The ETH field phenotyping platform FIP: A cable-suspended multi-sensor system

Functional Plant Biology

Volumn 44, Issue 1, 2017, Pages 154-168

  Kirchgessner, Norbert ^a   Liebisch, Frank ^a   Yu, Kang ^a   Pfeifer, Johannes ^a   Friedli, Michael ^a   Hund, Andreas ^a   Walter, Achim ^a  

^a ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

crop; growth; image analysis

Indexed keywords

CANOPY ARCHITECTURE; CORRELATION; CROP PLANT; ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE RESOLUTION; PHENOTYPE; SENSOR;

GLYCINE MAX; TRITICUM AESTIVUM; ZEA MAYS;

EID: 85006255885     PISSN: 14454408     EISSN: 14454416     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1071/FP16165     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Andrade-Sanchez P, Gore MA, Heun JT, Thorp KR, Carmo-Silva AE, French AN, Salvucci ME, White JW (2014) Development and evaluation of a field-based high-throughput phenotyping platform. Functional Plant Biology 41, 68-79. doi:10.1071/FP13126
2. Araus JL, Cairns JE (2014) Field high-throughput phenotyping: the new crop breeding frontier. Trends in Plant Science 19, 52-61. doi:10.1016/ j.tplants.2013.09.008
3. Behmann J, Steinrucken J, Plumer L (2014) Detection of early plant stress responses in hyperspectral images. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 93, 98-111. doi:10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2014.03.016
4. Busemeyer L, Mentrup D, Moller K, Wunder E, Alheit K, Hahn V, Maurer HP, Reif JC, Wurschum T, Muller J, Rahe F, Ruckelshausen A (2013) BreedVision-A multi-sensor platform for non-destructive field-based phenotyping in plant breeding. Sensors 13, 2830-2847. doi:10.3390/ s130302830
5. Chapman S, Merz T, Chan A, Jackway P, Hrabar S, Dreccer M, Holland E, Zheng B, Ling T, Jimenez-Berni J (2014) Pheno-Copter: a low-altitude, autonomous remote-sensing robotic helicopter for high-throughput fieldbased phenotyping. Agronomy 4, 279-301. doi:10.3390/agronomy 4020279
6. Chen D, Neumann K, Friedel S, Kilian B, Chen M, Altmann T, Klukas C (2014) Dissecting the phenotypic components of crop plant growth and drought responses based on high-throughput image analysis. The Plant Cell 26, 4636-4655. doi:10.1105/tpc.114.129601
7. Christopher JT, Veyradier M, Borrell AK, Harvey G, Fletcher S, Chenu K (2014) Phenotyping novel stay-green traits to capture genetic variation in senescence dynamics. Functional Plant Biology 41, 1035-1048. doi:10.1071/FP14052
8. Deepfield Robotics (2015) BoniRob: adaptable multi-purpose robotic platform. Available at http://www.deepfield-robotics.com/de/BoniRob. html. [Verified 16 September 2016]
9. Deery D, Jimenez-Berni J, Jones H, Sirault X, Furbank R (2014) Proximal remote sensing buggies and potential applications for field-based phenotyping. Agronomy 4, 349-379. doi:10.3390/agronomy4030349
10. Fiorani F, Schurr U (2013) Future scenarios for plant phenotyping. Annual Review of Plant Biology 64, 267-291. doi:10.1146/annurevarplant-050312-120137
11. Foulkes MJ, Sylvester-Bradley R, Worland AJ, Snape JW (2004) Effects of a photoperiod-response gene Ppd-D1 on yield potential and drought resistance in UK winter wheat. Euphytica 135, 63-73. doi:10.1023/B: EUPH.0000009542.06773.13
12. Friedli M, Kirchgessner N, Grieder C, Liebisch F, Mannale M, Walter A (2016) Terrestrial 3D laser scanning to track the increase in canopy height of both monocot and dicot crop species under field conditions. Plant Methods 12, 9. doi:10.1186/s13007-016-0109-7
13. Furbank RT, Tester M (2011) Phenomics-technologies to relieve the phenotyping bottleneck. Trends in Plant Science 16, 635-644. doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2011.09.005
