Progressive education and new governance in Denmark, Norway, and Sweden

The Nordic Education Model: 'A School for All' Encounters Neo-Liberal Policy

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 133-154

  Blossing, Ulf ^a   Imsen, Gunn ^b   Moos, Lejf ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

^b NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Norway)

^c AARHUS UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85006351606     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-7125-3_8     Document Type: Chapter

References (59)

1. Blossing, U., & Ekholm, M. (2008). A Central School Reform Programme in Sweden and the Local Response: Taking the Long Term View Works. Urban Education, 43(6), 624-652.
2. Bobbitt, F. (1924). How to make a curriculum. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
3. Carlgren, I. (2011a). Barnet och/eller kunskapen i centrum [The child and/or the knowledge in the center]. Retrieved from Skola och samhälle website: http://www.skolaochsamhalle.se/skola/ingrid-carlgren-barnet-ocheller-kunskapen-i-centrum/
4. Carlgren, I. (2011b). Behövs en ny progressiv pedagogisk rörelse? [Is there a need of a new progressive movement?] Retrieved from Skola och samhälle website: http://www.skolaochsamhalle.se/skola/ingrid-carlgren-behovs-en-ny-progressiv-pedagogisk-rorelse/
5. Carlgren, I. (2011c). Progressivismens många ansikten [The many faces of progressivism]. Retrieved from Skola och samhälle website: http://www.skolaochsamhalle.se/skola/ingrid-carlgren-progressivismens-manga-ansikten/
6. Central Advisory Council for Education (England). (1967). Children and their primary schools: Areport. London: HMSO.
7. Coninck-Smith, N. D. (1990). Klasselærerens historie 1875-1975 [The history of the class teacher 1875-1975]. Copenhagen: Danmarks Lærerhøjskole.
8. Dewey, J. (1900). The school and society. The child and the curriculum. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. (Reprinted in 1990)
9. Dewey, J. (1901). The situation as regards the course of study. Journal of Proceedings and Addresses of the Fortieth Annual Meeting of the National Education Association, 333-48.
10. Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy in Education. New York: Macmillan.
11. Dewey, J. (1937). Democracy and educational administration. In J. Ratner (Ed.), Education today. New York: G.P. Putman’s Sons.
12. Dewey, J. (1939). Creative democracy - The task before us. In John Dewey and the Promise of America. Progressive education booklet No. 14. Columbus: American Education Press.
13. Egidius, H. (2001). Skola och utbildning i historiskt och internationellt perspektiv [School and education in a historical and international perspective]. Stockholm: Natur &.Kultur.
14. Eisner, E. W. (1994). The educational imagination. On the design and evaluation of school programs (3rd ed.). New York: Macmillan.
15. Eisner, E. W. (1996). Curriculum Ideologies. In P. W. Jackson (Ed.), Handbook of research on curriculum (pp. 302-326). New York: Macmillan.
16. Ekholm, M. (2007). Användningen av tiden i skolan [The use of time in school]. In C. Einarsson (Ed.), Det enkla är det sköna: en vänbok till Kjell Granström. Linköping: Skapande vetande, Linköpings universitet.
17. Ekholm, M., & Kull, M. (1996). School climate and educational change: Stability and change in nine Swedish schools. European Educational Research Bulletin, 2(2), 3-11.
18. Granström, K. (2003). Arbetsformer och dynamik i klassrummet [Working Methods and Dynamics in the Class Room]. In S. Selander (Ed.), Kobran, nallen och majjen. Tradition och förnyelse i svensk skola och skolforskning (Vol. 12, pp. 223-244). Stockholm: Liber Distribution.
19. Grunnskolerådet. (1983). Oppfølging av Mønsterplanens intensjoner. Sluttrapport fra OMI- prosjektet [A follow-up og the Modell plan intentions. Final report from the OMI project]. OMI-rapport nr. 26.
