Digital Twin Data Modeling with AutomationML and a Communication Methodology for Data Exchange

IFAC-PapersOnLine

Volumn 49, Issue 30, 2016, Pages 12-17

  Schroeder, Greyce N ^a   Steinmetz, Charles ^a   Pereira, Carlos E ^a   Espindola, Danubia B ^b  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF RIO GRANDE DO SUL   (Brazil)

^b FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF RIO GRANDE   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Cyber Physical Systems (CPS); data exchange; Digital Twin; Industry 4.0; Internet of Things (IoT)

Indexed keywords

CYBER PHYSICAL SYSTEM; ELECTRONIC DATA INTERCHANGE; EMBEDDED SYSTEMS; INDUSTRY 4.0; INTERNET OF THINGS;

AUTOMATIONML; COMMUNICATION METHODOLOGY; CYBER-PHYSICAL SYSTEMS (CPS); INDUSTRIAL COMPONENTS; INTERNET OF THINGS (IOT); PRODUCT-SERVICE SYSTEMS;

DIGITAL TWIN;

EID: 85006391498     PISSN: None     EISSN: 24058963     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2016.11.115     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (28)

1. Baheti, R., Gill, H., Cyber-physical systems. The impact of control technology 12 (2011), 161–166.
2. Brock, D.L. (2001). The electronic product code (epc). Auto-ID Center White Paper MIT-AUTOID-WH-002.
3. Choi, S.S., Yoon, T.H., Noh, S.D., Xml-based neutral file and plm integrator for ppr information exchange between heterogeneous plm systems. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing 23:3 (2010), 216–228.
4. Di Cola, S., Tran, C., Lau, K.K., Celesti, A., Fazio, M., A heterogeneous approach for developing applications with fiware ges. Service Oriented and Cloud Computing, 2015, Springer, 65–79.
5. Glikson, A. (2011). Fi-ware: Core platform for future internet applications. In Proceedings of the 4th Annual International Conference on Systems and Storage.
6. Gomaa, H., Software modeling and design: UML, use cases, patterns, and software architectures, 2011, Cambridge University Press.
7. Grieves, M. (2014). Digital twin: Manufacturing excellence through virtual factory replication. URL http://www.apriso.com.
8. Group, I.W. et al. (2013). Securing the future of german manufacturing industry: Recommendations for implementing the strategic initiative industrie 4.0. Federal Ministry of Education and Research of German.
9. Hribernik, K., Wuest, T., Thoben, K.D., Towards product avatars representing middle-of-life information for improving design, development and manufacturing processes. Digital Product and Process Development Systems, 2013, Springer, 85–96.
10. Kiritsis, D., Closed-loop plm for intelligent products in the era of the internet of things. Computer-Aided Design 43:5 (2011), 479–501.
11. Lee, E.A., Cyber physical systems: Design challenges. Object Oriented Real-Time Distributed Computing (ISORC), 2008 11th IEEE International Symposium on, 2008, IEEE, 363–369.
12. Lüder, A., Hundt, L., Keibel, A., Description of manufacturing processes using automationml. Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation (ETFA), 2010 IEEE Conference on, 2010, IEEE, 1–8.
13. Mani, M., Lee, D., Muntz, R.R., Semantic data modeling using xml schemas. Conceptual ModelingER 2001, 2001, Springer, 149–163.
14. Meyer, G.G., Främling, K., Holmström, J., Intelligent products: A survey. Computers in industry 60:3 (2009), 137–148.
15. Papakonstantinou, Y., Garcia-Molina, H., Widom, J., Object exchange across heterogeneous information sources. Data Engineering, 1995. Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on, 1995, IEEE, 251–260.
16. PAS, I. (2006). 62424 specification for representation of process control engineering requests in p&i diagrams and for data exchange between p&id tools and pce-cae tools. VDE-Verlag GmbH, Berlin.
17. Patil, L., Dutta, D., Sriram, R., Ontology-based exchange of product data semantics. Automation Science and Engineering, IEEE Transactions on 2:3 (2005), 213–225.
18. Pratt, M.J., Introduction to iso 10303 the step standard for product data exchange. Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering 1:1 (2001), 102–103.
19. Razzaque, M.A., Milojevic-Jevric, M., Palade, A., Clarke, S., Middleware for internet of things: A survey. IEEE Internet of Things Journal 3:1 (2016), 70–95 doi:10.1109/JIOT.2015.2498900.
20. RÍOS, J., HERNÁNDEZ, J.C., OLIVA, M., and MASb, F. (2015). Product avatar as digital counterpart of a physical individual product: Literature review and implications in an aircraft. ary Lif System, 657.
21. Schleipen, M., Drath, R., Three-view-concept for modeling process or manufacturing plants with au-tomationml. Emerging Technologies & Factory Automation, 2009. ETFA 2009. IEEE Conference on, 2009, IEEE, 1–4.
22. Schleipen, M., Drath, R., and Sauer, O. (2008). The system-independent data exchange format caex for supporting an automatic configuration of a production monitoring and control system. In Industrial Electronics, 2008. ISIE 2008. IEEE International Symposium on, 1786–1791. IEEE.
23. Shafto, M., Conroy, M., Doyle, R., Glaessgen, E., Kemp, C., LeMoigne, J., and Wang, L. (2010). Draft modeling, simulation, information technology & processing roadmap. Technology Area, 11.
24. Shafto, M., Conroy, M., Doyle, R., Glaessgen, E., Kemp, C., LeMoigne, J., and Wang, L. (2012). Modeling, simulation, information technology & processing roadmap. National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
25. Sudarsan, R., Fenves, S.J., Sriram, R.D., Wang, F., A product information modeling framework for product lifecycle management. Computer-aided design 37:13 (2005), 1399–1411.
26. Völter, M., Stahl, T., Bettin, J., Haase, A., Helsen, S., Model-driven software development: technology, engineering, management, 2013, John Wiley & Sons.
27. Whyte, J., Bouchlaghem, N., Thorpe, A., McCaffer, R., From cad to virtual reality: modelling approaches, data exchange and interactive 3d building design tools. Automation in construction 10:1 (2000), 43–55.
28. Young, R., Gunendran, A., Cutting-Decelle, A., Gruninger, M., Manufacturing knowledge sharing in plm: a progression towards the use of heavy weight ontologies. International Journal of Production Research 45:7 (2007), 1505–1519.