National proficiency-gain curves for minimally invasive gastrointestinal cancer surgery

British Journal of Surgery

Volumn 103, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 88-96

  Mackenzie, H ^a   Markar, S R ^a   Askari, A ^b   Ni, M ^a   Faiz, O ^a,b   Hanna, G B ^a  

^a IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b ST MARK S HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85006513346     PISSN: 00071323     EISSN: 13652168     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bjs.9963     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. van der Pas MH, Haglind E, Cuesta MA, Fürst A, Lacy AM, Hop WC et al.; COlorectal cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection II (COLOR II) Study Group. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer (COLOR II): short-term outcomes of a randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2013; 14: 210–218.
2. Veldkamp R, Kuhry E, Hop WC, Jeekel J, Kazemier G, Bonjer HJ et al.; COlon cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection Study Group (COLOR). Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 2005; 6: 477–484.
3. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Laparoscopic Surgery for Colorectal Cancer. NICE technology appraisal guidance TA105; 2006. http://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ta105 [accessed 18 November 2014].
4. Coleman MG, Hanna GB, Kennedy R. The National Programme for Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery in England: a new training paradigm. Colorectal Dis 2011; 13: 614–616.
5. Health and Social Care Information Centre. National Bowel Cancer Audit Progress Report. Tripartite Colorectal Meeting, Birmingham 2014. http://www.hscic.gov.uk/bowel [accessed 25 January 2015].
6. Biere SS, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Maas KW, Bonavina L, Rosman C, Garcia JR et al. Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2012; 379: 1887–1892.
7. Mamidanna R, Bottle A, Aylin P, Faiz O, Hanna GB. Short-term outcomes following open versus minimally invasive esophagectomy for cancer in England: a population-based national study. Ann Surg 2012; 255: 197–203.
8. Mamidanna R, Almoudaris AM, Bottle A, Aylin P, Faiz O, Hanna GB. National outcomes and uptake of laparoscopic gastrectomy for cancer in England. Surg Endosc 2013; 27: 3348–3358.
9. Health and Social Care Information Centre. National Oesophago-Gastric Cancer Audit; 2013. http://www.hscic.gov.uk/og [accessed 18 November 2014].
10. Miskovic D, Ni M, Wyles SM, Tekkis P, Hanna GB. Learning curve and case selection in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: systematic review and international multicenter analysis of 4852 cases. Dis Colon Rectum 2012; 55: 1300–1310.
11. Tapias LF, Morse CR. Minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy: description of a learning curve. J Am Coll Surg 2014; 218: 1130–1140.
12. Zhou D, Quan Z, Wang J, Zhao M, Yang Y. Laparoscopic-assisted versus open distal gastrectomy with D2 lymph node resection for advanced gastric cancer: effect of learning curve on short-term outcomes, a meta-analysis. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2014; 24: 139–150.
13. Health and Social Care Information Centre. Hospital Episode Statistics. http://www.hscic.gov.uk/hes [accessed 1 September 2014].
14. Mackenzie H, Miskovic D, Coleman MG, Hanna GB. Evaluation of the National Training Programme for Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery of England. Tripartite Colorectal Meeting, Birmingham, 2014.
15. Miskovic D, Ni M, Wyles SM, Parvaiz A, Hanna GB. Observational clinical human reliability analysis (OCHRA) for competency assessment in laparoscopic colorectal surgery at the specialist level. Surg Endosc 2012; 26: 796–803.
16. Markar SR, Wiggins T, Ni M, Steyerberg EW, Van Lanschot JJ, Sasako M et al. Assessment of the quality of surgery within randomised controlled trials for the treatment of gastro-esophageal cancer: a systematic review. Lancet Oncol 2015; 6: e23.
17. McCulloch P, Altman DG, Campbell WB, Flum DR, Glasziou P, Marshall JC et al. No surgical innovation without evaluation: the IDEAL recommendations. Lancet 2009; 374: 1105–1112.
18. Campbell SE, Campbell MK, Grimshaw JM, Walker AE. A systematic review of discharge coding accuracy. J Public Health Med 2001; 23: 205–211.
19. Burns EM, Rigby E, Mamidanna R, Bottle A, Aylin P, Ziprin P et al. Systematic review of discharge coding accuracy. J Public Health (Oxford) 2012; 34: 138–148.
20. Holt P, Poloniecki J, Thompson MM. Multicentre study of the quality of a large administrative data set and implications for comparing death rates. Br J Surg 2012; 99: 58–65.