20. Harrit, O., Kryger, N., Moos, L., Reinsholm, N., & Reisby, K. (1998). Klasselærere - tradition og fornyelse [The class-teacher - tradition and renewal]. Copenhagen: Danmarks Lærerhøjskole.
21. Haug, P. (2004). Resultat frå evalueringa av Reform 97 [Results from the evaluation of Reform 97]. Oslo: Noregs forskningsråd.
22. Hemberg, M., Eriksson, H., & Almlöf, D. (2012). Freinetrörelsen i Sverige - Kooperativet Arbetets Pedagogik/Index. Retrieved 20/5, 2012, from http://www.freinet.se/
23. Hodgson, J., et al., (2010). På vei fra læreplan til klasserom. Om lærernes fortolkning, planlegging og syn på LK 06 [From national curriculum plans to the classroom. On teachers’ interpretation, planning, and view on LK 06]. Nordlandsforskning, NF-rapport no. 3 2010.
24. Imsen, G. (2003). Skolemiljø, læringsmiljø og elevutbytte. En empirisk undersøkelse av grunnskolens 4., 7. og 10. trinn [School culture, learning environment, and students’ outcomes. An empirical investigation of grade 4., 7., and 10]. Trondheim: Tapir akademisk forlag.
25. Kaper, E. (1903/1923). Den daglige Undervisnings Form [The form of the daily education]. Copenhagen: Gyldendal.
26. Kerschensteiner, G. (1980). Arbejdsskolen [The labour school] (M. Husen, Trans.). Copenhagen: Nyt Nordisk Forlag. (Original work published 1928.)
27. Klette, K. (2003). Lærernes klasseromsarbeid: Interaksjons- og arbeidsformer i norske klasserom etter Reform 97 [Teachers’ classroom work: Interaction- and working methods in Norwegian classrooms after reform 97]. In K. Klette (Ed.), Klasserommets praksisformer etter Reform 97. Evaluering av reform 97. Oslo: Universitetet i Oslo, Pedagogisk forskningsinstitutt.
28. Kliebard, H. M. (1985). What happened to American Schooling in the first part of the twentieth century? In E. Eisner (Ed.), Learning and teaching the ways of knowing. Eighty-fourth yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part II (pp. 1-21). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
29. Kliebard, H. (1995). The struggle for the American curriculum 1893-1958 (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.
30. Krejsler, J. B., & Moos, L. (Eds.). (2008). Klasseledelse - magtkampe i praksis, pædagogik og politik [Class Leadership - Power struggles in practice, education and politics]. Frederikshavn: Dafolo.
31. Læreplanverket for Kunnskapsløftet. (2006). The national curriculum plan for the knowledge promotion. Oslo: Utdanningsdirektoratet.
32. Læreplanverket for den 10-årige grunnskolen. (1996). The national curriculum plan for the 10 year comprehensive school. Oslo: Det kongelige kirke-, utdannings- og forskningsdepartement. Nasjonalt læremiddelsenter.
33. Lindvall, K. (1999a). IT-spiralen i Malungs kommun [The spiral of the information technology in the municipality of Malung]. Karlstad: Utvärderingsinstitutet. Högskolan i Karlstad.
34. Lindvall, K. (1999b). Sprängkil för skolutveckling. IT-användning i Kils skolor vid seklets slut [The wedge for school development. Information technology use in Kil’s schools at the end of the century]. Karlstad: Karlstads universitet, Instituionen för utbildningsvetenskap.
35. Lundahl, C. (2009). Varför nationella prov? Framväxt, dilemman, möjligheter [Why national tests? Growth, dilemmas, possibilites]. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
36. Mønsterplan for grunnskolen. (1974). [Model plan for the comprehensive school]. Oslo: Aschehoug.
37. Mønsterplan for grunnskolen. (1987). [Model plan for the comprehensive school]. Oslo: Aschehoug.
38. Montessoriförbundet. (2012). Svenska Montessoriförbundet [The Swedich Association of Montessori]. Index Retrieved May20, 2012, from http://www.montessoriforbundet.se/
39. Nellemann, A. H. (1965). Den danske skoles historie [The history of the Danish school]. Copenhagen: Gjellerup.
40. Nørgaard, E. (1977). Lille barn, hvis er du? [Little child, who’s are you?]. Copenhagen: Gyldendal.
