Are triallists guilty of ‘imbalanced salami slicing’- by favouring positive results in secondary publications?

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

Volumn 79, Issue , 2016, Pages 1-2

  Tugwell, Peter ^a   Knottnerus, J Andŕe ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHARLSON COMORBIDITY INDEX; CLINICAL RESEARCH; COMORBIDITY ASSESSMENT; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; EDITORIAL; HUMAN; INTERVENTION STUDY; LOW BACK PAIN; LYSOSOME STORAGE DISEASE; PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOME; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGNOSIS; PUBLICATION; PUBLISHING; QUALITY CONTROL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); SCORING SYSTEM; STANDARDS; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA;

DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; HUMANS; PUBLICATION BIAS; PUBLISHING; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC;

EID: 85006116302     PISSN: 08954356     EISSN: 18785921     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.11.005     Document Type: Editorial

References (4)

1. [1] Simera, I., Moher, D., Hirst, A., Hoey, J., Schulz, K.F., Altman, D.G., Transparent and accurate reporting increases reliability, utility, and impact of your research: reporting guidelines and the EQUATOR Network. BMC Med, 8, 2010, 24.
2. [2] Charlson, M.E., Pompei, P., Ales, K.L., MacKenzie, C.R., A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 40 (1987), 373–383.
3. [3] Harrell, F., Regression coefficients and scoring rules. J Clin Epidemiol, 49, 1996, 819.
4. [4] Moons, K.G., Harrell, F.E., Steyerberg, E.W., Should scoring rules be based on odds ratios or regression coefficients?. J Clin Epidemiol 55 (2002), 1054–1055.