 89-110.
58. Bearman, David (1989-1990). “User Presentation Language in Archives,” Archives and Museum Informatics, 3 (Winter 1989-1990), 3-7.
59. Spindler, Robert P. and Pearce-Moses, Richard (1993). “Does AMC Mean ‘Archives Made Confusing’?: Patron Understanding of USMARC AMC records,”American Archivist, 56:2, 330-341.
60. Tibbo, Helen R, (1994). “The Epic Struggle: Subject Retrieval from Large Bibliographic Databases,”American Archivist,57:2, 310-326.
61. Michelson, Avra and Rothenberg, Jeff (1992). “Scholarly Communication and Information Technology: Exploring the Impact of Changes in the Research Process on Archives,”American Archivist,55:2,236-315.
62. Tibbo, Helen R., “Interviewing Techniques for Remote Reference: Electronic vs. Traditional Environments”. Paper given at the session “Virtually Yours: Doing Archival Reference Electronically,” 58th Annual Meeting of the Society of American Archivists, Indianapolis, IN, September 8, 1994.
63. Tibbo, Helen R., “Interviewing Techniques for Remote Reference: Electronic vs. Traditional Environments”. Paper given at the session “Virtually Yours: Doing Archival Reference Electronically,” 58th Annual Meeting of the Society of American Archivists, Indianapolis, IN, September 8, 1994. pp. 7-9.
64. Paul Hedges (Paul.Hedges@ccmail.adp.wisc.edu) to Archives & Archivists List, “Archives E-Mail Reference Survey Response (LONG),” October 19, 1994, 14:50:38 CST.
65. Tibbo T., telephone conversation, March 21, 1996.
66. Scroggins, John, “Automating Reference at the National Archives”. Paper given at the session “Virtually Yours: Doing Archival Reference Electronically,” 58th Annual Meeting of the Society of American Archivists, Indianapolis, IN, September 8,1994.
67. Hull, Theodore J. and Adams, Margaret O. (1995). “Electronic Communications for Reference Services: A Case Study,”Government Information Quarterly,12:3, 297-308
68. Hull, Theodore (1995). “Reference Services and Electronic Records: The Impact of Changing Methods of Communication and Access,”Reference Services Review,23:2, 73-78.
69. Wallace, David A. (1995). “Archival Repositories on the World Wide Web: A Preliminary Survey and Analysis,”Archives & Museum Informatics, 9:2, 151-169.
70. Scroggins S., “Automating Reference at the National Archives
71. Hedlin, Edie and Harrison, Donald F. (1988) “The National Archives and Electronic Data” (pp. 15) and Hedstrom, Margaret
72. Kowlowitz, Alan (1988). “Meeting the Challenge of Machine-Readable Records: A State Archives Perspective” (pp. 36), Reference Services Review,16:1-2.
73. Gilliland-Swetland, Anne J., “Building and Promoting the Use of Electronic Reference Tools for Primary Sources: Some Management Considerations”. Paper given at the session “Virtually Yours: Doing Archival Reference Electronically,” 58th Annual Meeting of the Society of American Archivists, Indianapolis, IN, September 8, 1994.
74. Dean DeBolt (ddebolt@uwf.cc.uwf.edu) to Archives & Archivists List, “Service Philosophy,” March 13, 1996, 15:11:01 CDT.
75. Tibbo T., telephone conversation, March 21, 1996.
76. Nancy Bartlett, Bentley Library, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, May 13, 1996.
77. Tibbo T., “Interviewing Techniques for Remote Reference
78. Bartlett B., telephone conversation, May 13, 1996.
79. Bartlett B., Telephone conversation with Mary Jo Pugh, San Francisco Maritime National Historical Park, CA, April 29,1996.
80. Bartlett B., telephone conversation, May 13, 1996.
81. Tibbo T., “Interviewing Techniques for Remote Reference
82. Tibbo T., telephone conversation, March 21,1996.
83. Conway C., Partners in Research, pp. 83-84.
84. Gilliland-Swetland G., “Building and Promoting the Use of Electronic Reference Tools for Primary Sources
85. Bearman, David (1989). Archival Methods (Archives and Museum Informatics Technical Report No. 9). Pittsburgh, PA: Archives and Museum Informatics.
86. Michelson, Avra (1994). “Research Trends: Introduction,”American Archivist,57:1, 110-113.
87. Gray, Ann S. and Geraci, Diane (1995). “Complex Reference Services: Data Files for Social Research,”The Reference Librarian,48, 137-140.