41. Øland, T. (2011). Progressiv pædagogik [Progressive pedagogic]. Frederikshavn: Dafolo.
42. Österlind, E. (1998). Disciplinering via frihet. Elevers planering av sitt eget arbete [To discipline via freedom. Students’ planning of learning assignments]. Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis.
43. Österlind, E. (2005). Eget arbete - en kameleont i klassrummet: perspektiv på ett arbetssätt från förskola till gymnasium [Students’ planning - A chameleon in the class room: perspective on a working method from pre-school to upper secondary school]. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
44. Pinar, W., et al. (1995). Understanding curriculum. An introduction to the study of historical and contemporary curriculum discourses. New York: Peter Lang.
45. Ribsskog, B. (1936a). Differensieringsspørsmålet i folkeskolen [The problem of differentiation in the folk school]. Det 20de århundre: Mot dag, 7(7), 296-299.
46. Ribsskog, B. (1936b). Standpunktprøver i regning. Norsk standard av Rostads standardprov i problemløsning. En undersøking av ca 16000 elever i folkeskolens 2-7. klasse [Achievement tests in calculus. Norwegian Standard of the Rostad standard tests in problem solving. An investigation of 16000 Folk school students in grade 2-7]. Oslo: Gyldendal Norsk Forlag.
47. Ribsskog, B., & All, A. (1936). Undervisningsplanene i folkeskolen. Et pedagogisk-psykologisk forarbeide til nye planer for orienteringsfagene [National curriculum plans for the folk school. An educational and psychological preparatory work for new plans in the social and natural sciences]. Oslo: Gyldendal Norsk Forlag.
48. Rønning, W. (2002). Likeverdig skole i praksis. Presentasjon av ei kartlegging [An equal school in practice. Presentation of a survey study]. Nordlandsforskning, rapport nr. 18.
49. Schacht, A. R. (1971). En praktisk mellemskole [A practical middle school]. Copenhagen: G.E.C. Gad.
50. Skolverket. (1993). Skolor och elevers utveckling. Den nationella utvärderingen av grundskolan våren 1992 [The development of schools and students]. Stockholm: Liber Distribution.
51. Skolverket. (1996). Elevers skolsituation och sociala utveckling, årskurs 9. Utvärdering av grundskolan 1995, UG 95 [Students’ school situation and social development, Grade 9]. Stockholm: Liber Distribution.
52. Skolverket. (2004). Den nationella utvärderingen av grundskolan 2003. Sammanfattande huvudrapport [The national evaluation of the comprehensive school 2003. Summary of main report]. Stockholm: Statens skolverk: Liber distribution.
53. Skolverket. (2009). Vad påverkar resultaten i svensk grundskola: kunskapsöversikt om betydelsen av olika faktorer [What affect the results in Swedish comprehensive school: Review of the importance of different factors]. Stockholm: Skolverket.
54. SOU (2007:28). Tydliga mål och kunskapkrav i grundskolan. Förslag till nytt mål och uppföljningssystem. Betänkande från utredningen om mål och uppföljning i grundskolan [Clear goals and knowledge demands in the comprehensive school. Proposal of new goal and evaluation system in the comprehensive school]. Stockholm: Utbildningsdepartementet.
55. SOU (2008:109). En hållbar lärarutbildning [A sustainable teacher education]. Stockholm: Utbildningsdepartementet.
56. SOU (2008:27). Framtidsvägen - en reformerad gymnasieskola. Betänkande från gymnasieutredningen [The future way - A reformed upper secondary school]. Stockholm: Utbildningsdepartementet.
57. Sugrue, C. (2010). Plowden: Progressive education - A 4-decade odyssey? Curriculum Inquiry, 40(1), 105-124.
58. Tyler, R. W. (1949). Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
59. Vaage, S. (Ed.). (2000). Utdanning til demokrati. Barnet, skolen og den nye pedagogikk. John Dewey i utvalg [Education for democracy. The child, school, and the new education. Selected readings from John Dewey]. Oslo: Abstrakt forlag.