Service to the profession: Definitions, scope, and value

Reference Librarian

Volumn 35, Issue 73, 2001, Pages 361-372

  Benefiel, Candace R ^a   Miller, Jeannie P ^a   Mosley, Pixey Anne ^a   Arant Kaspar, Wendi ^a  

^a TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Academic librarians; Faculty; Promotion; Service; Tenure

Indexed keywords

EID: 85006330843     PISSN: 02763877     EISSN: 15411117     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1300/J120v35n73_11     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Siggins, Jack and Naylor, Ronald P., eds. 1992. Academic Status for Librarians in ARL Libraries, Washington, DC: Association of Research Libraries, Office of Management Services. ARL Spec Kit 182.
2. Association of College and Research Libraries. Academic Status Committee. 1992. “Standards for Faculty Status for College and University Librarians,”. College and Research Libraries News, 53: 317 – 18. May.
3. Association of College and Research Libraries. Academic Status Committee. 1994. “Model Statement of Criteria and Procedures for Appointment, Promotion in Academic Rank, and Tenure for College and University Librarians,”. In Academic Status: Statements and Resources, 2nd ed., Edited by: Kroll, Susan. 11 – 24. Chicago: Association of College and Research Libraries.
4. Association of College and Research Libraries. Academic Status Committee. 1994. “Guidelines for Academic Status for College and University Libraries,”. In Academic Status: Statements and Resources, 2nd ed., Edited by: Kroll, Susan. 9 – 11. Chicago: Association of College and Research Libraries.
5. Cubberly, Carol W. 1996. Tenure and Promotion for Academic Librarians: A Guidebook with Advice and Vignettes, Jefferson, NC: McFarland.
6. DeBoer, Kee and Culotta, Wendy. 1987. “The Academic Librarian and Faculty Status in the 1980s: A Survey of the Literature,”. College and Research Libraries, 48: 215 – 23. May.
7. Grumling, Dennis Keith and Sheehy, Carolyn A. 1991. “An Exercise to Test Perception of Expectations for Tenure and Promotion,”. College and Research Libraries News, 52: 300 – 1. May.
8. Horenstein, Bonnie. 1993. “Job Satisfaction of Academic Librarians: An Examination of the Relationships Between Satisfaction, Faculty Status, and Participation,”. College and Research Libraries, 54: 255 – 69. May.
9. Indiana University Bloomington. Retrieved April 20, 1999 from the World Wide Web: Approved by the Library Faculty April 1998. Criteria For Librarian Promotions.
10. Krompart, Janet and DiFelice, Clara L. 1987. “A Review of Faculty Status Surveys, 1971–1984,”. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 13: 14 – 18. March.
11. Krompart, Janet. 1992. “Researching Faculty Status: A Selective Annotated Bibliography,”. College and Research Libraries, 53: 439 – 49. September.
12. Lowry, Charles Bryan. 1993. “The Status of Faculty Status for Academic Librarians: A Twenty-year Perspective,”. College and Research Libraries, 54: 163 – 72. March.
13. McGowan, Julie Johnson and Dow, Elizabeth H. 1995. “Faculty Status and Academic Librarianship: Transformation to a Clinical Model,”. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 21: 345 – 50. September.
14. Miller, Richard I. 1987. Evaluating Faculty for Promotion and Tenure, The Jossey-Bass Higher Education Series, San Francisco, London: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
15. Park, Elizabeth and Riggs, Robert. 1993. “Tenure and Promotion: A Study of Practices by Institutional Type,”. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 19: 72 – 77. May.
16. Park, Elizabeth and Riggs, Robert. 1991. “Status of the Profession: A 1989 National Survey of Tenure and Promotion Policies for Academic Librarians,”. College and Research Libraries, 52: 275 – 89. May.
17. University of Colorado. February 8 1983. University of Colorado Administrative Policy Statement: Implementation of Tenure Policies for Librarians February 8.
18. University of Illinois at Urbana -Champaign. Retrieved April 20, 1999 from the World Wide Web: Approved and adopted by the University of Illinois Library Faculty at the June 17, 1994 meeting. Statement on Promotion, Tenure, Appointments to the Library Faculty at the University of Illinois at Urbana -Champaign. Statement on Promotion, Tenure, Appointments to the Library Faculty at the University of Illinois at Urbana -Champaign.
19. University of Oregon. October 1996. OU Library Policy on: Faculty Evaluation Procedures October, Retrieved April 26, 1999.
20. University of Tennessee -Knoxville. 1995. Promotion and Tenure Criteria: Guidelines for Library Faculty Retrieved April 20, 1999.
21. Werrell, Emily L. and Sullivan, Laura A. 1987. “Faculty Status for Academic Librarians: A Review of the Literature,”. College and Research Libraries, 48: 95 – 103. March.