Massive dysregulation of genes involved in cell signaling and placental development in cloned cattle conceptus and maternal endometrium

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 113, Issue 51, 2016, Pages 14492-14501

  Biase, Fernando H ^a,e   Rabel, Chanaka ^a   Guillomot, Michel ^b   Hue, Isabelle ^b   Andropolis, Kalista ^a   Olmstead, Colleen A ^a   Oliveira, Rosane ^a   Wallace, Richard ^a   Le Bourhis, Daniel ^b   Richard, Christophe ^b,c   Campion, Evelyne ^b   Chaulot Talmon, Aurélie ^b   Giraud Delville, Corinne ^b   Taghouti, Géraldine ^b   Jammes, Hélène ^b   Renard, Jean Paul ^b   Sandra, Olivier ^b   Lewin, Harris A ^a,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITÉ PARIS SACLAY   (France)

^c INRA   (France)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^e AUBURN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Conceptus; Conceptus maternal communication; Placentation; Somatic cell nuclear transfer

Indexed keywords

RNA; TRANSCRIPTOME;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL INSEMINATION; BOVINE; CHORION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EMBRYO; ENDOMETRIUM; FEMALE; FETUS MEMBRANE; FIRST TRIMESTER PREGNANCY; GENE EXPRESSION; MOUSE; NIDATION; NONHUMAN; PHENOTYPE; PLACENTA DEVELOPMENT; PREIMPLANTATION EMBRYO; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RNA SEQUENCE; SURVIVAL; ANIMAL; BREEDING; CELL NUCLEUS TRANSPLANTATION; CLONING; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; METABOLISM; PLACENTA; PREGNANCY; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; TIME FACTOR; TROPHOBLAST; UTERUS;

ANIMALS; CATTLE; CLONING, ORGANISM; EMBRYO IMPLANTATION; ENDOMETRIUM; FEMALE; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, DEVELOPMENTAL; INSEMINATION, ARTIFICIAL; NUCLEAR TRANSFER TECHNIQUES; PLACENTA; PLACENTATION; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY, ANIMAL; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; TIME FACTORS; TRANSCRIPTOME; TROPHOBLASTS; UTERUS;

