Reward modulates perception in binocular rivalry

Journal of Vision

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 1-13

  Marx, Svenja ^a   Einhäuser, Wolfgang ^a  

^a PHILIPPS UNIVERSITY MARBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Attention; Binocular rivalry; Decision making; Perception; Reward

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ATTENTION; BINOCULAR VISION; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PHYSIOLOGY; REWARD; VISION; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; ATTENTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; REWARD; VISION DISPARITY; VISION, BINOCULAR; VISUAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 85006324044     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15347362     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/15.1.11     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Alpers, G. W., Ruhleder, M., Walz, N., Mühlberger, A., & Pauli, P. (2005). Binocular rivalry between emotional and neutral stimuli: A validation using fear conditioning and EEG. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 57(1), 25-32, doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2005.01.008.
2. Baldassi, S., & Simoncini, C. (2011). Reward sharpens orientation coding independently of attention. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 5, 13, doi:10.3389/fnins.2011.00013.
3. Brainard, D. H. (1997). The psychophysics toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10, 433-436, doi:10.1163/ 156856897X00357.
4. Brascamp, J. W., & Blake, R. (2012). Inattention abolishes binocular rivalry: Perceptual evidence. Psychological Science, 23(10), 1159-1167, doi:10.1177/0956797612440100.
5. Breese, B. B. (1899). On inhibition. Psychological Review, 3(1), 1-65, doi:10.1037/h0092990.
6. Bülthoff, H. H., & Yuille, A. L. (1996). A Bayesian framework for the integration of visual modules. In T. Inui & J. L. McClelland (Eds.), Attention and performance XVI: Information integration in perception and communication (pp. 49-70). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
7. Carrasco, M., Ling, S., & Read, S. (2004). Attention alters appearance. Nature Neuroscience, 7(3), 308- 313, doi:10.1038/nn1194.
8. Cornelissen, F. W., Peters, E. M., & Palmer, J. (2002). The Eyelink toolbox: Eye tracking with Matlab and the psychophysics toolbox. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 34, 613-617, doi:10.3758/BF03195489.
9. Deco, G., Rolls, E. T., Albantakis, L., & Romo, R. (2013). Brain mechanisms for perceptual and reward-related decision-making. Progress in Neurobiology, 103, 194-213, doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2012.01.010.
10. Della Libera, C., & Chelazzi, L. (2009). Learning to attend and to ignore is a matter of gains and losses. Psychological Science, 20(6), 778-784, doi:10.1111/ j.1467-9280.2009.02360.x.
11. Einhäuser, W., Stout, J., Koch, C., & Carter, O. (2008). Pupil dilation reflects perceptual selection and predicts subsequent stability in perceptual rivalry. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 105(5), 1704-1709, doi:10.1073/pnas.0707727105.
12. Fahle, M. W., Stemmler, T., & Spang, K. M. (2011). How much of the ''unconscious'' is just prethreshold? Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 5, 120, doi:10.3389/fnhum.2011.00120.
13. Failing, M. F., & Theeuwes, J. (2014). Exogenous visual orienting by reward. Journal of Vision, 14(5): 6, 1-9, http://www.journalofvision.org/content/14/ 5/6, doi:10.1167/14.5.6. [PubMed] [Article]
14. Frässle, S., Sommer, J., Jansen, A., Naber, M., & Einhäuser, W. (2014). Binocular rivalry: Frontal activity relates to introspection and action but not to perception. Journal of Neuroscience, 34(5), 1738- 1747, doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4403-13.2014.
15. Freeman, W. T. (1994). The generic viewpoint assumption in a framework for visual perception. Nature, 368(6471), 542-545, doi:10.1038/368542a0.
16. Fries, P., Roelfsema, P. R., Engel, A. K., König, P., & Singer, W. (1997). Synchronization of oscillatory responses in visual cortex correlates with perception in interocular rivalry. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 94(23), 12699-12704.
17. Glimcher, P. W., & Rustichini, A. (2004). Neuroeconomics: The consilience of brain and decision. Science, 306(5695), 447-452, doi:10.1126/science.1102566.
18. Hickey, C., Chelazzi, L., & Theeuwes, J. (2010). Reward changes salience in human vision via the anterior cingulate. Journal of Neuroscience, 30(33), 11096-11103, doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1026-10.2010.
19. Hickey, C., & van Zoest, W. (2012). Reward creates oculomotor salience. Current Biology, 22(7), R219- R220, doi:10.1016/j.cub.2012.02.007.
20. James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology. New York: Holt.
21. Kersten, D., Mamassian, P., & Yuille, A. (2004). Object perception as Bayesian inference. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 271-304, doi:10.1146/ annurev.psych.55.090902.142005.
