Shared decision making in patients with low risk chest pain: Prospective randomized pragmatic trial

BMJ (Online)

Volumn 355, Issue , 2016, Pages

  Hess, Erik P ^a   Hollander, Judd E ^c   Schaffer, Jason T ^d   Kline, Jeffrey A ^d   Torres, Carlos A ^e   Diercks, Deborah B ^f   Jones, Russell ^g   Owen, Kelly P ^g   Meisel, Zachary F ^h   Demers, Michel ⁱ   LeBlanc, Annie ^b   Shah, Nilay D ^b   Inselman, Jonathan ^b   Herrin, Jeph ^k   Castaneda Guarderas, Ana ^a,i,j   Montori, Victor M ^b  

^a Mayo Clinic   (United States)

^b MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

^c THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^g UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^h UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

ⁱ Yale University School of Medicine ^*  (United States)

^j YALE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^k Health Research and Educational Trust   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME; ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; LOW RISK PATIENT; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTICENTER STUDY; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PATIENT DECISION MAKING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SHARED DECISION MAKING; THORAX PAIN; WEB BROWSER; AFTERCARE; AMBULATORY CARE; CHEST PAIN; COMPLICATION; CONFLICT; DECISION MAKING; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HOSPITAL EMERGENCY SERVICE; HOSPITAL SUBDIVISIONS AND COMPONENTS; HOSPITALIZATION; MIDDLE AGED; MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; OBSERVATION; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PATIENT SATISFACTION; RISK ASSESSMENT; TRUST;

ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME; ADULT; AFTERCARE; AMBULATORY CARE; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; CHEST PAIN; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; CONFLICT (PSYCHOLOGY); DECISION MAKING; DECISION SUPPORT TECHNIQUES; EMERGENCY SERVICE, HOSPITAL; FEMALE; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HOSPITAL UNITS; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; OBSERVATION; PATIENT ACCEPTANCE OF HEALTH CARE; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PATIENT SATISFACTION; RISK ASSESSMENT; TRUST;