14. Furbank RT, von Caemmerer S, Sheehy J, Edwards G (2009) C4 rice: a challenge for plant phenomics. Functional Plant Biology 36, 845-856. doi:10.1071/FP09185
15. Granier C, Aguirrezabal L, Chenu K, Cookson SJ, Dauzat M, Hamard P, Thioux JJ, Rolland G, Bouchier-Combaud S, Lebaudy A, Muller B, Simonneau T, Tardieu F (2006) PHENOPSIS, an automated platform for reproducible phenotyping of plant responses to soil water deficit in Arabidopsis thaliana permitted the identification of an accession with low sensitivity to soil water deficit. New Phytologist 169, 623-635. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01609.x
16. Grieder C, Hund A, Walter A (2015) Image based phenotyping during winter: a powerful tool to assess wheat genetic variation in growth response to temperature. Functional Plant Biology 42, 387-396. doi:10.1071/FP14226
17. Guo W, Rage UK, Ninomiya S (2013) Illumination invariant segmentation of vegetation for time series wheat images based on decision tree model. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 96, 58-66. doi:10.1016/ j.compag.2013.04.010
18. Haboudane D, Miller JR, Pattey E, Zarco-Tejada PJ, Strachan IB (2004) Hyperspectral vegetation indices and novel algorithms for predicting green LAI of crop canopies: modeling and validation in the context of precision agriculture. Remote Sensing of Environment 90, 337-352. doi:10.1016/j.rse.2003.12.013
19. Hamza MA, Anderson WK (2005) Soil compaction in cropping systems-A review of the nature, causes and possible solutions. Soil &Tillage Research 82, 121-145. doi:10.1016/j.still.2004.08.009
20. Hatfield JL, Prueger JH (2010) Value of using different vegetative indices to quantify agricultural crop characteristics at different growth stages under varying management practices. Remote Sensing 2, 562-578. doi:10.3390/rs2020562
21. Jerbi T, Wuyts N, Cane MA, Faux PF, Draye X (2015) High resolution imaging of maize (Zea mays) leaf temperature in the field: the key role of the regions of interest. Functional Plant Biology 42, 858-864. doi:10.1071/FP15024
22. Jones HG, Serraj R, Loveys BR, Xiong LZ, Wheaton A, Price AH (2009) Thermal infrared imaging of crop canopies for the remote diagnosis and quantification of plant responses to water stress in the field. Functional Plant Biology 36, 978-989. doi:10.1071/FP09123
23. Junker A, Muraya MM, Weigelt-Fischer K, Arana-Ceballos F, Klukas C, Melchinger AE, Meyer RC, Riewe D, Altmann T (2015) Optimizing experimental procedures for quantitative evaluation of crop plant performance in high throughput phenotyping systems. Frontiers in Plant Science 5, 770. doi:10.3389/fpls.2014.00770
24. Khanna R, Möller M, Pfeifer J, Liebisch F, Walter A, Siegwart R (2015) 'Beyond point clouds-3D mapping and field parameter measurements using UAVs, emerging technologies and factory automation (ETFA). 2015IEEE20th conference'. Available at http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/ielx7/ 7295717/7301399/07301583.pdf?tp=andarnumber=7301583&isnumber= 7301399 [Verified 16 September 2016]
25. Kipp S, Mistele B, Baresel P, Schmidhalter U (2014a) High-throughput phenotyping early plant vigour of winter wheat. European Journal of Agronomy 52, 271-278. doi:10.1016/j.eja.2013.08.009
26. Kipp S, Mistele B, Schmidhalter U (2014b) Identification of stay-green and early senescence phenotypes in high-yielding winter wheat, and their relationship to grain yield and grain protein concentration using high-throughput phenotyping techniques. Functional Plant Biology 41, 227. doi:10.1071/FP13221