22. Lee, D. K., Koch, C., & Braun, J. (1999). Attentional capacity is undifferentiated: Concurrent discrimination of form, color, and motion. Perception & Psychophysics, 61(7), 1241-1255, doi:10.3758/ BF03206177.
23. Lee, J., & Shomstein, S. (2013). The differential effects of reward on space-and object-based attentional allocation. Journal of Neuroscience, 33(26), 10625- 10633, doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5575-12.2013.
24. Lee, S.-H., Blake, R., & Heeger, D. J. (2007). Hierarchy of cortical responses underlying binocular rivalry. Nature Neuroscience, 10(8), 1048-1054, doi:10.1038/nn1939.
25. Leopold, D. A., & Logothetis, N. K. (1999). Multistable phenomena: Changing views in perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3(7), 254-264, doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(99)01332-7.
26. Logothetis, N. K., & Schall, J. D. (1990). Binocular motion rivalry in macaque monkeys: Eye dominance and tracking eye movements. Vision Research, 30(10), 1409-1419, doi:10.1016/ 0042-6989(90)90022-D.
27. Meng, M., & Tong, F. (2004). Can attention selectively bias bistable perception? Differences between binocular rivalry and ambiguous figures. Journal of Vision, 4(7):2, 539-551, http://www. journalofvision.org/content/4/7/2, doi:10.1167/4.7.2. [PubMed] [Article]
28. Naber, M., Frässle, S., & Einhäuser, W. (2011). Perceptual rivalry: Reflexes reveal the gradual nature of visual awareness. PloS One, 6(6), e20910, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0020910.
29. Newsome, W. T., & Pare, E. B. (1988). A selective impairment of motion perception following lesions of the middle temporal visual area (MT). Journal of Neuroscience, 8(6), 2201-2211.
30. Ooi, T. L., & He, Z. J. (1999). Binocular rivalry and visual awareness: The role of attention. Perception, 28(5), 551-574, doi:10.1068/p2923.
31. Paffen, C. L. E., Alais, D., & Verstraten, F. (2006). Attention speeds binocular rivalry. Psychological Science, 17(9), 752-756, doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01777.x.
32. Paffen, C. L. E., & van der Stigchel, S. (2010). Shifting spatial attention makes you flip: Exogenous visual attention triggers perceptual alternations during binocular rivalry. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72(5), 1237-1243, doi:10.3758/APP.72.5.1237.
33. Pastukhov, A., & Braun, J. (2007). Perceptual reversals need no prompting by attention. Journal of Vision, 7(10):5, 1-17, http://www.journalofvision.org/ content/7/10/5, doi:10.1167/7.10.5. [PubMed] [Article]
34. Pastukhov, A., Fischer, L., & Braun, J. (2009). Visual attention is a single, integrated resource. Vision Research, 49(10), 1166-1173, doi:10.1016/j.visres.2008.04.011.
35. Pavlov, I. P. (1927). Conditioned reflexes: An investigation of the physiological activity of the cerebral cortex. London: Oxford University Press.
36. Pelli, D. G. (1997). The video toolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision, 10, 437-442, doi:10.1163/ 156856897X00366.
37. Preuschoff, K., Bossaerts, P., & Quartz, S. R. (2006). Neural differentiation of expected reward and risk in human subcortical structures. Neuron, 51(3), 381-390, doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2006.06.024.
38. Rescorla, R. A., & Wagner, A. R. (1972). A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. Classical Conditioning II: Current Research and Theory, 2, 64-99.
39. Rothkirch, M., Schmack, K., Deserno, L., Darmohray, D., & Sterzer, P. (2013). Attentional modulation of reward processing in the human brain. Human Brain Mapping, 35(7), 3036-3051, doi:10.1002/ hbm.22383.
40. Schultz, W., Apicella, P., Scarnati, E., & Ljungberg, T. (1992). Neuronal activity in monkey ventral striatum related to the expectation of reward. Journal of Neuroscience, 12(12), 4595-4610.
41. Seitz, A. R., Kim, D., & Watanabe, T. (2009). Rewards evoke learning of unconsciously processed visual stimuli in adult humans. Neuron, 61(5), 700-707, doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2009.01.016.
42. Skinner, B. F. (1938). The behavior of organisms: An experimental analysis. New York: Appleton-Century- Crofts.
43. Stănişor, L., van der Togt, C., Pennartz, C. M. A., & Roelfsema, P. R. (2013). A unified selection signal for attention and reward in primary visual cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 110(22), 9136-9141, doi:10.1073/pnas.1300117110.
44. Tong, F., Nakayama, K., Vaughan, J. T., & Kanwisher, N. (1998). Binocular rivalry and visual awareness in human extrastriate cortex. Neuron, 21(4), 753-759, doi:10.1016/ S0896-6273(00)80592-9.
45. Van Ee, R., van Dam, L. C. J., & Brouwer, G. J. (2005). Voluntary control and the dynamics of perceptual bi-stability. Vision Research, 45(1), 41-55, doi:10.1016/j.visres.2004.07.030.
46. Von Helmholtz, H. (1867). Handbuch der physiologischen Optik. Leipzig, Germany: Voss.
47. Watkins, C. J. C. H., & Dayan, P. (1992). Q-learning. Machine Learning, 8(3-4), 279-292, doi:10.1007/ BF00992698.
48. Zhang, P., Jamison, K., Engel, S., He, B., & He, S. (2011). Binocular rivalry requires visual attention. Neuron, 71(2), 362-369, doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2011.05.035.