Maintenance decision support for sustainable performance: problems and research directions at the crossroads of health management and eco-design

IFAC-PapersOnLine

Volumn 49, Issue 28, 2016, Pages 85-90

  Sénéchal, Olivier ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE VALENCIENNES   (France)

Author keywords

decision support; eco design; health management; Maintenance; prognostic; sustainability

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS; ECODESIGN; HEALTH; MAINTENANCE;

DECISION SUPPORTS; HEALTH MANAGEMENT; MAINTENANCE DECISIONS; PROGNOSTIC; PROGNOSTIC AND HEALTH MANAGEMENT; SOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL; SUSTAINABLE OPERATIONS; SUSTAINABLE PERFORMANCE;

SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

EID: 85006380265     PISSN: None     EISSN: 24058963     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2016.11.015     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (30)

1. Cauffriez, L., Willaeys D., Towards a predictive model for production line performance diagnosis, Control Engineering Practice 2005.
2. Al-Najar, B., Alsyouf I., Selecting the most efficient maintenance approach using fuzzy multiple criteria decision making. International Journal of Production Economics (11 April 2003): p.85–100.
3. Alsyouf, I., Measuring maintenance performance using a balanced scorecard approach. Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering 12:2 (2006), 133–149.
4. Ben, AliJ., Chebel-Morello, B., Malinowski, S., Saidi, L, Fnaiech, F., Accurate bearing remaining useful life prediction based on Weibull distribution and artificial neural network. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 56-57 (2015), 150–172.
5. Bertolini, M., Bevilacqua, M., A combined Goal programming- AHP approach to maintenance strategy selection problem. Reliability Engineering and system safety, 91, 2006.
6. Deloux, E., Castanier, B., Bérenguer, B., Maintenance policy for deteriorating system evolving in a stressful environment. Journal of Risk and Reliability -Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part O 222:4 (2008), 613–622.
7. Gunasekaran, A., Irani, Z., Papadopoulos, T., Modelling and analysis of sustainable operations management: certain investigations for research and applications. Journal of the Operational Research Society 65 (2014), 806–823.
8. rd International Conference on Through-life Engineering Services, 4th & 5th November 2014, Cranfield University, UK.
9. Karray, H., Contribution à la spécification et à l’élaboration d'une plateforme de maintenance orientée connaissances, thèse de doctorat de l'Université de Franche-Comté, Mars 2012.
10. Kumar, U., Galar, D., Parida, A., Stenström, C, Berges, L, Maintenance performance metrics: a state-of-the-art review. Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering 19:3 (2013), 233–277.
11. Larate, B., Evaluation dynamique et cumulative des impacts environnementaux dans le cadre d'une analyse de cycle de vie, Thèse de doctorat de l'université de Technologie de Troyes (UTT), 12 décembre 2013.
12. Le Mortellec, A., Clarhaut, J., Sallez, Y., Berger, T., Trentesaux, D., Embedded holonic fault diagnosis of complex transportation systems. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 26 (2013), 227-240. DOI: 10.1016/j.engappai.2012.09.008.
13. Le, T.T., Bérenguer C., Chatelain F., Hidden Markov Models for diagnostics and prognostics of systems under multiple deterioration modes, Safety and Reliability: Methodology and Applications – Nowakowski, et al. (Eds), © 2015 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-1-138-02681-0.
14. Mitra, F., Le Son, K, Barros, A., Levrat, E., Iung, B., Remaining useful life estimation based on stochastic deterioration models: A comparative study. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 112 (2013), 165–175.
15. Mather, D., The maintenance scorecard: Creating strategic advantage, 2005, Industrial Press, New York.
16. Medina-Oliva G., Weber P., Iung B., PRM_based Patterns for Knowledge formalisation of industrial systems to support Maintenance Strategies Assessment, Reliability Engineering System Safety; 116:38–56; 05/2013.
17. Monnin, M., Iung, B., Sénéchal, O., Regeneration Engineering for improving Technical Asset Life Cycle: an application to weapon systems availability assessment. International Journal of Strategic Engineering Asset Management 1:1 (2012), 61–90.
18. Parent, J., Cucuzzella, C., Revéret, J-P., Impact assessment in SLCA: sorting the sLCIA methods according to their outcomes. International Journal of Life Cycle Assess 15 (2010), 164–171.
19. Parida, A., Development of a Multi-criteria Hierarchical Framework for Maintenance Performance Measurement. Doctoral Thesis. Division of Operation and Maintenance Engineering, 2006, Luleå University of Technology.
20. Ruin, T., Levrat E., Iung B., Despujols A., Maintenance programs quantification to better control production systems: From expert knowledge modelling to Altarica Data Flow-based stochastic model for simulation, Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, may 2014.
21. Sablayrolles, C., Module d'enseignement sur la méthodologie de l'Analyse de Cycle de Vie, Université de Toulouse, Éditions des Ressources Pédagogiques Ouvertes de l'INP Toulouse, 2013.
22. Sadeghi, A., Manesh, R.A., The application of fuzzy group Analytic Network Process to selection of best maintenance strategy- A case study in Mobarakeh steel company, 2012, Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, Iran, 62.
23. Sénéchal, O., Pires S., R. Loures S., Trentesaux D., P. Santos E., Sustainable Performance: A Paradigm Inducing New Needs of Interoperability Between Maintenance and Scheduling Activities in Manufacturing, 5th International Workshop Advances in Cleaner Production, May 20th to 22th 2015, São Paulo Brazil, pp 234.
24. Shang, H., Bérenguer C., A Colored Petri Net model for railway track maintenance with two-level inspection, Safety and Reliability: Methodology and Applications – Nowakowski, et al. (Eds) © 2015 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-1-138-02681-0.
25. Triantaphyllou, E., Kovalerchuk, B., Mann, L., Knapp, GM., Determining the most important criteria in maintenance decision making. Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering 3:1 (1997), 16–24.
26. Voisin, A., Levrat, E., Cocheteux, P., Iung, B., Generic prognosis model for proactive maintenance decision support: application to pre-industrial e-maintenance test bed. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 21 (2010), 177–193.
27. Weber, P., Medina-Oliva, G., Iung, B., Overview on Bayesian networks applications for dependability, risk analysis and maintenance areas. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 25:4 (2012), 671–682.
28. World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED), Our Common Future, 1987, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 27 ISBN019282080X.
29. Youssouf, N.Mahamoud, Dehombreux, P, Pirlot, M., Robleh, H.E., Maintenance policy selection from a limited number of decision criteria. A case study: an application of the ELECTRE II method for selecting the best maintenance policy for hydraulic couplings. Accepté à la 11ième édition du congrès international de génie industriel (CIGI2015), 2015, Université de Laval, Québec.
30. Zwingelstein, G., Sûreté de fonctionnement des systèmes industriels complexes – Principaux concepts, Techniques de l'ingénieur, Juin 2009.