27. LemnaTec GmbH (2015) Infield Phenotyping by LemnaTec. Available at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wj-U0QH5J-M [Verified 16 September 2016]
28. Liebisch F, Küng G, Damm A, Walter A (2014) Characterization of crop vitality and resource use efficiency by means of combining imaging spectroscopy based plant traits. In 'IEEE Conference: Workshop on hyperspectral image and signal processing : evolution in remote sensing (WHISPERS), Lausanne, Switzerland. Vol. 6'. Available at https://www. researchgate.net/publication/263887298-Characterization-of-Crop- Vitality-and-Resource-Use-Efficiency-By-Means-of-Combining- Imaging-Spectroscopy-Based-Plant-Traits [Verified 16 September 2016]
29. Liebisch F, Kirchgessner N, Schneider D, Walter A, Hund A (2015) Remote, aerial phenotyping of maize traits with a mobile multi-sensor approach. Plant Methods 11, 9. doi:10.1186/s13007-015-0048-8
30. Mahlein AK, Steiner U, Hillnhutter C, Dehne HW, Oerke EC (2012) Hyperspectral imaging for small-scale analysis of symptoms caused by different sugar beet diseases. Plant Methods 8, 3. doi:10.1186/ 1746-4811-8-3
31. Mulla DJ (2013) Twenty-five years of remote sensing in precision agriculture: key advances and remaining knowledge gaps. Biosystems Engineering 114, 358-371. doi:10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2012.08.009
32. Munns R, James RA, Sirault XR, Furbank RT, Jones HG (2010) New phenotyping methods for screening wheat and barley for beneficial responses to water deficit. Journal of Experimental Botany 61, 3499-3507. doi:10.1093/jxb/erq199
33. Parent B, Shahinnia F, Maphosa L, Berger B, Rabie H, Chalmers K, Kovalchuk A, Langridge P, Fleury D (2015) Combining field performance with controlled environment plant imaging to identify the genetic control of growth and transpiration underlying yield response to water-deficit stress in wheat. Journal of Experimental Botany 66, 5481-5492. doi:10.1093/jxb/erv320
34. Peter R, Eschholz TW, Stamp P, Liedgens M (2009) Swiss Flint maize landraces-A rich pool of variability for early vigour in cool environments. Field Crops Research 110, 157-166. doi:10.1016/j.fcr. 2008.07.015
35. PHENOSPEX (2014) FieldScan ultra high throughput field phenotyping platform. Available at https://phenospex.com/products/plant-phenotyping/ fieldscan-high-throughput-field-phenotpying-platform/ [Verified 16 September 2016]
36. Pimstein A, Eitel JUH, Long DS, Mufradi I, Karnieli A, Bonfil DJ (2009) A spectral index to monitor the head-emergence of wheat in semi-arid conditions. Field Crops Research 111, 218-225. doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2008. 12.009
37. R Development Core Team (2015) 'R: A language and environment for statistical computing.' (R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria)
38. Reymond M, Muller B, Leonardi A, Charcosset A, Tardieu F (2003) Combining quantitative trait loci analysis and an ecophysiological model to analyze the genetic variability of the responses of maize leaf growth to temperature and water deficit. Plant Physiology 131, 664-675. doi:10.1104/pp.013839
39. Reynolds M, Foulkes MJ, Slafer GA, Berry P, Parry MAJ, Snape JW, Angus WJ (2009) Raising yield potential in wheat. Journal of Experimental Botany 60, 1899-1918. doi:10.1093/jxb/erp016
40. Roy DP, Zhang HK, Ju J, Gomez-Dans JL, Lewis PE, Schaaf CB, Sun Q, Li J, Huang H, Kovalskyy V (2016) A general method to normalize Landsat reflectance data to nadir BRDF adjusted reflectance. Remote Sensing of Environment 176, 255-271. doi:10.1016/j.rse.2016.01.023