EID: 85006131982     PISSN: 09598146     EISSN: 17561833     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.i6165     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Niska R, Bhuiya F, Xu J. National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 2007 emergency department summary[published Online First: 2010/08/24]. Natl Health Stat Report 2010;(26):1-31
2. Goodacre S, Cross E, Arnold J, Angelini K, Capewell S, Nicholl J. The health care burden of acute chest pain[published Online First: 2005/01/20]. Heart 2005;91:229-30. doi:10.1136/hrt.2003.027599
3. Bhuiya FA, Pitts SR, McCaig LF. Emergency department visits for chest pain and abdominal pain: United States, 1999-2008[published Online First: 2010/09/22]. NCHS Data Brief 2010;(43):1-8
4. Graff LG, Chern CH, Radford M. Emergency physicians acute coronary syndrome testing threshold and diagnostic performance: acute coronary syndrome critical pathway with return visit feedback[published Online First: 2014/07/26]. Crit Pathw Cardiol 2014;13:99-103. doi:10.1097/HPC.0000000000000021
5. Than M, Herbert M, Flaws D, et al. What is an acceptable risk of major adverse cardiac event in chest pain patients soon after discharge from the Emergency Department?: a clinical survey[published Online First: 2012/10/23]. Int J Cardiol 2013;166:752-4. doi:10.1016/j. ijcard.2012.09.171
6. Nasrallah N, Steiner H, Hasin Y. The challenge of chest pain in the emergency room: now and the future. Eur Heart J 2011;32:656
7. Ladapo JA, Blecker S, Douglas PS. Physician decision making and trends in the use of cardiac stress testing in the United States: an analysis of repeated cross-sectional data[published Online First: 2014/10/07]. Ann Intern Med 2014;161:482-90. doi:10.7326/M14-0296
8. Kline JA, Johnson CL, Pollack CV Jr, et al. Pretest probability assessment derived from attribute matching. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2005;5:26. doi:10.1186/1472-6947-5-26
9. Mitchell AM, Garvey JL, Chandra A, Diercks D, Pollack CV, Kline JA. Prospective multicenter study of quantitative pretest probability assessment to exclude acute coronary syndrome for patients evaluated in emergency department chest pain units. Ann Emerg Med 2006;47:447. doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2005.10.013
10. Pierce MA, Hess EP, Kline JA, et al. The Chest Pain Choice trial: a pilot randomized trial of a decision aid for patients with chest pain in the emergency department[published Online First: 2010/05/19]. Trials 2010;11:57. doi:10.1186/1745-6215-11-57
11. Hess EP, Knoedler MA, Shah ND, et al. The chest pain choice decision aid: a randomized trial[published Online First: 2012/04/13]. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2012;5:251-9. doi:10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.111.964791
12. Tunis SR, Stryer DB, Clancy CM. Practical clinical trials: increasing the value of clinical research for decision making in clinical and health policy. JAMA 2003;290:1624-32. doi:10.1001/jama.290.12.1624
13. Anderson RT, Montori VM, Shah ND, et al. Effectiveness of the Chest Pain Choice decision aid in emergency department patients with low-risk chest pain: study protocol for a multicenter randomized trial[published Online First: 2014/06/03]. Trials 2014;15:166. doi:10.1186/1745-6215-15-166
14. Kline JA, Jones AE, Shapiro NI, et al. Multicenter, randomized trial of quantitative pretest probability to reduce unnecessary medical radiation exposure in emergency department patients with chest pain and dyspnea[published Online First: 2013/11/28]. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2014;7:66-73. doi:10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.113.001080
15. Karanicolas PJ, Montori VM, Devereaux PJ, Schünemann H, Guyatt GH. A new "mechanistic-practical" framework for designing and interpreting randomized trials[published Online First: 2008/05/13]. J Clin Epidemiol 2009;62:479-84. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.02.009
16. Fergusson D, Aaron SD, Guyatt G, Hébert P. Post-randomisation exclusions: the intention to treat principle and excluding patients from analysis[published Online First: 2002/09/21]. BMJ 2002;325:652-4. doi:10.1136/bmj.325.7365.652
17. Pocock SJ, Simon R. Sequential treatment assignment with balancing for prognostic factors in the controlled clinical trial[published Online First: 1975/03/01]. Biometrics 1975;31:103-15. doi:10.2307/2529712
18. Hargraves I, LeBlanc A, Shah ND, Montori VM. Shared Decision Making: The Need For Patient-Clinician Conversation, Not Just Information. Health Aff (Millwood) 2016;35:627-9. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2015.1354
19. Montori VM, Breslin M, Maleska M, Weymiller AJ. Creating a conversation: insights from the development of a decision aid[published Online First: 2007/08/09]. PLoS Med 2007;4:e233. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0040233
20. Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D. CONSORT Group. CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomized trials[published Online First: 2010/03/26]. Ann Intern Med 2010;152:726-doi:10.7326/0003-4819-152-11-201006010-00232.
21. Elwyn G, Hutchings H, Edwards A, et al. The OPTION scale: measuring the extent that clinicians involve patients in decision-making tasks. Health Expect 2005;8:34-42. doi:10.1111/j.1369-7625.2004.00311.x
22. Accurint for Healthcare, LexisNexis Risk Solutions. GA, USA
23. Patient Centered Outcomes Research Institute. www.pcori.org/ about-us [accessed September 13 2016
24. Weymiller AJ, Montori VM, Jones LA, et al. Helping patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus make treatment decisions: statin choice randomized trial[published Online First: 2007/05/30]. Arch Intern Med 2007;167:1076-82. doi:10.1001/archinte.167.10.1076
25. OConnor AM. Validation of a decisional conflict scale[published Online First: 1995/01/01]. Med Decis Making 1995;15:25-30. doi:10.1 177/0272989X9501500105
26. Thom DH, Ribisl KM, Stewart AL, Luke DA. The Stanford Trust Study Physicians. Further validation and reliability testing of the Trust in Physician Scale. Med Care 1999;37:510-7. doi:10.1097/00005650-199905000-00010
27. Gattellari M, Ward JE. Will men attribute fault to their GP for adverse effects arising from controversial screening tests? An Australian study using scenarios about PSA screening. J Med Screen 2004;11:165-9. doi:10.1258/0969141042467386
28. Elwyn G, Edwards A, Wensing M, Hood K, Atwell C, Grol R. Shared decision making: developing the OPTION scale for measuring patient involvement[published Online First: 2003/04/08]. Qual Saf Health Care 2003;12:93-9. doi:10.1136/qhc.12.2.93
29. Cullen L, Than M, Brown AF, et al. Comprehensive standardized data definitions for acute coronary syndrome research in emergency departments in Australasia[published Online First: 2010/02/09]. Emerg Med Australas 2010;22:35-55. doi:10.1111/j.1742-6723.2010.01256.x
30. Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS, et al. Joint ESC/ACCF/AHA/WHF Task Force for the Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction. Third universal definition of myocardial infarction[published Online First: 2012/08/28]. Circulation 2012;126:2020-35. doi:10.1161/ CIR.0b013e31826e1058
31. Kline JA, Zeitouni RA, Hernandez-Nino J, et alRandomized trial of computerized quantitative pretest probability in low-risk chest pain patients: effect on safety and resource use. Ann Emerg Med 2009;53:727-35. doi:S0196-0644(08)01861-1
32. Hollander JE, Blomkalns AL, Brogan GX, et al. Multidisciplinary Standardized Reporting Criteria Task Force Standardized Reporting Criteria Working Group of Emergency Medicine Cardiac Research and Education Group-International. Standardized reporting guidelines for studies evaluating risk stratification of emergency department patients with potential acute coronary syndromes[published Online First: 2004/12/02]. Ann Emerg Med 2004;44:589-98. doi:10.1016/j. annemergmed.2004.08.009
33. Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, Pub L No. 111-148, 124 Stat 727, 6301
34. Selby JV, Beal AC, Frank L. The Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) national priorities for research and initial research agenda. JAMA 2012;307:1583-4. doi:10.1001/jama.2012.500
35. Hess EP, Grudzen CR, Thomson R, Raja AS, Carpenter CR. Shared Decision-making in the Emergency Department: Respecting Patient Autonomy When Seconds Count. Acad Emerg Med 2015; 22:856-64. doi:10.1111/acem.12703
36. Grudzen CR, Anderson JR, Carpenter CR, Hess EP. Shared Decision Making in the Emergency Department: Development of a Policy-Relevant Patient-Centered Research Agenda. Acad Emerg Med 2016; published online 11 July 2016. doi:10.1111/acem.13047
37. Lindor RA, Kunneman M, Hanzel M, Schuur JD, Montori VM, Sadosty AT. Liability and informed consent in the context of shared decision making. Acad Emerg Med 2016; published online 8 September 2016. doi:10.1111/acem.13078
38. Durand MA, Moulton B, Cockle E, et alCan shared decision-making reduce medical malpractice litigation? A systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res 2015;15:167. doi:10.1186/s12913-015-0823-2
39. Huntington B, Kuhn N. Communication gaffes: a root cause of malpractice claims. Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent) 2003;16:157-61, discussion 161
40. Stacey D, Légaré F, Col NF, et al. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014;(1):CD001431. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub4
41. McNaughton C, Wallston KA, Rothman RL, Marcovitz DE, Storrow AB. Short, subjective measures of numeracy and general health literacy in an adult emergency department. Acad Emerg Med 2011; 18:1148-55. doi:10.11/j.553-2712.011.01210