EID: 85006499465     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1520945114     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Sandra O, et al. (2015) Maternal organism and embryo biosensoring: Insights from ruminants. J Reprod Immunol 108:105-113.
2. Bazer FW, Burghardt RC, Johnson GA, Spencer TE, Wu G (2008) Interferons and progesterone for establishment and maintenance of pregnancy: Interactions among novel cell signaling pathways. Reprod Biol 8(3):179-211.
3. Spencer TE, Sandra O, Wolf E (2008) Genes involved in conceptus-endometrial interactions in ruminants: Insights from reductionism and thoughts on holistic approaches. Reproduction 135(2):165-179.
4. Forde N, et al. (2009) Progesterone-regulated changes in endometrial gene expression contribute to advanced conceptus development in cattle. Biol Reprod 81(4):784-794.
5. Forde N, Lonergan P (2012) Transcriptomic analysis of the bovine endometrium: What is required to establish uterine receptivity to implantation in cattle? J Reprod Dev 58(2):189-195.
6. Mamo S, Mehta JP, Forde N, McGettigan P, Lonergan P (2012) Conceptus-endometrium crosstalk during maternal recognition of pregnancy in cattle. Biol Reprod 87(1):6, 1-9.
7. Diskin MG, Parr MH, Morris DG (2011) Embryo death in cattle: An update. Reprod Fertil Dev 24(1):244-251.
8. Fritz S, et al. (2013) Detection of haplotypes associated with prenatal death in dairy cattle and identification of deleterious mutations in GART, SHBG and SLC37A2. PLoS One 8(6):e65550.
9. Kadri NK, et al. (2014) A 660-Kb deletion with antagonistic effects on fertility and milk production segregates at high frequency in Nordic Red cattle: Additional evidence for the common occurrence of balancing selection in livestock. PLoS Genet 10(1):e1004049.
10. Minten MA, et al. (2013) Effects of fertility on gene expression and function of the bovine endometrium. PLoS One 8(8):e69444.
11. Hue I, Degrelle SA, Turenne N (2012) Conceptus elongation in cattle: Genes, models and questions. Anim Reprod Sci 134(1-2):19-28.
12. Chavatte-Palmer P, et al. (2012) Review: Placental perturbations induce the developmental abnormalities often observed in bovine somatic cell nuclear transfer. Placenta 33(suppl):S99-S104.
13. Bauersachs S, et al. (2009) The endometrium responds differently to cloned versus fertilized embryos. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106(14):5681-5686.
14. Mansouri-Attia N, et al. (2009) Endometrium as an early sensor of in vitro embryo manipulation technologies. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106(14):5687-5692.
15. Guillomot M, et al. (2010) Abnormal expression of the imprinted gene Phlda2 in cloned bovine placenta. Placenta 31(6):482-490.
16. Farin PW, Piedrahita JA, Farin CE (2006) Errors in development of fetuses and placentas from in vitro-produced bovine embryos. Theriogenology 65(1):178-191.
17. Everts RE, et al. (2008) Aberrant gene expression patterns in placentomes are associated with phenotypically normal and abnormal cattle cloned by somatic cell nuclear transfer. Physiol Genomics 33(1):65-77.
18. Smith SL, et al. (2005) Global gene expression profiles reveal significant nuclear reprogramming by the blastocyst stage after cloning. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102(49):17582-17587.
19. Degrelle SA, et al. (2012) Uncoupled embryonic and extra-embryonic tissues compromise blastocyst development after somatic cell nuclear transfer. PLoS One 7(6):e38309.
20. Yang L, et al. (2005) Expression of imprinted genes is aberrant in deceased newborn cloned calves and relatively normal in surviving adult clones. Mol Reprod Dev 71(4):431-438.
21. Gong Z-J, et al. (2012) Aberrant expression of imprinted genes and their regulatory network in cloned cattle. Theriogenology 78(4):858-866.
22. Hill JR, et al. (2000) Evidence for placental abnormality as the major cause of mortality in first-trimester somatic cell cloned bovine fetuses. Biol Reprod 63(6):1787-1794.
23. Constant F, et al. (2006) Large offspring or large placenta syndrome? Morphometric analysis of late gestation bovine placentomes from somatic nuclear transfer pregnancies complicated by hydrallantois. Biol Reprod 75(1):122-130.
24. Fletcher CJ, Roberts CT, Hartwich KM, Walker SK, McMillen IC (2007) Somatic cell nuclear transfer in the sheep induces placental defects that likely precede fetal demise. Reproduction 133(1):243-255.
25. De Sousa PA, et al. (2001) Evaluation of gestational deficiencies in cloned sheep fetuses and placentae. Biol Reprod 65(1):23-30.
26. Yang X, et al. (2007) Nuclear reprogramming of cloned embryos and its implications for therapeutic cloning. Nat Genet 39(3):295-302.
27. Heyman Y (2005) Nuclear transfer: A new tool for reproductive biotechnology in cattle. Reprod Nutr Dev 45(3):353-361.
28. Heyman Y, et al. (2002) Frequency and occurrence of late-gestation losses from cattle cloned embryos. Biol Reprod 66(1):6-13.
29. King GJ, Atkinson BA, Robertson HA (1981) Development of the intercaruncular areas during early gestation and establishment of the bovine placenta. J Reprod Fertil 61(2):469-474.
30. Smith CL, Eppig JT (2012) The Mammalian Phenotype Ontology as a unifying standard for experimental and high-throughput phenotyping data. Mamm Genome 23(9-10):653-668.
31. Yamakoshi S, et al. (2012) Expression of mesenchymal-related genes by the bovine trophectoderm following conceptus attachment to the endometrial epithelium. Reproduction 143(3):377-387.