41. Sankaran S, Khot LR, Espinoza CZ, Jarolmasjed S, Sathuvalli VR, Vandemark GJ, Miklas PN, Carter AH, Pumphrey MO, Knowles NR, Payek MJ (2015) Low-altitude, high-resolution aerial imaging systems for row and field crop phenotyping: a review. European Journal of Agronomy 70, 112-123. doi:10.1016/j.eja.2015.07.004
42. Svensgaard J, Roitsch T, Christensen S (2014) Development of a mobile multispectral imaging platform for precise field phenotyping. Agronomy 4, 322. doi:10.3390/agronomy4030322
43. Tester M, Langridge P (2010) Breeding technologies to increase crop production in a changing world. Science 327, 818-822. doi:10.1126/ science.1183700
44. University of Arizona (2015) Precision agriculture. Maricopa Agricultural Center. Available at http://cals-mac.arizona.edu/precision-agriculture. [Verified 16 September 2016]
45. Ustin SL, Valko PG, Kefauver SC, Santos MJ, Zimpfer JF, Smith SD (2009) Remote sensing of biological soil crust under simulated climate change manipulations in the Mojave Desert. Remote Sensing of Environment 113, 317-328. doi:10.1016/j.rse.2008.09.013
46. van Ginkel M, Reynolds MP, Trethowan R, Hernandez E (2008) Complementing the breeder's eye with canopy temperature measurements. In 'International symposium on wheat yield potential: challenges to international wheat breeding'. (Eds MP Reynolds, J Pietragalla, HJ Braun) pp. 134-135. (CIMMYT: Edo. de México, Mexico)
47. Wahabzada M, Mahlein AK, Bauckhage C, Steiner U, Oerke EC, Kersting K (2016) Plant phenotyping using probabilistic topic models: uncovering the hyperspectral language of plants. Scientific Reports 6, 22482. doi:10.1038/srep22482
48. Walter A, Scharr H, Gilmer F, Zierer R, Nagel KA, ErnstM(2007) Dynamics of seedling growth acclimation towards altered light conditions can be quantified via GROWSCREEN: a setup and procedure designed for rapid optical phenotyping of different plant species. New Phytologist 174, doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.02002.x
49. Wang CN, Hsu HC, Wang CC, Lee TK, Kuo YF (2015) Quantifying floral shape variation in 3D using microcomputed tomography: a case study of a hybrid line between actinomorphic and zygomorphic flowers. Frontiers in Plant Science 6, 724. doi:10.3389/fpls.2015.00724
50. Watts AC, Ambrosia VG, Hinkley EA (2012) Unmanned aircraft systems in remote sensing and scientific research: classification and considerations of use. Remote Sensing 4, 1671-1692. doi:10.3390/ rs4061671
51. White JW, ConleyMM(2013) A flexible, low-cost cart for proximal sensing. Crop Science 53, 1646-1649. doi:10.2135/cropsci2013.01.0054
52. White JW, Andrade-Sanchez P, Gore MA, Bronson KF, Coffelt TA, Conley MM, Feldmann KA, French AN, Heun JT, Hunsaker DJ, Jenks MA, Kimball BA, Roth RL, Strand RJ, Thorp KR, Wall GW, Wang G (2012) Field-based phenomics for plant genetics research. Field Crops Research 133, 101-112. doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2012.04.003
53. Zarco-Tejada PJ, Gonzalez-Dugo V, Williams LE, Suarez L, Berni JAJ, Goldhamer D, Fereres E (2013) A PRI-based water stress index combining structural and chlorophyll effects: assessment using diurnal narrow-band airborne imagery and the CWSI thermal index. Remote Sensing of Environment 138, 38-50. doi:10.1016/j.rse.2013.07.024
54. Zhang CH, Kovacs JM (2012) The application of small unmanned aerial systems for precision agriculture: a review. Precision Agriculture 13, 693-712. doi:10.1007/s11119-012-9274-5
55. Zheng BY, Biddulph B, Li DR, Kuchel H, Chapman S (2013) Quantification of the effects of VRN1 and Ppd-D1 to predict spring wheat (Triticum aestivum) heading time across diverse environments. Journal of Experimental Botany 64, 3747-3761. doi:10.1093/jxb/ert209