Alternatives: Refinement, reduction, and replacement of animal use in the life sciences

Handbook of Laboratory Animal Science, Second Edition: Essential Principles and Practices

Volumn 1, Issue , 2002, Pages 539-545

  Goldberg, Alan M ^a   Drnec, Kimberly ^a  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85006583990     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (31)

1. Russell, W.M.S. and Burch, R.L., The Principles of Humane Experimental Technique, Methuen, London, 1959.
2. Broom, D., Animal Welfare defined in terms of attempts to cope with the environment, Acta Agric. Scand. Sect. A Animal Sci. Suppl. 27, 22, 1996.
3. Duncan, I. and Petherick, J.C., Implications of cognitive processes for animal welfare, J. Anim. Sci., 69, 5017, 1991.
4. Lord Soulsby of Swaffham Prior and Morton, D., Eds., Pain: its nature and management in man and animals, in International Congress and Symposium Series, The Royal Society of Medicine Press, London, 2000, p. 246.
5. Dol, M., et al., Eds., Animal Consciousness and Animal Ethics, Van Gorcum & Comp, The Netherlands, 1997.
6. Markowitz, H., New and proven enrichment techniques: research models and environmental enrichment procedures are critically interdependent, in Proceedings of the 51st National Meeting of the American Association of Laboratory Animal Scientists, San Diego, CA, 2000.
7. Guilarte, T., Environmental enrichment reverses cognitive deficits induced by lead, abstract for Society of Toxicology, The Toxicologist, 2002.
8. Senator Robert Dole, communication to Animal Research Defense Fund, http://caat.jhsph.edu/issues/doleletter.htm.
9. National Research Council, Toxicity Testing: Strategies to Determine Needs and Priorities, National Academy Press, Washington, 1984.
10. Roe, D., et al., Toxic Ignorance, http://www.environmentaldefense.org/documents/243_toxicignorance. htm, Environmental Defense Fund, 1997.
11. http://www.epa.gov/chemrtk/volchall.htm.
12. European Union, http://europa.eu.int/comm/enterprise/chemicals/chempol/whitepaper/report.pdf.
13. Green, S. and Goldberg, A.M., Proceedings of the 4th World Congress on Alternatives and Animals in the Life Sciences, In preparation.
14. Green, S., Goldberg, A.M., and Zurlo, J., The TestSmart - HPV program - development of an integrated approach for testing high production volume chemicals, Regul. Toxicol. and Pharm., 33, 105, 2001.
15. Green, S., Goldberg, A.M., and Zurlo, J., TestSmart-high production volume chemicals: an approach to implementing alternatives into regulatory toxicology, Toxicol. Sci., 63, 6, 2001.
16. Silbergeld, E., personal communication.
17. Wagner, H. and Cooper, J., Horseshoe crabs provide alternatives to rabbit bioassay, CAAT Newsletter, 2, 1, 1983, http://caat.jhsph.edu/pubs/newsletter/news_fall83/horseshoe.htm.
18. Hartung, T. and Wendel, A., Detection of pyrogens using human whole blood, Altex, 12, 2, 1995.
19. Alternatives to Laboratory Animals (ATLA), published by Fund for the Replacement of Animals in Medical Experiments, Nottingham, UK.
20. Cell Biology and Toxicology, Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands; In Vitro Animal, published by Society for In Vitro Biology, Largo, Maryland.
21. In Vitro Toxicology, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.
22. Toxicology In Vitro, Pergamon Press, Oxford; Elmsford, NY.
23. Dagues, N., et al., Correlation of in vivo studies and in vitro human epidermis model for dermal xenobiotic-induced toxicity, Pierre Fabre Research Institute at the Controlled Release Society, San Diego, CA, 2001.
24. De Wever, B., Cappadora, M., and Rosdy, M., Prediction of acute and chronic skin irritation using human epidermis reconstituted in vitro in chemically defined medium, by SkinEthic Laboratories at the Eurotox Meeting, Istanbul, Turkey, Toxicology Letters, Elsevier, Amsterdam; New York, 2001.
25. Jones, P. et al., The effects of known eye irritants on the SkinEthic and Epiocular models of corneal epithelium, by Unilever Safety and Environmental Assurance Center (SEAC) at the European Tissue Culture Society, Granada, Spain, Toxicology Letters, Elsevier, Amsterdam; New York, 2001.
26. Bonowitz, A. et al., Comparative therapeutic and toxic effects of different povidone iodine (PVP-1) formulations in a aodel of oral candidosis based on in vitro reconstituted epithelium by the University of Munich, Germany and Mundi Pharma, J. Drug Targeting, 9, 75, 2001.
27. Raggen, E. et al., The use of airlifted reconstituted human lung epithelial tissues to predict in vitro the allergenic risk of topically applied enzyme proteins, by Novozymes Research & Development at the Eurotox Meeting, Instanbul, Turkey, Toxicology Letters, Elsevier, Amsterdam; New York, 2001.
28. Klausner, M., et al., The Epiocular tissue model: in vivo versus in vitro Draize scores for consumer products, Toxicol. Sci., 54, 188, 2000.
29. ILAR, NRC, 42 (3), 187, 2001.
30. http://www.xenogen.com.
31. ILAR, NRC, 40, 1 1999.