32. Schiffmacher AT, Keefer CL (2013) CDX2 regulates multiple trophoblast genes in bovine trophectoderm CT-1 cells. Mol Reprod Dev 80(10):826-839.
33. Bazer FW, Spencer TE, Johnson GA (2009) Interferons and uterine receptivity. Semin Reprod Med 27(1):90-102.
34. Plump AS, et al. (2002) Slit1 and Slit2 cooperate to prevent premature midline crossing of retinal axons in the mouse visual system. Neuron 33(2):219-232.
35. Biase FH, et al. (2013) Changes in WNT signaling-related gene expression associated with development and cloning in bovine extra-embryonic and endometrial tissues during the peri-implantation period. Mol Reprod Dev 80(12):977-987.
36. Mansouri-Attia N, et al. (2009) Gene expression profiles of bovine caruncular and intercaruncular endometrium at implantation. Physiol Genomics 39(1):14-27.
37. Terness P, et al. (2007) Tolerance signaling molecules and pregnancy: IDO, galectins, and the renaissance of regulatory T cells. Am J Reprod Immunol 58(3):238-254.
38. Sedlmayr P, Blaschitz A, Stocker R (2014) The role of placental tryptophan catabolism. Front Immunol 5:230.
39. Wooding FB (1992) Current topic: The synepitheliochorial placenta of ruminants: Binucleate cell fusions and hormone production. Placenta 13(2):101-113.
40. Lee KY, DeMayo FJ (2004) Animal models of implantation. Reproduction 128(6):679-695.
41. Farin CE, et al. (1990) Expression of trophoblastic interferon genes in sheep and cattle. Biol Reprod 43(2):210-218.
42. Roberts RM, Cross JC, Leaman DW (1992) Interferons as hormones of pregnancy. Endocr Rev 13(3):432-452.
43. Imakawa K, et al. (2006) Regulation of conceptus adhesion by endometrial CXC chemokines during the implantation period in sheep. Mol Reprod Dev 73(7):850-858.
44. Spencer TE, Dunlap KA, Filant J (2012) Comparative developmental biology of the uterus: Insights into mechanisms and developmental disruption. Mol Cell Endocrinol 354(1-2):34-53.
45. Yanagimachi R (2002) Cloning: Experience from the mouse and other animals. Mol Cell Endocrinol 187(1-2):241-248.
46. Spencer TE, Bazer FW (2004) Uterine and placental factors regulating conceptus growth in domestic animals. J Anim Sci 82(E-Suppl):E4-13.
47. Kamentsky L, et al. (2011) Improved structure, function and compatibility for CellProfiler: Modular high-throughput image analysis software. Bioinformatics 27(8):1179-1180.
48. Yang QE, Giassetti MI, Ealy AD (2011) Fibroblast growth factors activate mitogen-activated protein kinase pathways to promote migration in ovine trophoblast cells. Reproduction 141(5):707-714.
49. Lee RSF, et al. (2004) Cloned cattle fetuses with the same nuclear genetics are more variable than contemporary half-siblings resulting from artificial insemination and exhibit fetal and placental growth deregulation even in the first trimester. Biol Reprod 70(1):1-11.
50. Vignon X, et al. (1998) Developmental potential of bovine embryos reconstructed from enucleated matured oocytes fused with cultured somatic cells. C R Acad Sci III 321(9):735-745.
51. Elsik CG, et al.; Bovine Genome Sequencing and Analysis Consortium (2009) The genome sequence of taurine cattle: A window to ruminant biology and evolution. Science 324(5926):522-528.
52. Trapnell C, Pachter L, Salzberg SL (2009) TopHat: Discovering splice junctions with RNA-Seq. Bioinformatics 25(9):1105-1111.
53. Trapnell C, et al. (2012) Differential gene and transcript expression analysis of RNA-seq experiments with TopHat and Cufflinks. Nat Protoc 7(3):562-578.
54. Kuhn RM, Haussler D, Kent WJ (2013) The UCSC genome browser and associated tools. Brief Bioinform 14(2):144-161.
55. Ihaka R, Gentleman R (2012) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. J Comput Graph Stat 5:299-314.
56. Gentleman RC, et al. (2004) Bioconductor: Open software development for computational biology and bioinformatics. Genome Biol 5(10):R80.
57. Reimers M, Carey VJ (2006) Bioconductor: An open source framework for bioinformatics and computational biology. Methods Enzymol 411:119-134.
58. Lawrence M, Gentleman R, Carey V (2009) rtracklayer: An R package for interfacing with genome browsers. Bioinformatics 25(14):1841-1842.
59. Morgan M, Pagés H, Obenchain V, Hayden N (2016) Rsamtools: Binary alignment (BAM), FASTA, variant call (BCF), and tabix file import. R package Version 1.26.1. Available at bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/html/Rsamtools.html. Accessed June 29, 2011.
60. Lawrence M, et al. (2013) Software for computing and annotating genomic ranges. PLOS Comput Biol 9(8):e1003118.
61. Robinson MD, McCarthy DJ, Smyth GK (2010) edgeR: A Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics 26(1):139-140.
62. Robinson MD, Oshlack A (2010) A scaling normalization method for differential expression analysis of RNA-seq data. Genome Biol 11(3):R25.
63. McCarthy DJ, Chen Y, Smyth GK (2012) Differential expression analysis of multifactor RNA-Seq experiments with respect to biological variation. Nucleic Acids Res 40(10):4288-4297.
64. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y (1995) Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc B 57:289-300.
65. Young MD, Wakefield MJ, Smyth GK, Oshlack A (2010) Gene ontology analysis for RNA-seq: Accounting for selection bias. Genome Biol 11(2):R14.
66. Ekins S, Nikolsky Y, Bugrim A, Kirillov E, Nikolskaya T (2007) Pathway mapping tools for analysis of high content data. Methods Mol Biol 356:319-350.